Transcript
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
University of the West of England, Bristol
Carbon Management Plan
Date:
6 Apr 06, revised Aug 2010.
Version number:
2
Owner:
Tessa Gordelier
To be approved by:
Chris Abbott Estates, Finance and IT committee, November 2010
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative UWE Implementation Plan (IP) Contents
1
Executive Summary
3
2
Introduction
5
3
Carbon Management Strategy
5
3.1
Context
5
3.2
Vision
6
3.3
Objectives and targets
6
3.4
Strategy
6
4
Emissions baseline and projections
6
4.1
Scope
6
4.2
Baseline
7
4.3
Projections
9
5
Implementation Plan governance and ownership
10
5.1
Main roles and responsibilities
10
5.2
Reporting and evaluation
11
6
Carbon Reduction Measure Financing
11
7
Carbon Management Implementation Plan
12
7.1
Past actions and achievements
12
7.2
Short term, shortlisted emission reduction opportunities
12
7.3
Longer term strategic actions
15
7.4
Actions and responsibilities
16
7.5
Emissions reduction summary
16
Appendix
14
A.
Details of Year 1 Carbon Reduction Measures
14
B
List of all Carbon Reduction Measures with costs and comments
22
Page 2
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
1 Executive Summary This document presents UWE’s strategy and implementation plan for reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions over the period 2006-2020. Version one of this document covered the five-year period 2006-2011. It has been updated in 2010 to incorporate new land acquired by the University, to include masterplanning aspirations for a consolidated campus, to update changes in UWE’s management structure and to bring the targets up to date with external requirements. The targets listed in this plan are now relevant over the period 2006 – 2020. An update at this time has also allowed for the inclusion of data collected from a carbon emissions inventory, which has collected data for scope 3 emissions at a much more detailed level than was previously available. In 2010 a carbon emissions inventory was commissioned by the Sustainability Board. The base line year is 2008/09. During this year UWE’s total carbon emissions including commuting of staff and students was approximately 34,500 tonnes of CO2 a year. Energy use in academic buildings and accommodation accounts for about half of these emissions, at a cost of £3.2m a year (2009/10 estimate). This represents a significant share of UWE’s controllable budget. Energy consumption in buildings is expected to rise in future years unless action is taken. There is also significant and increasing political attention being paid to carbon emissions in the HE sector. The key strategic objectives for this plan are focused on reducing energy consumption from buildings. Other areas, such as travel, will be tackled in future revisions to the plan or by separate initiatives. The objectives are to: Introduce a new space management policy Implement changes in equipment procurement and refurbishment policy Implement technical carbon saving measures in academic and residential buildings. Develop and introduce a Faculty incentive package for energy saving Influence strategic development of the site in an energy efficient manner The key target for carbon dioxide emissions reduction is set out in the Sustainability Strategy The original target was based on a 30% cut in relative emissions from 2001/2 – 20011/12. In 2010 we are on track to meet this target with a current reduction of 27%. However, when considering absolute reduction, emissions have actually increased by 1%. During this period a 1,932 bed student village came on line, so an emissions increase of only 1% is remarkably low. UWE is currently undergoing development of its sites through a masterplanning process. Future requirements of the sites and energy demand over the next 10 years are quite unpredictable. The original target of 30% reduction in relative CO2 emissions between 2001/2 – 2011/12 has been increased and extended to 2020/21. To bring our targets in-line with external requirements a new absolute target has been developed. The following targets have been confirmed for Scope 1 and 2 emissions:
Absolute reduction from 2005/6 – 2020/21: 1.5% annual reduction Equating to 22.5% total reduction Relative reduction from 2001/2 - 2020/21: 50% relative reduction (based on kgCO2 per m2 and average weather)
The actions detailed in this report will help to achieve the above targets. Detailed cost predictions up to 2012/13 have been listed, for projects further in the future some estimations have been made where possible. Graph 3 on page 17 shows a cash flow diagram on the figures below, less the monies arising from projects.
Page 3
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Table 1 Implementation Plan Prediction of Annual Costs and Energy Savings (constant energy prices) Year Annual Expenditure (£k)
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
210
233
281
257
193
30
30
Total Expenditure (£k) Annual Savings (£k)
67
164
284
378
450
490
Total Savings (£k)
1234
517
2350
Carbon Reduction (tonnes)
307
595
1012
1374
1586
1748
Total Carbon Saving (tonnes)
Page 4
1841
8462
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
2 Introduction UWE was selected as one of 20 Universities to be included in a pilot Carbon Management Initiative Scheme in March 05. A letter of commitment was signed by Alfred Morris the then Vice Chancellor .The Initiative is run by the Carbon Trust with Government money from the Climate Change Levy. The overall scheme aim is for each University to produce an agreed Implementation Plan (IP) to reduce carbon emissions in Feb 06. The initial attraction for UWE to join the scheme was threefold: Synergy from associating with other universities Engage senior management more directly in energy issues Increased strategic thinking on energy use and its means of control This action plan is the main output from the Carbon Management Initiative.
3 Carbon Management Strategy 3.1
Context
The main driver for energy reduction is cost saving. Energy costs in 2003 (£1.1m) went down to 1% of UWE’s turnover, in 2005/6 this grew to be 1.7% (£2.5m) and by 2009/10 it was estimated to be £3.2m. With these large price increases and the future uncertainty of volatile energy prices, more attention is now being given to energy. HEFCE published a Sustainability Strategy and Action Plan in 2005. HEFCE has stated its commitment to ’make sustainable development a central part of their strategy for the future development of the higher education sector’. Since this publication, HEFCE have subsequently linked capital funding to carbon reduction through their Capital Investment Framework 2. Alongside this they carried out a consultation on carbon reduction in HE and consequently released a new policy, Carbon reduction target and strategy for higher education in England. Legislative requirements in energy have also been changing. The introduction of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive has led to closer scrutiny of building’s energy use, and the Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme will capture UWE which will require the purchase of credits to emit carbon dioxide and prove a further incentive for reduction from 2010 onwards. The timing of the original initiative coincides with significant price rises. In 2006 gas prices rose 350% to 3.15p/kWh and electricity prices 200% to 9p/kWh from 2003 levels. Although prices have since reduced marginally, this has highlighted the volatility of the energy market, and both cost and uncertainty is likely to further increase in the future. Since the first version of the Carbon Management Plan was written, Energy Management has become more strategic and structured at UWE. The key carbon reduction target is set out in the Sustainability Strategy. This is supported by the Energy Management Policy and Strategy which lay out key strategic aims, and how they will be met. These draw on the Carbon Management Plan for specific projects as well as internal expertise within the University. Bringing this together, a live Energy Matrix has been developed. This is continually updated with proposed projects and enables projects to be selected based on capital investment required, carbon savings identified and payback periods.
Page 5
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
3.2
Vision
The new environmental policy states UWE should ‘minimise its impact on climate change by conserving energy and reducing the consumption of fossil fuels’. The key strategy objectives for this plan are to: Introduce a new space management policy Implement policy changes in equipment procurement and refurbishment Investigate and develop a Faculty incentive package Implement technical carbon saving measures listed in this plan Influence strategic development of the site in an energy efficient manner
3.3
Objectives and targets
Implementing all the measures in this implementation plan will achieve 15% carbon emission saving in the 5th year of the implementation plan on existing academic buildings, based on predicted growth. At constant energy prices this would save around £100k (Saving- Costs) over the next 5 years and £1.1m over next 7 years. If energy prices increased at 10%/yr (over 30% last 2 years) this would rise to £0.8m over the next 5 years and £2.7m over the next 7 years. Savings would increase savings to £1.8m over 7 years with no price increases and to £4m with 10%/yr price increases. The next stage of the carbon reduction initiative will formulate and plan to reduce residential energy use from present levels so the overall energy use per student would decline. An indicative savings target at this stage would be 10% per student or 0.1 tonne/yr/student which is £25/student/year.
3.4
Strategy
The strategy consists of Agreeing a new space management policy heavily influenced by energy use Policy changes in equipment procurement and refurbishment, so decision makers are aware of the consequences of omitting energy saving features Identify the factors that will enable a Faculty incentive package to be successful Implementing technical carbon saving measures included in this plan Influence strategic development of the site in an energy efficient manner.
The success of the plan is best assured with the following framework:
Technical energy saving projects paid for by a centrally funded budget
Purchasing and Funding requests for equipment and schemes to include energy comparisons
Creation of a new energy post to facilitate the increased number of energy projects
Communication of Electricity use to decision makers
Senior Management involvement in a Faculty Incentive Scheme to save energy
Including energy use aspects in the control and operation of university buildings
4 Emissions baseline and projections 4.1
Scope
The scope of the baseline includes all academic sites owned by UWE. Estimates for carbon figures for non academic sites, transportation etc. are included for information but are a first approximation and not included in future projections. Projections of future energy use and emissions relate only to Academic Campuses owned by UWE.
Page 6
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
4.2
Baseline
Two baselines have been included; 2001/2 and 2005/6. The Baseline year of 2001/2 has been partly chosen to illustrate the stabilisation of emissions from 2001/2 to 2004/5. The rise in 2005/6 is attributed to the new student village build taking its power from the Frenchay Campus. Combining all Academic energy use under Estates’ responsibility has enabled significant past success at reducing energy use on the Frenchay Campus (9% reduction in carbon emissions from 2001/2 to 2004/5 or £200k/yr at 2005/6 prices). Using this baseline allows comparison of past savings to future predictions and to illustrate the significant past price hike in recent years. The energy use in academic buildings in 2001/2 is shown in Table 2. The further baseline year of 2005/6 has been included to bring the plan into line with sector requirements. To help quantify carbon emissions 1 tonne of CO2 equates to 4,000 miles travel in an average car
Page 7
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Table 2 Baseline Years 2001/2 and 2005/6 2001/2 Site
8,294
Gas kWh 14,603,00 0
1,803,000
785
1,004,000
1,577,000
864
1,016,000
2,569,000
1,073
998,000
2,475,000
1,044
75,000
269,000
95
1,280,000
686,000
832
Glenside Campus
1,413,000
3,971,000
1,573
1,730,000
5,053,000
1,965
Total
15,398,00 0
26,078,00 0
11,820
18,466,00 0
24,394,00 0
14,952
St. Matthias Campus Bower Ashton Campus Bristol Business Park buildings
Gas kWh 17,466,00 0
773,000
tonnes CO2
Elec kWh 13,454,00 0
Frenchay Campus
Elec kWh 12,121,00 0
2005/6 tonnes CO2
10,248
Note. Bristol business park buildings: Between 2001/2 – 2005/6 emissions from three new buildings were added to the original building, Emerson’s Green.
In the original plan estimates were made for the following sources. Since then, the Carbon Emissions inventory has allowed these figures to be corroborated. The data sets collected for this cover 2007/08 and 2008/09. Although a different baseline, the following includes 2008/09 data, to give an idea of scale of each of these other components to UWE’s total carbon emissions:Staff & Student Commuting 11,300 tonnes CO2/yr (based on sample surveys) Student Accommodation 6,800 tonnes CO2/yr (electrically heated halls of residences run by Student Accommodation services, it does not account for individual flats and houses) Fleet and UWE Buses 1,000 tonnes CO2/yr (estimate could not be verified) University business travel 1,100 tonnes CO2/yr (estimate based on data from House Services) 20,200 tonnes CO2/yr Other Emissions Total Embedded energy in waste disposal, construction of new buildings, and new equipment has not been estimated. Table 2 clearly shows that Frenchay is the largest campus and the site where the greatest resources should be targeted. Table 3 shows the increase in electricity units of 8% and a reduction in gas use by 11% over 4 years since 2001/2. This equates to stabilisation in CO2 whilst new build has increased floor area by 5%. This UWE emissions stabilisation has been possible from energy saving work on Frenchay campus. Due to the new buildings on the Bristol Business Park being comfort cooled and containing a second IT machine room, the new buildings are poorer energy performers than the Frenchay site. Table 3 of Recent Energy Use
2001/2 2002/3 2003/4 2004/5
Page 8
cost £ £1,328,167 £1,227,346 £1,232,941 £1,590,746
kWh elec 15,397,679 15,925,989 16,429,524 16,637,414
kWh gas 26,078,559 24,661,708 23,183,761 23,291,966
tonnes CO2 11,576 11,534 11,470 11,580
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
4.3
Projections
An emission/energy prediction for the next 7 years for Academic Campuses is made without implementing this plan (NonIP). This includes a rise in 2006/7 for the Frenchay Academic site energy use based on increased social use due to the new student village being in full use. For 2006/7 an overall 3% rise in electricity use and a 2% rise in gas use are predicted. Thereafter electricity is projected to rise by 2% per year, based on the lowest annual rise in electricity in the last 10 years. Gas use is projected not to rise after 2006/7 despite new buildings coming on line. The New Student Village and New Sports Hall are not included in these projections as their energy estimates could significantly complicate the comparison of figures. The prediction figures are shown in Table 4
Page 9
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Table 4 Prediction of not going ahead with the Implementation Plan tonnes kWh elec kWh gas cost £ CO2 2005/6 £2,495,081 18,839,673 23,367,635 12,541 2006/7 £3,073,321 19,404,863 23,834,988 12,873 2007/8 £3,424,480 19,792,960 23,834,988 13,040 2008/9 £3,816,101 20,188,820 23,834,988 13,210 2009/10 £4,252,884 20,592,596 23,834,988 13,383 2010/11 £4,740,076 21,004,448 23,834,988 13,561 2011/12 £5,283,540 21,424,537 23,834,988 13,741 2012/13 £5,889,823 21,853,028 23,834,988 13,925 Table 4 costing does not include annual price increases due to significant market volatility. Gas use is expected to be kept under control due to required efficiencies under new building legislation. Nevertheless due to the Electricity increase which is the larger cost component the carbon increase in 5 years is 8% and 7 years is 11%. Expected Emissions if no Implementation of the Plan (NonIP) 16,000
Emissions of Carbon per year (tonnes)
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
Emissions tonnes CO2 (NonIP)
6,000
4,000
2,000
0 2001/2 2002/3 2003/4 2004/5 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8 2008/9 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 year
Graph 1 Carbon Emissions prediction for Academic sites if there is no implementation plan
5 Implementation Plan governance and ownership 5.1
Main roles and responsibilities
To ensure effective and ongoing ownership of this Carbon Management programme annual progress reports will be made to the board of governors. UMG Representative:- Chris Abbott, Director of Facilities, is the person responsible for setting the strategic direction for Carbon Management and agreeing the budgets to be devoted to the Implementation Plan. He will also review the progress against the objectives outlined in the Plan. Carbon Manager: Tessa Gordelier, the Energy Management Engineer, reporting to Simon Ho, the Technical Team Leader, is responsible for developing and implementing the Carbon Management Plan.
Page 10
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
She is responsible for achieving UWE’s Carbon Management targets and identifying successes and barriers. HEI Carbon Management group set up for this project will continue to meet 3 times a year until it is incorporated into the new structures of the University. The members of Carbon Management Core Team set up for this initiative were Simon Ho-Technical Team Leader, Roger Broughton-Financial Controller, an academic representative, Mark WebsterEnvironmental Officer & Tessa Gordelier-Energy management engineer. The brainstorming exercises set up with faculty representation and facilitated by FAS will take place when needed for idea generation and possible solutions to address Faculty difficulties in implementation.
Carbon Management Plan Responsibility Table 5 Activity Implementation Plan Set objectives, Manage implementation plan, Monitor and review progress Implement the Plan Financing of Carbon Management Activities Control of Buildings Use Purchasing Issues Incentives for Departments Technical Measures Policy Changes
5.2
UMG rep
Responsible person Project Support Manager
Chris Abbott
Simon Ho
Tessa Gordelier
Chris Abbott
Tessa Gordelier Tessa Gordelier
Core Group Roger Broughton
Chris Abbott
Chris Abbott Chris Abbott
To be decided Tessa Gordelier & Helen Baker To be decided Tessa Gordelier Simon Ho
T.B.A.
Reporting and evaluation
The following reports are planned Termly reports (3 a year) to the Estates management team. Any or all of these reports could be passed to the UMG by the Director of Facilities as required. An annual progress report to UMG on savings and spend will be produced. This will include an update on the measures including any modification to the list of proposed carbon reduction measures When agreed the UMG annual report will be summarised and made available to staff and students through the Bulletin and Student Paper. After 3 years it is expected a fuller assessment is carried out with possible use of independent assessors, to review strengths and weaknesses. This will be a useful stage to consider implementing BS9001 and formulating any subsequent 5 year plan.
6 Carbon Reduction Measure Financing The majority of funding will be obtained via the submission of Fin 10s to gain central funding. Business cases will asses both payback and the CO2 savings. Where short paybacks are possible, funding will be gained through the Salix/HEFCE Revolving Green Fund. Many measure take time to break even and in this plan savings equal costs at year four (assuming constant energy prices). This compares with the new building regulations require energy saving measures with a 15 year payback to be installed into new buildings after April 2006.
Page 11
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
7 Carbon Management Implementation Plan 7.1
Past actions and achievements
Since 2001 Estates have employed an energy manager as part of its strategy to save energy on Academic Campuses. Concentrating on the Frenchay Campus savings of £200k/year have been realised at present day prices. Energy costs have risen at a faster rate than savings so the overall energy bill has risen. Frenchay Campus gas savings of 20% have been achieved through tighter scheduling, installing efficient equipment and improving BMS control. Lessons gained from a successful trial of condensing boiler at P Block on the Frenchay Campus and the main boilers at Bower Ashton are planned to be utilised in the main Charles Darwin boiler upgrade presently being planned. Reductions in water use and a reduced rise of the electrical use on Frenchay Campus have been achieved, however to make significant further inroads into gas savings and especially electricity savings requires a step change in activity and its finance.
7.2
Short term, shortlisted emission reduction opportunities
The planned actions are summarised in the tables by type of action below. These tables relate to Trials, Technical Measures, Policy Change, Awareness Raising and Data Collection. Further details of the early projects are contained in Appendix A page 14. Costs and savings are taken over the first 7 years of the initiative and take into account when the project begins. This will take the plan to 2013/14. Actions beyond this will be identified in section 7.3, longer term strategic objectives. Appendix B details progress with each of these actions when revision 2 of the plan was completed. This shows if actions are complete, ongoing or abandoned, and gives reasons if the actions have been abandoned.
Policy Change Table 6 shows a range of Policy changes. These are required to get energy issues a greater profile within UWE and included when making decisions. Table 6 Policy Changes
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
P6
Action
Year
Responsibility
Cost
Saving
Funding
Integration of energy issues into purchases over £20k Purchase Questions for items below £20k
6
Tessa Gordelier /Helen Baker
£30k
£128k
Central Fund
7
Tessa Gordelier /Helen Baker
£15k
£38k
Central Fund
Tessa Gordelier
£20k
£125k
Central Fund
Doug Smith
£60k
£114k
Central Fund or Project fund
Tessa Gordelier /Portering
£35k
£100k
Central Fund
Tessa Gordelier
£278k
£56k
Central Fund
Room scheduling to take 6 account of energy saving Include energy efficiency in 1 New Buildings and ongoing Refurbishments Development and implement 6 policy for night switch off of equipment and site lock down Energy Champions with incentive scheme for Faculties (a % of all savings is included)
Page 12
6
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Technical Measures Tables 7 & 8 cover technical measures which entail installing equipment or design alterations which will save on energy use. Increasing the payback to 5 years allows a range of further measures to be implemented.
Table 7 Trial Technical Measures Action Tr1 Tr2 Tr3
Tr4
Tr5
Trial Device to reduce power use of Air conditioning (Link Te16) Trial Reduction of Estates Voltage by 5% (Link Te13) Trial lighting saving system in different sized rooms (Link Te5) Trial linking of cooling to Presence Detection (Link Te9) Trial demonstration of free cooling working (Link Te10)
(small pilot studies) Year
Responsibility
Cost
Savings
Funding
6
Tessa Gordelier
£10k
£30k
Central Fund or ESMD
1
Tessa Gordelier
£5k
£5k
Central Fund or ESMD
1 ongoing
Tessa Gordelier
£3k
£3k
Central Fund or ESMD
6
Tessa Gordelier
£2k
£3k
Central Fund or ESMD
4
Tessa Gordelier
£5k
£3k
Central Fund or ESMD
Year
Responsibility
Cost
1
Simon Ho
Table 8 Technical Measures Action Te1
Te2 Te3 Te4
Te5
Te6 Te7
New condensing boilers in Charles Darwin, Frenchay Campus Install Presence Detectors in meeting rooms Optimise S block BMS control Implement Lighting Opportunity Survey (Link Tr3) Implement agreed energy saving PC settings with IT & CEMS Replace Bower Ashton Tower inefficient Lighting Replace inefficient Fans in Charles Darwin
Te9
Install Presence Detection in other cooled rooms (Link to Tr4) Install further free cooling in refurbishments (Link Tr5)
Te10
Lighting control for Classrooms used 5-9pm
Te8
Te11
Te12
Improve controls to limit winter temp to 23C were acceptable Site Voltage reductions at
Page 13
Additional
Saving
Funding
£164k
Project Funded
£100k 7
Tessa Gordelier
£22k
£36k
Central Fund
2
Tessa Gordelier
£16k
£28k
Central Fund
2
Tessa Gordelier
£60k
£55k
Internal expertise used to progress without survey
3
Tessa Gordelier
£11k
£25k
Central Fund
2
Doug Smith
£32k
Project Funded
Additional £50k
2
Simon Ho
£25k
£21k
Project Fund or Central Fund
7
Tessa Gordelier
£12k
£57k
Central Fund
5 ongoing
Tessa Gordelier
£7k
£30k
Central Fund
5 ongoing
Tessa Gordelier
£26k
£32k
Central Fund
ongoing
Tessa Gordelier
£10k
£24k
Central Fund
3
Tessa Gordelier
£25k
£86k
Central Fund
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Te13 Te14
Te15
Te16
Te17 Te18 Te19
Te20 Te21 Te22 Te23
Te24
Te25 Te26 Te27 Te28
Sub Transformers (link to Tr2) Pipe insulation improvements Review all BMS manual settings and return to automatic BMS control Device to reduce power use fitted to all Air conditioning (Link Tr1) Summer immersion hot water for Bower Ashton & Cannon Kitson Biofuel Boiler for Bower Ashton study Settable Radiator TRV’s for B and Q block corridors Urinal controls for St Matthias and Bower Ashton Campuses Timers on Vending Machines Improve BMS summer switch off of heating Fan Turndown in S Block and Charles Darwin Review all Energy Audits and assess all uncompleted actions Review of inefficient lighting and installation of LED lighting with control Carry out energy audit of buildings on New Land Complete actions on energy survey of New Land Progress biomass project at Bower Ashton (link to Te17) Complete energy audit of all buildings to identify further actions for 2013-2020
3
Tessa Gordelier
£5k
£5k
Central Fund
3
Tessa Gordelier
£40k
£53k
Central Fund
7
Tessa Gordelier
£41k
£39k
Central Fund
3
Tessa Gordelier
£15k
£8k
Central Fund
4
Tessa Gordelier
£120k
£50k
Central Fund
6
Tessa Gordelier
£6k
£6k
Central Fund
4
Tessa Gordelier
£8k
£7k
Central Fund
4
Tessa Gordelier
£4k
£4k
Central Fund
4
Tessa Gordelier
£5k
£6k
Central Fund
4
Tessa Gordelier
£10k
£10k
Central Fund
7
Tessa Gordelier
£60k
£12k
Central Fund
5
Tessa Gordelier
£250k
£20k
Central Fund
6
Tessa Gordelier
£4.5k
n/a
Central Fund
7
Tessa Gordelier
?
?
Central Fund
6
Tessa Gordelier
£40k
£6k
Central Fund / Carbon Trust
7/8
Tessa Gordelier
?
?
Central Fund
Awareness raising and training Awareness raising and training are an important part of achieving a gradual ‘cultural change’ required to facilitate the implementation of the other actions. Table 9 shows a number of awareness raising activities. Table 9 Awareness Issues Action A1
A2 A3
Faculty 3 monthly building energy use reports to Deans and Energy Champions Energy awareness week Energy awareness Campaign on Student Accommodation
Page 14
Year
Responsibility
Cost
Saving
Funding
5 ongoing
Tessa Gordelier
£10k
£0k
Central Fund
5
Tessa Gordelier
£2k
£10k
Central Fund
5
Tessa Gordelier
£5k
£15k
Central Fund
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Data collection and monitoring Data-Collection is required to monitor existing energy use, quantify savings and to highlight good and bad practice. Table 10 shows a number of planned measures. Table 10 Data Collection D1
D2 D3
Action
Year
Responsibility
Cost
Saving
Funding
Set up automated monitoring system to highlight problems and good practice. Install meters on chillers
6
Tessa Gordelier
£13k
£59k
Central Fund
2
Tessa Gordelier
£8k
£18k
Central Fund
3
Tessa Gordelier
£30k
£29k
Central Fund
6
Tessa Gordelier
£150k
£50k
Central Fund
Improve large buildings sub metering M&T project – complete second phase to gain better metering information
D4
7.3
Longer term strategic actions
Actions beyond 2012/13 are listed below. They will be largely influenced by masterplanning options. The following list the likely scenarios, with associated costs and savings. Table 11 Long term actions L1
L2
L3 L4
L5
L6
L7
Action
Year
Responsibility
Cost
Saving
Funding
Consolidation of St.Matthias staff into existing Frenchay buildings Consolidation of Glenside campus into new buildings on Frenchay Campus New build and demolish existing FAS building Large scale refurbishment of remaining Frenchay building stock Large scale refurbishment of remaining Bower Ashton building stock Include energy efficiency measures in masterplanning developments Second energy audit of all building stock to detail further projects
7/8
Douglas Smith
tba
£68k
Central Fund
9/10
Douglas Smith
tba
£76k
Central Fund
9/10
Douglas Smith
tba
£19k
Central Fund
11/12
Douglas Smith
tba
£88k
Central Fund
9/10
Douglas Smith
tba
£11k
Central Fund
9 onwards
Tessa Gordelier
£0
n/a
Central Fund
11/12
Tessa Gordelier
£5k
n/a
Central Fund
Other areas of carbon emission It is anticipated that carbon management activities will be expanded in the future revisions of the plan to cover all main sources of direct and indirect emissions, namely:
Leased buildings
Fleet and UWE buses
Staff & student travel
Student accommodation
University business travel
Page 15
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
7.4
Actions and responsibilities
The tables above clearly identify individuals responsible for each task. A description of each carbon reduction measure is identified in the spreadsheet included in Appendix B, which also provides update on progress when Revision 2 was written. This is there to aid the comparison of actions, and their communication to others. A more detailed analysis of the schemes in year 1 and 2 of the ‘Technical Measures’ and ‘Policy Changes’ showing who is responsible and key success factors is in Appendix A.
7.5
Emissions reduction summary
The analysis of emissions in the Tables 12 and 13 are based on the savings from the listed measures proposed in this plan up to 2012/2013. The target aim is on the basis of further schemes being identified over the next 10 years, resulting from further investigation works. Graph 2 plots both of these emission saving scenarios next to the non implementation of the Plan for the first seven years of the plan. Table 12 Projection of energy use and emissions based on implementing the listed measures. tonnes kWh elec kWh gas cost £ CO2 2005/6 £2,664,155 18,839,673 23,367,635 12,541 2006/7 £2,675,286 19,187,409 22,711,985 12,566 2007/8 £2,628,015 18,916,120 22,121,021 12,337 2008/9 £2,559,854 18,759,815 20,611,201 11,983 2009/10 £2,493,565 18,726,924 18,809,325 11,626 2010/11 £2,440,171 18,625,804 17,566,908 11,347 2011/12 £2,440,742 18,807,497 17,074,492 11,331 2012/13 £2,455,524 19,142,104 16,559,941 11,377 Table 13 Projection of energy use and emissions based on 20% Saving Target tonnes kWh elec kWh gas cost £ CO2 2005/6 £2,664,155 18,839,673 23,367,635 12,541 2006/7 £2,655,080 19,114,924 22,337,651 12,464 2007/8 £2,579,376 18,623,840 21,549,699 12,103 2008/9 £2,475,562 18,283,480 19,536,606 11,574 2009/10 £2,373,987 18,105,033 17,134,104 11,041 2010/11 £2,289,341 17,832,923 15,477,547 10,609 2011/12 £2,276,379 17,935,150 14,820,993 10,528 2012/13 £2,282,092 18,238,462 14,134,926 10,528
Page 16
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Comparison of Non Implementation of Plan (NonIP) with Implementation Plan (IP) and identified savings 16,000
Emissions of Carbon per year (tonnes) 14,000 12,000
10,000 Emissions tonnes CO2 (NonIP) 8,000
Emissions tonnes CO2 (IP) Emissions 20% Savings
6,000
4,000
2,000
0 2001/2
2002/3
2003/4
2004/5
2005/6
2006/7
2007/8
2008/9 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
Year
Graph 2 Comparison of Implementation Plan Target v Non implementation of the Plan (NonIP). Table 1 is repeated to show the savings each year resulting from the measures detailed in the implementing plan based on a constant energy price. This cost analysis includes monies for the extra work on Frenchay E Block boilers and Bower Ashton Tower lighting that will be paid by separate projects. Repeat of Table 1 Prediction of Annual Costs and Energy Savings (no price rises) Year Annual Expenditure (£k)
2006/07
210
2007/08
233
2008/09
281
2009/10
257
2010/11
193
2011/12
30
Total Expenditure (£k) Annual Savings (£k)
67
164
284
378
450
490
Total Savings (£k)
2012/13
30
1234 517
2350
Carbon Reduction (tonnes)
Page 17
307
595
1012
1374
1586
1748
1841
Total Carbon Saving (tonnes)
8462
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Graph3 shows the predicted cash flow from same data in cash terms based on no price increase. The maximum cash deficit in any one year is £110k. This is on the basis that over £100k is coming from other project sources to assist in the Installation of New Boilers in E block and Bower Ashton Tower Block lighting. The Cumulative savings of over £1.1m in year 7 assumes 10% overlap of energy efficient measures, as more projects are implemented.
Cash Flow Resulting in Implementing Carbon Saving Measures 1300
Annual Sums in £k
1000
700 Costs Each Year Savings Each Year Cumulative Savings 400
100 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-200 Year from Implementation
Graph 3 Showing Cash flow over the 7 year Implementation Plan in £k’s, assuming no price increases
Page 18
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Appendix A Details of Year 1 Carbon Reduction Measures
Action No Tr1 Electronic Device Fitted to P Block Cooling Units Description and notes Costs and benefits Based over the first 5 and 7 years of the overall programme.
Start Year 1
A switching device if fitted to low loaded compressors can save a 10% of the energy. This is a trial of an energy intensive building to demonstrate this
Capital & operation costs £ 9 k over 5 years; £ 9 k over 7 years CO2 Emissions reduction 112 tonnes over 5 years 157 tonnes over 7 years Financial savings £ 30 k over 5 years; £ 40 k over 7 years Payback period 2yrs (based on this measure alone)
Resources
Funding Source: Carbon Reduction budget or Estates budget Other Resources: Project Manager 3 days over first 5 years 4 days over first 7 years Other support 3 days over first 5 years 4 days over first 7 years
Ownership and accountability
Those responsible for implementing and assisting with the action are recorded below: Senior Champion Simon Ho Finance/business case n/a Project Manager; Tessa Gordelier To be Consulted Site Electrical Team To be informed of Actions CEMS Faculty Reports: The standard level of reporting would include progress on this trial
Ensuring success
Key success factors: Electrical savings on temporary and building metering Principal risks: Technology not effective on our equipment and causes maintenance problems Risk mitigation: Trial to identify technology as references suggest and effective as supplier portrays Means of measuring performance: Local temporary before and after metering will take place as well as building metering where long term savings will register.
Performance / success measure
Timing Sources of information and guidance .
Page 19
Key dates Dec 2006 Energy efficiency guide GPG1, references and Middlesex University
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Action No Tr2
Estates Voltage Reduction
Description and notes Costs and benefits Based over the first 5 and 7 years of the overall programme.
Start Year 1
This is a reduction in voltage to the estates building to demonstrate the acceptability of voltage to save energy on a range of electrical equipment
Capital & operation costs £ 4 k over 5 years; £ 5 k over 7 years CO2 Emissions reduction 19 tonnes over 5 years 26 tonnes over 7 years Financial savings £ 1 k over 5 years; £ 5 k over 7 years Payback period 4 yrs (based on this measure alone), improved after trial
Resources
Funding Source: Carbon Reduction budget or Estates budget Other Resources: Project Manager 3 days over first 5 years 4 days over first 7 years Other support 1 days over first 5 years 2 days over first 7 years
Ownership and accountability
Those responsible for implementing and assisting with the action are recorded below: Senior Champion Simon Ho Finance/business case n/a Project Manager; Tessa Gordelier To be Consulted To be informed of Actions Estates Staff Reports The standard level of reporting would include progress on this trial
Ensuring success
Key success factors: Reduction in Energy Use Principal risks: Electrical Equipment operation is compromised Risk mitigation: Carry out trial in limited area under Estates control Means of measuring performance: Local temporary before and after metering will take place as well as building metering where long term savings will register.
Performance / success measure
Timing Sources of information and guidance .
Page 20
Key dates Dec 2006 Energy Consortium’s annual conference, laws of physics and other consultants not financially interested.
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Action No. Tr3 Automatic lighting control of different rooms Description and notes
Costs and benefits Based over the first 5 and 7 years of the overall programme.
Start Year 1
Lighting control is now cost effect for retrofitting under the combined effect of cheaper equipment, high energy prices and increasing payback criteria. This trial will inform a campaign across the rest of the University in subsequent years.
Capital & operation costs £ 2 k over 5 years; £ 3 k over 7 years CO2 Emissions reduction 9 tonnes over 5 years 12 tonnes over 7 years Financial savings £ 3 k over 5 years; £ 4 k over 7 years Payback period 5 yrs (trials do not have scale savings)
Resources
Funding Source: Carbon Reduction budget or Estates budget Other Resources: Project Manager 2 days over first 5 years 3 days over first 7 years Other support 3 days over first 5 years 3 days over first 7 years
Ownership and accountability
Those responsible for implementing and assisting with the action are recorded below: Senior Champion Simon Ho Finance/business case n/a Project Manager; Tessa Gordelier To be Consulted; Administrators of Faculties affected To be informed of Actions Room Users Reports The standard level of reporting would include progress on this trial
Ensuring success
Key success factors: Measured Energy Savings from line currents Principal risks: Lighting control not acceptable to users Risk mitigation: Trial in selected areas Means of measuring performance: Line current logging before and after installation, since main energy meter logging may not be possible on the initially small loads
Performance / success measure
Timing Sources of information and guidance .
Page 21
Key dates Feb 07 Energy Efficient Lighting Guides from the Carbon Trust and experienced lighting engineer on Estates Staff.
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Action No Tr4 Presence detector to control cooling operation Description and notes
Costs and benefits Based over the first 5 and 7 years of the overall programme.
Start Year 1
Significant savings and simplification in scheduling is possible if detectors sense if people present and so cooling needs to be enabled. This trial will inform a more widespread action on control settings to use.
Capital & operation costs £ 4 k over 5 years; £ 6 k over 7 years CO2 Emissions reduction tonnes over 5 years tonnes over 7 years Financial savings £ 4 k over 5 years; £ 6 k over 7 years Payback period 5 yrs (expect this to improve with greater application)
Resources
Funding Source: Carbon Reduction budget or Estates budget Other Resources: Project Manager 2 days over first 5 years 3 days over first 7 years Other support 2 days over first 5 years 3 days over first 7 years
Ownership and accountability
Those responsible for implementing and assisting with the action are recorded below: Senior Champion Simon Ho Finance/business case n/a Project Manager; Tessa Gordelier To be Consulted; Administrators of Faculties affected To be informed of Actions Room Users Reports The standard level of reporting would include progress on this trial
Ensuring success
Key success factors: Measured Energy Savings from line currents Principal risks: Cooling control not acceptable to users Risk mitigation: Trial in selected areas, allows time to alter settings to find suitable levels
Performance / success measure
Means of measuring performance: Line current logging before and after installation, since main energy meter logging may not be possible on the initially small loads
Timing
Key dates Oct 2006 Savings analysis straightforward, idea from Senior Champion
Sources of information and guidance .
Page 22
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Action No Tr5 Provision of cost effective free cooling in Winter Description and notes
Costs and benefits Based over the first 5 and 7 years of the overall programme.
Start Year 1
Many rooms with cooling could be cooled with minimal energy from using outside air for most months of the year. This trail is to investigate acceptable ways to achieve this and apply its findings in new and future refurbishments.
Capital & operation costs £ 5 k over 5 years; £ 5 k over 7 years CO2 Emissions reduction 5 tonnes over 5 years 7 tonnes over 7 years Financial savings £ 5 k over 5 years; £ 7 k over 7 years Payback period 5 yrs (based on this measure alone)
Resources
Funding Source: Carbon Reduction budget or Estates budget Other Resources: Project Manager 3 days over first 5 years 5 days over first 7 years Other support 3 days over first 5 years 5 days over first 7 years
Ownership and accountability
Those responsible for implementing and assisting with the action are recorded below: Senior Champion Simon Ho Finance/business case n/a Project Manager; Tessa Gordelier / James Burfoot To be Consulted; Administrators of Faculties affected To be informed of Actions Room Users Reports The standard level of reporting would include progress on this trial
Ensuring success
Key success factors: Acceptable conditions in room for most of year, cost effective potential. Principal risks: User understanding and unacceptable room conditions Risk mitigation: Trial, liaison with users, and the provision of user control Means of measuring performance: Success in faculty rooms such that they are happy to apply it in further rooms they use. Improved reliability of cooling.
Performance / success measure Timing Sources of information and guidance .
Page 23
Key dates Mar 07 Has been used with success in Business School Reception area.
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Action Te1: Condensing boilers in Charles Darwin, Frenchay Campus Description and notes
Replacement of boilers at the end of their life with new. Combined Heat and Power options considered but no significant summer heat load exists on the Frenchay Campus
Costs and benefits
Resources
Ownership and accountability
Ensuring success
Performance / success measure Timing Sources of information and guidance .
Page 24
Start Year 1
Financial investment Extra £100-200k Emissions reduction 170 tonnes/year Financial savings £33k/yr year 1 and year5 Payback period about 5 years,
Funding: funding will be from the Estates Strategic Maintenance Budget as the boilers require replacement Management: Significant resources are already allocated to this project Extra resources calculated at 1 day/year for the Energy Manager and further 10days/year from him or another engineer. Completed by Mark Bagnall Estates Principal Engineer is the Project Manager of this significant project. He will report to John Fell the Director on Estates for Progress. David Oldham will analyse and report on resulting carbon, energy and cost savings resulting. Trials at Bower Ashton and P block have demonstrated the savings on small and medium scale boilers Principal risks: Boilers capable of temperatures over 110C are not normally made to cope with 55C return flow. Detailed analysis by consultants of manufacturers and guarantees will be in the contract with post monitoring of flow temperatures Past metering of energy use is good for all boiler areas and savings will be readily assessed Partial Installation May 06, Full replacement May 07 Energy Efficiency Office Guides and BRE recommended boiler control strategies
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Action P4: Energy Involvement in future building and refurbishment Description and notes Costs and benefits
Building specifications to include energy targets, and cost effective carbon saving measures to be championed at the cuts stage.
Resources
Ownership and accountability Ensuring success
Start Year 1
Operational costs are estimated at £30k/yr for New Buildings at a rate of 2,500sq.m/year Emissions reduction year 1 32 tonnes/yr, year 5 163 tonnes/yr Financial savings year 1 £8k/yr rising to £38k/yr year 5 Payback period approx 5 years The first 2 years funding of £30k/year is programmed from Carbon Reduction budget, but later years this is expected to be the culture of new build as the New building Regulations are more fully understood Management: Energy Managers time 9 days in year 1 reducing to 8 days in year 5.
Initially the Energy Manager will be involved in the design meeting but in later years this is expected to be included in the surveyors and engineers brief as well as the consultant’s and architects.
Known key success factors: R Block which was designed for low energy used 1/3 of the energy per square meter in the first year compared to S block where energy savings not addressed Principal risk: Cutting costs of new build in the past leads to energy saving aspects and equipment being removed. Mitigation of risk: Senior Management commitment to the policy of energy saving in new build, and the energy labelling of new build in the 2006 Building Regulations
Performance / success measure
A before and after comparison is not available here. However an energy comparison against average use on the site and the 100 kWh/sq.m target can be made.
Timing
Ongoing over 5 years Use of consultants with track records, Energy Efficiency Guides, HEFCE University benchmark data, BRE benchmark data and UWE’s own average kWh/sq.m use
Sources of information and guidance .
Page 25
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Action D1: Set up Automated monitoring system Description and notes
Costs and benefits
Data collection of meters automated and accurate so that automated exception reporting can be programmed to quickly pick up rises and reductions in energy use. An aid to reducing waste, passing out energy information to Faculties and monitoring future savings quickly.
Resources
Ownership and accountability
Ensuring success
Performance / success measure
Timing Sources of information and guidance .
Page 26
Start Year 1
Financial investment, operation costs £10k/yr year 1 reducing to £1k/yr year 5. Emissions reduction year 1 zero tonnes/yr rising to 105 tonnes/yr for year 5 Financial savings £0k year 1 rising to £24k year 5 Payback period; 2 years
Funding: Carbon Reduction budget Management: Energy Managers time 6 days/yr dropping to 4, with other engineer/surveyors time 10 days in the first year dropping to 4 subsequently. Those responsible for implementing and assisting with the action are recorded below: Senior Champion Simon Ho Finance/business case n/a Project Manager; Melissa Clarke To be Consulted; Administrators of Faculties affected To be informed of Actions Room Users Reports The standard level of reporting would include progress on this trial
Known key success factors: Present system is not automated and items not picked up routinely except when time to investigate. This system will remove the speculative investigation element Principal risks: Savings will not follow plan, high energy use will not be able to be moderated due to University needs Main means of risk mitigation: Investigate other users of the system to check system effective. It is estimated that initially very low saving predicted to allow the system time to operate effectively. Also UWE drafting an environmental policy which highlights energy use. Metrics for displaying performance against target, and consideration of physical or financial measurement necessary to establish emissions reduction or energy or cost saving benefits. Milestones, Feb 07 to begin implementation if funding made available Energy Efficiency Guides and Information form other University energy managers
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Appendix B List of Carbon Saving Measures with detail on progress
Completed measures Carbon Saving Measure Ref
Year Install New condensing Gas boilers in 0G5
Te1
1
P/B yrs
Total 5yr Cost
Total 5yr Save
4
103
164
3
100 Proj fund
32
1.3
40
53
Replace Bower Ashton inefficient lighting on site. Te6
2
Te14
3
D3
3
Improve metering in £4-25k/yr spending areas. Grant bid in to help with this
5
30
29
Trial demonstration of free cooling working to reduce/remove cooling on future refurbishment
4
5
3
Bio fuel for Bower Ashton study BMS Summer switch off work on to allow effect summer off on warm spring/autumn days
4.5
120
50
2
5
6
Replace 3 Fans in Charles Darwin Energy Awareness Week
5
25
21
4 4
Te21 Te7
4 2
A2 A3
5 5
Energy Awareness Campaign on Student Accommodation
Savings informed by P block Trial Presently using T12
Review all BMS manual settings and return to automatic BMS control using other staff
Tr5 Te17
Payback/Comment
Need Andover Long term benefit P block data centre trial Investigation only Tech: long term 0
0.5
2
10
Through sustainability week
1
5
15
Later once people responding
4
4
5
Estates electrical supply too risky
Abandoned measures with reasons Tr2
Page 27
1
Trial Reduce Estates Voltage 5% and measure power change and any equipment problems
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Lighting opportunity survey (demonstrate experience) and implementation of survey. Tender with Helen Baker
4
60
55
2
Te4
Timers on vending machines 2
4
4
1.2
8
7
4
Te20
Urinal Controls St Matts and Bower Ashton
4
Te19
Internal expertise has allowed roll out without external consultant Vending machines owned by 3rd party - UWE not permitted to use timers. St.Matts work abandoned, not suitable for Bower Ashton
Partially completed measures with actions for taking forward Ref
Year
Carbon Saving Measure
P/B yrs
Total 5yr Cost
Total 5yr Save
Payback/Comment
Energy Involvement in New Build 2,500 sq.m/yr
P4
Page 28
4.2
3
3
Many installed, potential for many more installations.
28
Some work done through BMS needs more attention
25
Some work with IT on spec, energy star rated PCs speak to ITS / Vicky
2.1
16
Ongoing Agreement of energy standards of PC's with CEMS & IT
Te5
114
Ongoing Get Optimising firm into S block (and maybe library)to improve energy use
Te3
60
Ongoing Trial lighting saving system in Lecture rooms of different sizes by automatic controls
Tr3
5
Involvement in R Block Phase 2. V.important with Masterplanning etc.
Ongoing
4
11
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
Lighting Controls for Classrooms starting with areas open 5-9pm Te10
3.2
26
32
Many installed, potential for many more installations.
86
Trial at Bower Ashton - not likely at Frenchay.
Ongoing Site Voltage reductions at Sub Transformers 1
25
3
Te12
Immersion heating for Bower and Cannon Kitson 6
16
8
2
13
10
Carbon Saving Measure
P/B yrs
Total 5yr Cost
Total 5yr Save
Payback/Comment
Install free cooling working to reduce/remove cooling on future refurb. LINK
1.5
7
30
Need experience of alternatives
Restrict space temperatures in Winter to 23C where possible
1
10
24
3
Te16
Fan Turndown due to presence as per S block survey, Charles Darwin survey 6
Te22
Completed at Bower Ashton, abandoned at Cannon Kitson VSDs installed commissioning still required.
Actions for 2010 onwards Ref
Year
Te9
5 ongoing
Te11
5 ongoing
Te24
5 ongoing
A1
5 ongoing
D2
5 ongoing
D4
5 ongoing
Page 29
Not poss. All areas
LED lighting replacement where suitable across university
5
25
25
Internal electrical expertise used to identify locations
Provide Faculties with energy use data of the buildings they use
n/a
10
0
Required to engage Faculties
3
8
18
To improve monitoring
3
15
25
First phase complete
Meter Chillers to BMS M&T project - completion of second phase.
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
P1
6
P3
6
P5
Purchase Assessment for all Sizeable Equipment includes Energy Element >£20k Monitor/Encourage night switch off, possible overtime of security/porters
3
30
128
1
35
100
Re-schedule Evening use to limited rooms/ Wings/Buildings.
0.5
20
59
Energy Champions with 25% of Savings to Faculties, including Externally supported training
10
278
56
6
Will pay dividends long-term Investigation & action Short, but takes time and will to change timetabling Senior Mgt + Finance Support
P6
6
Tr1
6
Trial Sava Watt P Block - Electronic device to reduce power use for DX units
1.5
10
30
6
Trial demonstration of linking cooling to Presence Detection on Existing Rooms
4
1
3
Only cost effective when enlarged
6
Improve thermal insulation of boiler rooms and plantrooms.
2
5
8
Company to carry out free survey
6
Replace B block and Q blocks with settable TRV’s , provided temp sensors not in corridors
1.3
6
6
Provide cooler corridors
6
Carry out energy audit of all buildings on New Lands
n/a
4
0
Savings dependant on survey outcome
Following Te17 progress Biomass project at Bower Ashton
6.5
40
30
2
13
59
Tr4 Te13 Te18 Te25
Te27
D1
Page 30
6
6
Set up automated monitoring system to pick out effectiveness by day/week on metered heating and cooling systems. Hence to be able to quickly identify which control strategies are most effective. Highlight problems.
Quotation
Costs dependent on CAPEX split with BCC Can cut down on Energy Managers investigation time
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
7
P2
Purchase questions included for all small purchases as part of procurement of new equipment <£20k Presence detectors to operate A/C systems in all but PC rooms
Long term player 4.2
15
38
2
22
36
1.5
12
57
3
41
39
7
Te2
7
Te8
Install Presence detection in all DX Spilt rooms LINK Sava Watt to Air Conditioners across site LINK
7
Te15
Complete all actions on energy survey of New Lands LINK Te 25 Te26
7
Te23
7/8
Te28
7/8
L1
Review list of all previous Energy audits Complete new energy audit to identify actions for 2013 - 2020
12
Review of audits Costs and savings dependant on survey outcome
Consolidation of St.Matthias staff into existing Frenchay buildings
??
£68k
Total cost and P/B TBC Annual saving quoted
Consolidation of Glenside campus into new buildings on Frenchay Campus
??
£76k
Total cost and P/B TBC Annual saving quoted
New build and demolish existing FAS building
??
£15k
Total cost and P/B TBC Annual saving quoted
Large scale refurbishment of remaining Frenchay building stock
??
£88k
Total cost and P/B TBC Annual saving quoted
Large scale refurbishment of remaining Bower Ashton building stock
??
£11k
Total cost and P/B TBC Annual saving quoted
9/10 L4
11/12 L5
9/10
Double Trial payback
60
4
9/10 L3
await results
Costs and savings dependant on survey outcome
7/8 L2
Page 31
Tech to detail with JCW
Higher Education Carbon Management Initiative
L6
9 onwards L7
Second energy audit of all building stock to detail further projects
11/12
Page 32
Include energy efficiency measures in masterplanning developments
£0
£5k
n/a
n/a
Total cost and P/B TBC Annual saving quoted
