Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Aqueous Binders For Lithium Ion Battery

   EMBED


Share

Transcript

Aqueous Binders for Lithium Ion Battery Presented by Wenquan Lu Electrochemical Energy Storage Chemical Sciences and Engineering Argonne National Laboratory Aug. 2014 Outline  Why Aqueous Binder for Lithium Ion Batteries  Results and Discussions – Aqueous binder for carbon anode – Aqueous binder for cathode – Aqueous binder for future silicon electrode  Future works Why Aqueous Binders for Lithium Ion Battery Technically as electrode: high adhesion as battery: high capacity Different binding mechanism Point vs. PVDF Cost Shorting drying Cheap material No recycling Environmentally Organic solvent free 3 SBR for Anode SBR is becoming popular as a binder for carbon anode electrode. Failed First Attempt to Make Graphite Electrode Using SBR as Binder Li/Graphite cell 0V~1.5V C/10 rate 0.6 Voltage, V Anode Graphite (A12, Phillips66 ) SBR (TRD2001, JSR) CMC (MAC350HC, Nippon Paper) Carbon black (C45, Timcal) 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 Capacity, mAh/g  Mixing temperature is critical to make good electrode. SBR Composition Effect on Electrode Making Anode Graphite (A12, Phillips66 ) SBR (TRD2001, JSR) CMC (MAC350HC, Nippon Paper) Carbon black (C45, Timcal) electrode Residuals on substrate (%) tape 30 2% 4% 6% 8% 27 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Percent of SBR in electrodes(%)  Balanced adhesion and cohesion was observed when lower amount of SBR is used. Formation of Li/graphite Cells Using SBR 3rd discharge 0.8 2% SBR 4% SBR 6% SBR 8% SBR Voltage (V) 0.6 0.4 Li/graphite cell 1.5V~0V C/10 rate SBR (%) 0.2 Theoretical Test capacity capacity (mAh) (mAh) 2 4.88 4.61 338 4 4.51 4.14 324 6 4.30 3.43 270 8 4.33 3.03 225 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Capacity (mAh/g)  Normal capacity (mAh/g) The graphite electrode with lower SBR content shows higher reversible capacity. SBR Effect on Electrode Impedance EIS HPPC 120 2% SBR 6% SBR 8% SBR -50 2% SBR 4% SBR 6% SBR 8% SBR 110 100 90 -40 ASI (ohm-cm2) 80 Z'' -30 -20 70 60 50 40 30 20 -10 10 0 0 0 50 100 Z' 150 200 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 DOD (%)  lower impedance were observed for the graphite electrode with lower SBR content.  Larger semicircle indicates higher interfacial resistance. 80 Aqueous Binder for Cathode Materials Lithium manganese rich transition metal oxide (LMRNMC) Cathode Binder/cathode/Carbon/CMC: x/93-x/5/2 (x=1, 2, 4) LMR-NMC (HE5050, Toda) FA (TRD202A, JSR) CMC (MAC350HC, Nippon Paper) Carbon black (C45, Timcal) Formation of LMR-NMC half cell with 1% binder TRD202A 8% PVDF 5.0 5.0 2.0V~4.6V; CC (C/10): 0.25 mA 1.2M LiPF6 EC/EMC (3/7) Li/LMR-NMC half cell 4.5 4.5 4.0 Voltage, V Voltage (V) 4.0 charg-1 charg-2 charg-3 disch-1 disch-2 disch-3 3.5 1st Charge 1st Discharge 2nd Charge 2nd Discharge 3rd Charge 3rd Discharge 3.0 2.5 2.0 0 50 100 150 3.5 Li/NCM cell 4.6V~2.0V 0.343mA 1st charg: 300mAh/g 1st disch: 249mAh/g ICL: 17% 3.0 2.5 wql200 200 Specific Capacity (mAh/g) 250 300 2.0 327 0 50 100 150 200 Capacity, mAh  Almost identical electrochemical performance was obtained for the electrode with TRD 202A compared to that with PVDF binder. 250 300 Electrochemical Performance of LMR-NMC using Fluorine Acrylic Latex Binder 240 HPPC Rate Specific Capacity (mAh/g) 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 0.0 1% SX 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 C Rate HE5050 Cycle – high specific capacity 244 mAh/g, – low Ohmic resistance <50 Ω•cm2, – excellent rate capability (> 178 mAh/g at 2C), and – outstanding capacity retention (>87% after 50 cycles). 11 Total Aqueous Binder Lithium Ion Battery Formation Cycling HPPC   Lithium ion battery with all aqueous binders for both anode and cathode were demonstrated. For graphite/LMR-NMC system, no obvious negative effect on electrochemical performance was observed. 12 Silicon Electrode Development  Silicon-based negative electrodes have a better chance to meet the PHEV energy requirements due to their adjustable high capacities.  Their utilization, however, still waits on developing the high capacity, stable active anode material PLUS developing non-active components (additives & binders), establishing testing protocols, and optimizing electrode engineering. VOLUME EXPANSION mechanical integrity PHASE TRANSITION structural stability SOLID ELECTROLYTE INTERFACE parasitic side reactions COLLECTIVE EFFORTS MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT particle size; morphology; composites ELECTRODE OPTIMIZATION INTERFACIAL MODIFICATION binder; formulation additives; surface modification TEST CONDITIONS temp.; cut-off voltages 13 Silicon Electrode and Binder Binders tested: – – – – – – Poly(vinylidenefluoride) (PVDF) Polyacrylic Acid (PAA) Na-Alginate Poly Amine Imide (PAI) carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SBR) Li/Si-C cell 1.2M LiPF6 in EC/EMC with 3 wt% FEC 5mV to 2V General Electrode composition – 10% C-45 – 30% Silicon – 45% A12 Graphite – 15% Binder  Better cycle performances of silicon electrode were obtained when PAA or alginic acid binders were used as binder. 14 What makes PAA Better for Silicon Electrode Binder Pros Cons PVDF • Good electrode coating • Does not cycle CMC • Carboxylic groups lead strong bonding with metal foil • Low CMC concentration leads to low loading Li-PAA • More carboxylic groups • High degree of cyclability • Doesn’t hydrolyze well in water • Binder tends to trap air bubbles Laminates can be brittle NaAlginate • High degree of cyclability • Relatively inexpensive • Easy to mix • Short shelf life • Laminates can be brittle • Sodium ions add extra inactive material PAI • Makes a good electrode coating • Can cycle well with silicon • NMP is the required solvent • Complex curing process PAA Optimization of Silicon Electrode The electrode using PAA as a binder is brittle. Electrode after cycling 2500 Specific Capacity (mAh/g) C/10 2000 1500 C/5 C/3 C/2 Si:Graphene:PAA = 70:10:20 2C 1C CC 70:10:20 CC 70:10:15:5 1000 Si:Graphene:PAA:SBR = 70:10:15:5 500 0 0 5 10 15 20 Cycle Number (#)  SBR addition improved the electrode integrity and electrochemical performance. Summary   In the work, the aqueous binder for lithium ion battery application has been investigated for both anode and cathode. We successfully made the full cells using graphite anode and high energy density lithium manganese rich metal oxide cathode. The preliminary results indicate that the full cell using aqueous binders only has the comparable electrochemical performance. The aqueous binder for future anode material, silicon, was also studied. In this case, the aqueous binder is “the must” for performance. The cost reduction or environmental effect will be considered in the next phase. Acknowledgement          Qingliu Wu Joseph Kubal Miranda Miguel Steve Trask Bryant Polzin Andrew Jansen SeonBaek Ha (IIT) Jai Prakash (IIT) Dennis Dees   JSR: Jim Banas Nippon paper Support from David Howell and Peter Faguy of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Vehicle Technologies is gratefully acknowledged.