Transcript
3D echocardiography Workshop Advanced Echo 2015 Jim Newton
12:24
The Menu Start
3D guidelines
Measuring EF
Types of 3D echo
Why is there MR?
3D echo saves you time
3D is more accurate
3D is not perfect
3D in planning surgery
Heart failure – why?
What 3D echo cannot do
Future of 3D echo?
Risks of 3D echo
Ad Break 1
Your view of 3D echo 1. No kit and therefore no experience 2. Have the kit but don’t see the point 3. Have tried it but never found it helpful
4. Increasing my use of 3D 5. Use it all the time
What happens next?
This...
What happens next?
What happens next?
What happens next?
Best 2D methods
Best 2D methods
Why do we need accurate TTE?
3D LVEF
As good as CMR? r=0.88
Vannan et al. JACC imaging 2012:5;239-251
Real world data
Does 3D save the day?
3D for EF needs contrast
3D echo modes Real time Live 3D
Multi-beat Full volume
Biplane imaging
Live 3D colour 3D zoom
Other
Full volume Colour
Live 3D echo
3D zoom mode
3D zoom mode
Full volume (multi-beat)
Full volume
Full volume artefacts
Biplane imaging
Why is there MR?
Why is there MR?
Why is there MR?
Why is there MR?
Tethered posterior leaflet
Why is there MR?
Commissural prolapse
Why is there MR?
View structures ‘en-face’
MR through cleft repair site
Speed up workflow?
Speed up workflow?
Speed up workflow?
Speed up workflow?
3D is more accurate
Increase accuracy of measurements
Increase accuracy of measurements
3D TOE MPR planimetry
Best practice
Surgical planning
Surgical planning
Exact pathophysiology
3D in complex anatomy
3D in complex anatomy
3D in complex anatomy
3D pitfalls and challenges
3D pitfalls and challenges
3D pitfalls and challenges
3D pitfalls and challenges
3D pitfalls and challenges
3D pitfalls and challenges
Guideline now released
Heart Failure – why?
Heart failure – why?
Normal bioprosthesis
Normal and abnormal
Normal vs. abnormal
What happens next?
This...
3D colour – field of view
Atrial fibrillation
3D good for en-face structures
Dropout
Dropout
Dropout
Dropout?
Wide field of view
Risks of 3D TOE