Transcript
SUBMITTAL REVIEW Date:
January 25, 2011
Project:
Big Blue Bus Santa Monica, Ca.
Contractor:
Thomco Construction/Intelinet
Section:
16710, 16715, 16720, 16725, 16760
Submittal:
001
Reviewed by:
Eliot Kushner
The submittals have been reviewed for conformance to the Contract Documents. Our review is contingent on the fact that the Contractor has reviewed and certified submittals as conforming to the Drawings and Specifications and shall be responsible for verifying conformance of equipment as delivered with final shop submittals and Contract Documents per Section 01300. This document has been reviewed for general conformance and compliance with the design concept of the project and information given in the Contract Documents. Any action shown is subject to the requirements of the Contract Documents. Approval of a specific item does not include approval of the assembly of which the item is a component. Contractor is responsible for: Confirming and correlating all quantities and dimensions; selecting fabrication processes and techniques of construction; coordinating and performing the Work with that of all other trades and performing all Work in a safe and satisfactory manner. Any discrepancies between the Contract Documents and Contractor’s submittal shall be the responsibility of the Contractor.
P2S Engineering Submittal Review Big Blue Bus 5662 January 25, 2011 Page: 2
Section:
16725-1.03A / 1.03B
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description: Notes:
Section:
2.01B Belden 2400 Series Cat. 6 cable As specified
16725-1.03A / 1.03B
Action:
REJ, RES
Paragraph: Description: Notes:
2.05 B Coaxial cable Section 2.05B specified Commscope 2229V Cable. Submittal is for Belden 633938 Cable. If the contractor intent is to submit for an “Or Equal” product, they should provide documentation and narrative to support their requested substitution. The Belden product submitted is not Quad Shielded as specified for the Commscope product and therefore is not equal.
Section:
16725-1.03A / 1.03B
Action: REV, RES
Paragraph: Description: Notes:
50 pair Cat. 3 cable Submittal for Belden CMR 18-599-13 Cable Lack of shop drawings from contractor with reference to where this cable is intended to be utilized. (16710, 1.8)
P2S Engineering Submittal Review Big Blue Bus 5662 January 25, 2011 Page: 3
Section:
16720-1.4A, 16760-1.4A
Action: REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description:
1.4A Cat 6 Jacks
Notes:
Section:
16720-1.4A, 16760-1.4A
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description:
1.4A 48 Port Patch Panel
Notes:
Section:
16720-1.4A, 16760-1.4A
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description:
1.4A BIX cross-connect and mount
Notes:
Section:
16720-1.4A, 16760-1.4A
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description: Notes:
1.4A 2 port 106 monument frame, 3 port furniture plate Shop drawings should indicate intended location. (16710, 1.8)
P2S Engineering Submittal Review Big Blue Bus 5662 January 25, 2011 Page: 4
Section:
16710-1.8C
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description:
1.4A 7 foot 2 post rack,
6 inch vertical cable managers, 2U horizontal cable managers,
ladder rack Notes:
Shop drawings should be submitted indicate rack layout. (16710, 1.8)
Section:
16710
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description:
1.8C J-Hooks
Notes:
Section:
16725
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description:
1.3A Firestop putty
Notes: Section:
16710
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description: Notes:
1.8A Manufacturer Certs., RCDD, License
P2S Engineering Submittal Review Big Blue Bus 5662 January 25, 2011 Page: 5
Section:
16710
Action:
REV, RNR
Paragraph: Description:
1.8B Project history Profile
Notes: Section: Paragraph: Description: Notes:
1670
Action:
RES
1.8 Project shop drawings No project shop drawings in submittal package. Full ompliance with this section required.
LEGEND: REV:
Reviewed
RES:
Resubmit
NC:
Note Corrections
RNR:
Resubmittal Not Required
REJ:
Rejected
