Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Management Of Hypertension

   EMBED


Share

Transcript

MANAGEMENT of HYPERTENSION R. Michael Culpepper, M.D. University of South Alabama DISCLOSURE Any Drug or Product Mentioned in this Discussion is Purely Illustrative and not a Commercial Endorsement All Opinions Expressed Are the Biases of the Speaker (Which are Considerable) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National High Blood Pressure Education Program U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Eighth Report of the The Seventh Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 8) JNC 8 JNC 8 The Issues & Expectations 1. Emphasizing evidence from clinical trials 2. Defining hypertension (When to initiate treatment) 3. Defining treatment targets (How low should BP be lowered in particular patients) 4. Emphasizing multi-drug approaches (Which drugs best achieve control to target) 5. Defining important co-morbid conditions JNC 8 – The Quest for Evidence WHAT IS HYPERTENSION? A Blood Pressure Or A Disease Process Blood Pressure Classification BP Classification SBP mmHg Normal <120 and <80 Prehypertension 120–139 or 80–89 Stage 1 Hypertension 140–159 or 90–99 Stage 2 Hypertension >160 or >100 DBP mmHg Cumulative CV Risk with “Non-Hypertensive” BP (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mm Hg) NEJM 345:1291, 2001 PATTERNS OF AMBULATORY BP White Coat Hypertension Hypertensive Dipping Masked Hypertension Hypertensive Non-Dipping J Clin Hypertension 14:836, 2012 MASKED HYPERTENSION Relative CV Risk in Diabetics Untreated Normotensive Masked Treated Day 120/74 mm Hg 120/73 mm Hg Night 104/60 mm Hg 141/84 mm Hg Hypertension 61:964, 2013 MASKED HYPERTENSION CV Events and Mortality Hypertension 61:278, 2013 HOME BP MONITORING Correlation to Ambulatory Monitoring Classification and Management of BP for adults BP classification Normal SBP* mmHg DBP* mmHg Lifestyle modification <120 and <80 Encourage Initial drug therapy Without compelling indication Prehypertension 120–139 or 80–89 Yes No antihypertensive drug indicated. Stage 1 Hypertension Yes Thiazide-type diuretics for most. May consider ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB, or combination. Yes Two-drug combination for most† (usually thiazide-type diuretic and ACEI or ARB or BB or CCB). Stage 2 Hypertension 140–159 or 90–99 >160 or >100 *Treatment determined by highest BP category. †Initial combined therapy should be used cautiously in those at risk for orthostatic hypotension. ‡Treat patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes to BP goal of <130/80 mmHg. With compelling indications Drug(s) for compelling indications. ‡ Drug(s) for the compelling indications.‡ Other antihypertensive drugs (diuretics, ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB) as needed. NON-DRUG THERAPY In NON-HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS Dietary Sodium & Potassium “Americans consume too much salt” www.cdc.gov/features/dsSodium Dietary Potassium Intake in U.S. Sodium (2,300 mg) MALE Potassium (4,400 mg) 4,043 mg 3,060 mg FEMALE 3,031 mg 2,373 mg WHITE 3,478 mg 2,720 mg BLACK 3,270 mg *2,219 mg “PRIMITIVE” Potassium/Sodium Intake (30-50 yo) (>20 yo) 4 - 10 www.ars.usda.gov/services/docs.htm?docid=18349 SALT RESISTANCE IN HYPERTENSION R = Salt-resistant S = Salt-sensitive 35-50% White HTN 65-80% Black HTN N = Normotensive H = Hypertensive J Clin Hypertension 7:170, 2013 META-ANALYSIS OF BENEFIT OF SALT REDUCTION BMJ 346:f1378, 2013 Risk of Stroke Relation to Urinary Sodium Excretion JAMA 306:2229, 2011 EFFECT OF HIGHER POTASSIUM INTAKE INCIDENT CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS BMJ 346:f1378, 2013 Risk of Stroke Relation to Urinary Potassium Excretion JAMA 306:2229, 2011 WHAT IS APPROPRIATE TARGET FOR BP TREATMENT? TARGET BLOOD PRESSURE Anti-Hypertensive Care “Uncomplicated Hypertension (1o CAD Prevention) < 140/90 mm Hg CAD / Stable Angina < 130/80 mm Hg High CAD Risk (DM, CKD, CAD-Equiv) < 130/80 mm Hg LV Dysfunction < 120/80 mm Hg Diabetic or Proteinuric CKD < 130/80 mm Hg African-American < 130/80 mm Hg Rosendorf, et al. Circulation 115:2761. 2007. JNC 7. JAMA 289:2560, 2003. BENEFIT OF LOWER BP TARGET? European Society of Hypertension Task Force J Hypertension 27:2121, 2009 TIGHT vs USUAL BP TARGETS DM with CAD – CV Outcomes INVEST Trial 6400 patients Age > 50 yr Diabetic Hx CAD 75+% on ACE I + Non-DHP CCB Β-Blocker HCTZ Systolic BP Uncontrolled (SBP > 140)   (146 mmHg) Usual          (SPB 130‐139) (131 mmHg) Tight               (SPB < 130) (122 mmHg) JAMA 304:61, 2010 INTENSIVE BP CONTROL IN DM The ACCORD‐BP Trial 4733 pts Type 2 DM:  > 40 yo + CV disease   OR > 55 yo + ASHD, LVH, albuminuria  Non‐Fatal MI or CVA, CV Death Primary Outcome:  Non‐Fatal MI or CVA; CV Death Intensive Rx: Hypotension Creatinine Macroalbuminuria N Eng J Med 362:1575, 2010 SUB-TYPE of HYPERTENSION as FUNCTION of AGE in US Systolic BP > 140 Diastolic BP < 90 Systolic BP > 140 Diastolic BP > 90 Systolic BP < 140 DiastolicBP > 90 Hypertension:37869, 2011 TARGET BP IN THE ELDERLY THE HYVET TRIAL 3845 pts 83.6 yo 173/91 mmHg Baseline BP Death-Any Cause Heart Failure ൎ reach target BP 150/80 mmHg NEJM 358:1887, 2008 ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE DRUG CHOICES Is There a Difference in Drugs? TIME TO BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL BENEFIT OF EARLY LOWERING OF BP Lessons from VALUE Trial Myocardial Infarction * * Amlodipine – Valsartan BP Difference vs Time Val Amlo Stroke Stroke Val Amlo Lancet 363:2022, 2004 V A V A SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND STROKE Absolute SBP or Variability in Value BENEFIT OF LOWERING SYSTOLIC BP For REDUCTION IN STROKE J Clin Hypertension 13:693, 2011 SBP VARIANCE BY DRUG CLASS Meta-analysis of 7 Trials 140,866 Patient/Drug Events Lancet 375:906, 2010 RISK OF CV EVENT BY SBP VARIABILITY Relationship to Drug Class Stroke Risk Coronary Risk Amlodipine Atenolol ≈ 5500 pts Dutch TIA UK-TIA ASCOT-BPLA Lancet 375:895,2010 RISK OF STROKE (y axis) vs VARIANCE RATIO OF DRUG “A” to DRUG “B” DIURETICS Is There a Difference? HCTZ vs Chlorthalidone CV Relative Risk Reduction by BP Decrement Hypertension 59:110, 2012 HCTZ vs Chlorthalidone Network Analysis from Clinical Trials Hypertension 59:110, 2012 DOSING ANTI-HYPERTENSIVES Is Time of Day a Factor? CHRONO-THERAPY OF RAAS INHIBITION Implications for ACE I / ARB Dosing VALSARTAN Chronobiol Int 22:755, 2005 TELMISARTAN Hypertension 50: 755, 2007 CHRONO-THERAPY FOR HYPERTENSION Advantage of Nocturnal Dosing * Non-Dippers: < 10% fall in nocturnal BP from daytime average J Clin Hypertension 15:48 RESISTANT HYPERTENSION Uncontrolled BP on 3 drugs of different classes, one of which is a Diuretic Controlled BP requiring 4 or more drugs of different classes RESISTANT HYPERTENSION Aldosterone Antagonism Canadian J Cardiol, 2012 RESISTANT HYPERTENSION Renal Sympathetic Nerve Ablation RENAL SYMPATHETIC NERVE ABLATION Blood Pressure Outcomes Eur Heart J, 2011 EXTRACTS FROM EUROPEAN SOCIETY HTN Treatment Initiation Stage I – drug therapy after suitable lifestyle modification Hi Normal – No evidence for drug therapy benefit Diabetic – Treat for organ damage (albuminuria) Prior CV Event – No evidence of benefit if normotensive Blood Pressure Goals All patients – goal < 140/90 mmHg appropriate (?elderly) Diabetic – no evidence of benefit of goal < 130 mmHg SBP CV Disease – goal of 120/75 mmHg has soft support Elderly Proportional benefit at age > 65 yr same as younger pts No demonstrated benefit in SBP lowering < 140 mmHg All drug classes beneficial EXTRACT FROM EUROPEAN SOCIETY HTN Choice of Drug Major drug classes – no difference in ability to lower BP No undisputable evidence that drugs differ in regard to ability of protect from cardio-vascular events Ranking of drugs as 1st, 2nd, 3rd line agents has little merit but particular patients may be more responsive to certain drug classes Combination Therapy 2-drug Regimen – required in vast majority of patients Single pill combination advised for adherence to therapy ACE I / ARB / CCB + Thiazide diuretic of proven benefit β-blocker + diuretic and ACE I + ARB not recommended 3-drug Regimen – ACEI/ARB + CCB + Diuretic beneficial JNC 8 ? Possible Recommendations? 1. No BP goals < 140/90 mm Hg 2. BP goal for patients 65+ year old, < 150/90 mm Hg 3. 1st Line therapy: ACE I, ARB, CCB, Thiazide Chlorthalidone favored over HCTZ 4. β-blocker not a 1st line choice for HTN Vaso-dilating β-blockers drugs of choice 5. Preferred combinations ACE I / CCB ACE I / Thiazide 6. Spironolactone addition in resistant HTN 7. Home BP or ambulatory BP encouraged El fin Das Ende OUR PROBLEM Hypertension in the Southeast US is higher than other regions ?GOOD? NEWS Anti-hypertension drug treatment is higher in the Southeast US than other regions