Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Mcloskey Epaseac 90 Minute Ef Handout

   EMBED


Share

Transcript

Executive  Functions   Improving  Executive   Functions:   Strategies   to  Change   the   Brain   and  Change   Behavior   Presented   by George   McCloskey,   Ph.D. Philadelphia   College   of  Osteopathic   Medicine [email protected]   or   [email protected]   1 2 Michael  Posner – Naïve:     First  exposure  to  the  task;;   responses  required  immediately. – Practiced:     Time  given  to  rehearse   responses  to  the  task;;  responses delivered  after  rehearsal  period. 3 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 1 Executive  Functions   System   1  – Fast,   effortless,   automatic System   2  – Slow,  effortful, non-­automatic 5 Things   that  are  Taught   to  Automaticity   in  Early  Elementary  School § Basic  math   facts  and  multiplication   tables § The   alphabet   and  sight  word   recognition Key  Concept Executive  functions   are   used   to  c ue,   direct,  coordinate   and   integrate   all  the   processes,  skills,   abilities,  and   knowledge   bases   used   when   reading   writing   or   doing   math. 8 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 2 Executive  Functions   An  Integrative  Model  Specifying  Processes,  Abilities,  Knowledge  Bases,   Skills,  Memory  and  Achievement  in  Reading indicate Executive Function processing at work Retrieval from Long Term Storage Working Memory Initial Registration (Immediate Memory) General & Specific Knowledge Lexicons Language Semantic Lexicon Word & Phrase Knowledge Reasoning Visuospatial Comprehending Words and Text Decoding Unfamiliar and/or Nonsense Words Speed + Prosody = Reading Rate aka “Fluency” Reading Familiar (Sight) Words Phonological Processing Interventions  f or  Executive  Functions   Difficulties  Related  t o  Reading Many  executive  functions  difficulties   related   to  reading   are   the  result  of  a   lack  of  adequate   maturation   of  the   neural   networks   involved  in   the  use   of  these  executive  functions  for   reading.   Oral Motor Functioning Processing Cop yrig ht © 2007Orthographic Georg e M cCloskey, Ph.D. 9 Interventions  f or  Executive  Functions   Difficulties  Related  t o  Reading 10 Things   that  are  Taught   to  Automaticity   in  Early  Elementary  School The  most  effective  form  of  intervention   for  maturational  difficulties  with  executive   functions  cues  is  increased  practice  of   the  complete  act  of  reading,  i.e.,  applying   the  integration  of  all  processes,  skills,   abilities  and  lexicons  while  reading   connected  text  while  receiving  feedback   from  an  external  source.   § Basic  math   facts  and  multiplication   tables § The   alphabet   and  sight  word   recognition § Graphomotor functioning   for  quick   handwriting   of  letters  and   words 11 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 3 Executive  Functions   An  Integrative  Model  Specifying  Processes,  Abilities,  Knowledge   Bases,   Skills,  Memory  and  Achievement  in  Writing indicate Executive Function processing at work Initial Registration (Immediate Memory) Working Memory Retrieval from Long Term Storage General & Specific Knowledge Lexicons Language Semantic Lexicon Word & Phrase Knowledge Idea Generation Reasoning Visuospatial Text Editing & Revising Text Generation Text Transcription & Spelling Visuospatial Processing Cop yrig h t ©Processing 2007 Georg e Orthographic McClosk ey, Ph .D. Text Production Automaticity – Novel:    Second  exposure  to  the   task,  but  responses  required   immediately  to  a  set  of  all  new  items. GraphoMotor Processing Phonological Processing 13 – Naïve:    First  exposure   to   the  task;;   responses   required   immediately;;   high   demand   for  executive   functions   (EFs) – Practiced:    Time   given   to  rehearse   responses   to   the   task;;  minimal  demand   for  EFs – Novel:    Second   exposure   to   the  task,  but   responses   required   immediately   to  a  set  of   all   new   items;;  moderate   demand   for  Efs – Source:     Posner,   M.I.  &   Raichle,  M.E.  (1994).    Images   of   Mind. 16 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 4 Executive  Functions   Behavior  Observation  and   Inferences  about  Brain  Function Key  Concept Assessment  of  the   Use  or  Disuse  of   Executive  Functions   Hinges  on  Careful   Observation  of   Behavior.   What’s  the  difference   between   a   Similarities  Scaled   Score  of  12   (75th percentile)   …   …and   a  Similarities   Scaled  Score   of  12  (75th percentile)? 17 Key  Concept Key  Concept Task  Performance    is   directed  by  Executive   Functions  or  an   Executive  Functions   substitute. The  neural  networks  used  to   perform  a  task  depend  on   perceptions  about  how  the   task  should  be  done. 19 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions Most  of  what   a   teacher,   therapist,   or   work   supervisor   says   to  student,  client,  or   worker   is  intended   to   activate  specific   neural   networks   within   that  person’s   brain. 20 5 Executive  Functions   Key  Concept The  W isdom  of  Kurt  Lewin The  more  specific  the   language  used  by  a   teacher,  therapist  or   supervisor  the  more  likely   it  is  that  the  student,   client  or  worker  will  be   activating  the  brain   networks  needed  for   effective  performance. “There  is   nothing  more  practical   than  a  good  theory.” Known  for  h is  field  theory   of behavior that   posits   that human  b ehavior is   a function of  an  individual’s   psychological  environment. 21 What   Are   Executive   Functions? “Despite  the  frequency  with  which  it  is   mentioned  in  the  neuropsychological  literature,   the  concept  of  executive  f unctions  is  one   that  still  awaits  a  f ormal  definition.     Research  efforts  aimed  at  exploring  the   different  aspects  of  this  c onstruct  have  often   yielded  contradictory  evidence,  r esulting  in  a   lack  of  clarity  and  even  c ontroversy  r egarding   the  true  nature  of  executive  abilities.”   Jurado &  Rosselli,  2007,  page  213. 22 EF  as  t he  Conductor  of  t he  Brain’s  O rchestra   or  CEO  of  t he  brain  ( i.e.,  EF  as  “g”) EF 23 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 6 Executive  Functions   Thoughts Key   Concept EFs Executive  Functions: Perceptions § § § § Emotions § Actions Executive  Functions  Are  Not  a  Unitary  Trait Appropriate   Metaphors   for   Executive   Functions: § The   conductor   and   section   leaders   of  the   mind’s  Orchestra   § The   management   structure   of  a   multinational   mind  corporation § The   coaching   staff  of  team   mind Directive  capacities  o f  the  mind Multiple  in  n ature,  n ot  a  single   capacity Part  o f  n eural  circuits  that  a re   routed  through  the  frontal  lobes Cue  the  u se  o f  o ther  mental   capacities Direct  a nd  control  p erceptions,   thoughts,  a ctions,  a nd  to  some   degree  e motions The   Management   Structure   within   a  Holarchical EF Model   of  EF Trans-Self Integration EF EF SelfRealization ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef ef ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es SelfDetermination ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Self-Regulation Self-Activation McCloskey  – Executive  Functions ef/es ef/es ef/es ef ef ef ef/es Self-Generation EF Activation 7 Executive  Functions   Domains of Functioning Directed by Executive Functions E m o t i o n Action Cognition Perception Action Executive control of modes of output including behavior in the external world and storage and retrieval of internal representations Cognition Executive control of thoughts and thought processing The   Management   Structure   within   a  Holarchical Model   of  EF EF Trans-Self Integration SelfRealization ef/es ef/es ef/es Executive Functions ES Self-Activation ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Activation Management   Structure   within  a  Holarchical Model   of  EF EF Trans-Self Integration EF ef EF ef ef Self-Generation EF ef ef Self-Realization Self-Awareness Other-Awareness Self-Analysis ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Self-Determination e ef/es f/ Self-Regulation e ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es s Monitor ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Perceive ef/es Focus Correct Goal setting Long-range Planning & Foresight ef/es Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate ES Activation McCloskey  – Executive  Functions ef/es ef/es EF Executive Skills ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es SelfDetermination ef ef ef ef/es Self-Generation EF Self-Regulation EF ES EF ES ef/es ef/es ef/es Emotion Executive control of moods, feelings, and the processing of emotions Executive Capacities ef ef ef/es ef/es Perception Executive control of modes of perceptual input including external sensory stimuli (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) and internal (representational) stimuli Management   Structure   within  a  Holarchical Model   of  EF EF EF EF Balance Gauge Anticipate Estimate   Time Analyze Generate Associate Organize Prioritize Plan Evaluate/Compare Decide Sense  Time Pace Sequence Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve Self-Activation 8 Executive  Functions   Self  Regulation   Executive  Functions Key  Concept Executive  Functions  involve  the  part  of   the  executive  network  that  that  is  used   to  become  aware  of  the  need  for  the use   of  executive  skills  and  other  mental   capacities  and  used  to  cue  and  direct   the  use  of  the  needed                                 executive  skills.   It  is  important  to   distinguish  between Executive   Functions   and   Executive   Skills. 33 Self  Regulation   Executive   Skills 34 EF  Tiers  within   the  Holarchical   Model   of  Executive   Functions Trans-Self Integration EF Executive  Skills  are   responsible   for   cueing   the  specific  areas   of  the   brain   needed   to  perform   specific   tasks  (e.g.,  attending,   inhibiting,   modulating,   planning,                 organizing,                                           associating). Self-Generation EF ef EF ef ef EF ef Self-Realization ef Self-Determination Self-Awareness Other-Awareness Self-Analysis e ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es f/ ef/es e ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es s ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Goal setting Long-range Planning & Foresight Self-Regulation Perceive Focus Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate Monitor Correct Balance Gauge Anticipate Estimate   Time Analyze Generate Associate Organize Prioritize Plan Evaluate/Compare Decide Sense  Time Pace Sequence Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve Self-Activation 35 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions Activation 9 Executive  Functions   Self  Regulation 33  Self-­Regulation  EFs § A  set  of  control   capacities  that  cue   and   direct  functioning   across  the   domains   of  perception,   emotion,   cognition,   and   action § The   current   model   posits  33   self-­ regulation   executive  functions ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es 37 Perceive Focus Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate § § § § § § § § § § § Balance Monitor Correct Gauge Anticipate Est Time Analyze Generate Associate Plan Organize § § § § § § § § § § § Prioritize Compare/Eval Decide Sense  Time Pace Sequence Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve Self  Regulation   Executive   Function   “Clusters” Key  Concept ENGAGEMENT Self-­regulation   Executive  Functions   can  be  organized   into  7  basic  c lusters. 39 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions § § § § § § § § § § § ATTENTION Perceive   Focus Sustain MEMORY Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Pause Flexible   Shift OPTIMIZATION EFFICIENCY Sense   Time Monitor Pace Modulate Sequence   Balance Execute Correct INQUIRY Anticipate Gauge Analyze Estimate  Time Compare SOLUTION Generate Associate Prioritize Plan Organize Decide 40 10 Executive  Functions   Key  Concept Tools  of  the  Mind   (Bodrova &  Leong)   is   an   effective  preschool   /kindergarten   curriculum   that  helps   young   children   improve   self-­regulation   executive  functions. Tools  of  t he   Mind Elena  Bodrova &  Deborah   Leong 41 Bronson  &   Merryman discuss  t heir   observations  of   the  Tools  of  t he   Mind   curriculum  in   Chapter  8   Can  Self-­ Control  Be   Taught? 43 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 42 EF  Tiers  within   the  Holarchical   Model   of  Executive   Functions EF Trans-Self Integration EF EF ef ef ef Self-Generation EF ef ef Self-Realization Self-Awareness Other-Awareness Self-Analysis ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es e ef/es f / ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es e ef/essef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Activation Self-Determination Goal setting Long-range Planning & Foresight Self-Regulation Perceive Focus Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate Monitor Correct Balance Gauge Anticipate Estimate   Time Analyze Generate Associate Organize Prioritize Plan Evaluate/Compare Decide Sense  Time Pace Sequence Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve Self-Activation 11 Executive  Functions   Self  Activation Holarchy vs Hierarchy Hierarchy Initiation   and  “ramping  up”  of   basic  executive  functions   related  to  an  awakened  state   of  mind  and  to  overcoming   sleep  inertia. Self-Activation Holarchy 45 Holoarchy vs  Hierarchy Key  Concept § Within  a  hierarchy,  the  next  s tage  of   development  does  not  begin  until  the   stage  preceding  it  is  complete. § Within  a  holarchy,  additional  stages  of   development  c an  begin  before  earlier   stages  are  c ompleted;;  earlier  s tages  c an   continue  to  develop  after  later  s tages   begin;;  multiple  stages  may  be  developing   at  the  same  time;;  later  s tages  may  be   better  developed  than  earlier  s tages. Executive   Functions  cue   and  direct  in   different  ways  at   different  levels. 47 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 48 12 Executive  Functions   EF  Tiers  within   the  Holarchical   Model   of  Executive   EF Functions Trans-Self Integration EF EF ef ef Self-Generation EF ef ef ef Self-Realization Self-Determination Self-Awareness Other-Awareness Self-Analysis ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es e ef/es f/ Self-Regulation e ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es s Monitor ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Perceive ef/es Focus Correct Goal setting Long-range Planning & Foresight ef/es Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate Balance Gauge Anticipate Estimate   Time Analyze Generate Associate Organize Prioritize Plan Evaluate/Compare Decide Sense  Time Pace Sequence Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve Self-Activation Activation ef EF ef ef Self-Generation EF ef § Directs  cognitive  processes  that   engage  in  awareness  of  self  and   others,  reflection  about  self  and   others  and  self-­analysis. § Cues  cognitive  processes  to  access   accumulated  information  about  self   and  apply  it  in  specific  situations. EF 50 EF  Tiers  within   the  Holarchical   Model   of  Executive   Functions EF Trans-Self Integration EF Self  Realization   (of   self   &  others) ef Self-Realization Self-Awareness Other-Awareness Self-Analysis Self-Determination e ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es f/ ef/es Self-Regulation e ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es s Perceive Monitor ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Focus Correct ef/es Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate Goal setting Long-range Planning & Foresight Balance Gauge Anticipate Estimate   Time Analyze Generate Associate Organize Prioritize Plan Evaluate/Compare Decide Sense  Time Pace Sequence Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve Self  Determination EF § Foresight/Long-­Term  Planning  and   Goal  Generation § Directs  the  use  of  cognitive  processes   to  construct  visions  of  the  future  and   plans  for  action  over  longer                 periods  of  time.      Attempts  to            to align  daily  self-­regulation                                   with  long-­term  goals. Self-Activation Activation McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 52 13 Executive  Functions   Chapter 21 Motivational Interviewing with Adolescents and Young Adults John S. Baer and Peggy L. Peterson 53 EF  Tiers  within   the  Holarchical   Model   of  Executive   EF Functions Trans-Self Integration EF ef EF ef ef Self-Generation EF ef ef Self-Realization Self-Awareness Other-Awareness Self-Analysis ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Self-Determination e ef/es f/ Self-Regulation e ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es s Monitor ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Perceive ef/es Focus Correct Goal setting Long-range Planning & Foresight ef/es Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate Activation Balance Gauge Anticipate Estimate   Time Analyze Generate Associate Organize Prioritize Self-Activation McCloskey  – Executive  Functions Plan Evaluate/Compare Decide Sense  Time Pace Sequence Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve 54 Self  Generation EF § Directs  the  posing  of  speculative  questions   related  to  the  meaning  and  purpose  of  life   and/or  the  ultimate  source(s)  of  r eality  and   physical  existence,  mind-­body  r elationships,   spirit,  and  soul;;  contemplates  existence   beyond  the  physical  plane. § Directs  the  generation  of  a  philosophy  of  life   used  to  guide  self-­awareness,  s elf-­realization   and  the  other  levels  of  executive  function   processes;;  s erves  as  a  basis  for  an  ultimate   source  of  intentional  behavior  direction. 56 14 Executive  Functions   EF  Tiers  within   the  Holarchical   Model   of  Executive   EF Functions Trans-Self Integration EF ef EF ef ef Self-Generation EF ef ef Self-Realization Self-Awareness Other-Awareness Self-Analysis ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Self-Determination e ef/es f/ Self-Regulation e ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es s Monitor ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es ef/es Perceive ef/es Focus Correct Goal setting Long-range Planning & Foresight ef/es Sustain Energize Initiate Inhibit Stop Interrupt Flexible Shift Modulate Activation Balance Gauge Anticipate Estimate   Time Analyze Generate Associate Organize Prioritize Plan Evaluate/Compare Decide Sense  Time Pace Sequence Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve Trans-­Self   Integration EF § Directs  the  engagement  of  mental   processes  that  enable  r ealization  and   experiencing  of  a  trans-­self  s tate  of   ultimate  or  unity  c onsciousness. § In  most  s piritual  traditions,  this  s tate  is   considered  the  highest  achievement  of   human  c onsciousness  and  therefore  v ery   different  from  the  maladaptive  states   characteristic  of  c linical  diagnoses  of   dissociative  s tates. Self-Activation 58 Arenas   of  Involvement Key  Concept Effective  use  of   Executive  Functions   can  vary  by  Arena  of   Involvement  as  well   as  by  Domain  of   Functioning. Intrapersonal Control   of  Self  in   Relation   to  Self Interpersonal Control   of  Self  in   Relation   to  Others Environment Control   of  Self  in   Relation   to   Surroundings Symbol   System   Control   of  Self  in   Relation   to  Academics   (Reading,   Writing,  Math) 59 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 15 Executive  Functions   Key  Concept EF  Development   -­ Not! Executive  Functions   are  developing  from   birth;;  maturational   delays  c an  cause   difficulties. 61 Executive   Function   Development EF  Development   -­ 63 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 62 Some   EF-­based   clinical  syndromes,   such  as  ADHD,   demonstrate   clear   patterns   of  delayed   developmental   progression.    Barkley  (1998)   estimates  developmental   delays  of   about   30%  associated   with  various   EF  processes  such  as  Inhibit,   Manipulate,   Shift,  Sustain,  Time,   Monitor,   Correct. 64 16 Executive  Functions   EF  Development  does  not  progress   by  continuous   equal  intervals Developmental Progression with a 30% Delay 100 90 80 E F 70 A G E 50 E Q 20 60 40 30 10 0 6      8    10                15        21  30        39    60      90       Chronological  Age 66 65 EF  Development  does  not  progress   by  continuous   equal  intervals DAILY  PROGRESS  BY  CLASS ENGAGEMENT Math Science Social  Studies English Reading Math  Facts 67 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions WEEK  1 4-­‐Feb 5-­‐Feb 6-­‐Feb 7-­‐Feb 8-­‐Feb 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 3 ENGAGEMENT Math Science Social  Studies English Reading Math  Facts WEEK  5 4-­‐Mar 5-­‐Mar 6-­‐Mar 7-­‐Mar 8-­‐Mar 3 3 3 1 3 0 2 1 3 3 3 2 1 3 2 2 3 1 3 3 3 2 3 0 3 0 3 3 ENGAGEMENT Math Science Social  Studies English Reading Math  Facts WEEK  9 1-­‐Apr 2-­‐Apr 3-­‐Apr 4-­‐Apr 5-­‐Apr 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ENGAGEMENT Math Science Social  Studies English Reading Math  Facts WEEK  2 11-­‐Feb 12-­‐Feb 13-­‐Feb 14-­‐Feb 15-­‐Feb 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 3 3 3 0 3 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 WEEK  6 11-­‐Mar 12-­‐Mar 13-­‐Mar 14-­‐Mar 15-­‐Mar 3 2 1 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 WEEK  10 15-­‐Apr 16-­‐Apr 17-­‐Apr 18-­‐Apr 19-­‐Apr 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 3 1 3 3 3 2 0 1 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 WEEK  13 6-­‐May 7-­‐May 8-­‐May 9-­‐May 10-­‐May 0 1 0 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 WEEK  3 19-­‐Feb 20-­‐Feb 21-­‐Feb 22-­‐Feb 23-­‐Feb 1 0 3 0 3 3 3 2 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 WEEK  4 25-­‐Feb 26-­‐Feb 27-­‐Feb 28-­‐Feb 1-­‐Mar 0 3 2 2 3 0 2 2 0 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 WEEEK  7 18-­‐Mar 19-­‐Mar 20-­‐Mar 21-­‐Mar 22-­‐Mar 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 WEEK  11 22-­‐Apr 23-­‐Apr 24-­‐Apr 25-­‐Apr 26-­‐Apr 0 0 3 3 3 3 0 3 1 3 1 13-­‐May 2 0 0 2 14-­‐May 0 1 3 3 WEEK  14 15-­‐May WEEK  8 25-­‐Mar 26-­‐Mar 27-­‐Mar 28-­‐Mar 29-­‐Mar 1 0 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 WEEK  12 29-­‐Apr 30-­‐Apr 1-­‐May 2-­‐May 3-­‐May 3 0 0 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 0 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 16-­‐May 1 1 0 2 2 17-­‐May 1 0 0 0 3 68 3 17 Executive  Functions   END  OF  YEAR  SUMMARY  ALL  CLASSES ENGAGEMENT Rated  3 ,  2 ,  or  1 Rated  0 ATTENTION Rated  3 ,  2 ,  or  1 Rated  0 WORK   COMPLETION Rated  3 ,  2 ,  or  1 Rated  0 Key  Concept % 78% 22% % 78% 22% % 70% 30% McCloskey  – Executive  Functions Intervention  efforts  r equire  a   therapeutic  perspective  that   emphasizes  a  G rowth   Mindset  over  a  Fixed  Mindset   and  a  patient  belief  in  the   idea  that  EF  difficulties  “won’t   last  forever;;  but  probably   longer  than  y ou  would  like.” 69 70 71 72 18 Executive  Functions   Zeno’s  Paradox Langer:   Reverse   Zeno’s  Paradox § An  arrow  is  released  at  a  target. § At  any  point  in  the  arrows  flight   toward  the  target,  the  distance   between  the  arrow  and  the  target  can   be  halved. § Mathematically,  the  distance  between   the  arrow  and  the  target  therefore  can   be  halved  infinitely  such  that  the   arrow  never  really  reaches  the  target. § Every  intervention  starts  with  an  infinitely   small  step  toward  positive  growth. § Each  successive  s tep  doubles  in  impact. § Response  to  intervention  therefore  may   not  be  noticeable  until  long  after  the   intervention  has  started. § Once  positive  change  is  detectable,  it   seems  to  increase  dramatically  in  a  short   period  of  time. 73 Reverse  Zeno’s  Paradox:     Jake’s  Case § Neurodevelopmental  complications   due  to   Polygyria § At  age  7  Jake  was  self-­regulating  at  a  5  month   level. § With   intensive  intervention,  a t  age  1 4  Jake  was   self-­regulating  at  a  5  ½  year  level. § Nearly   all  of  Jake’s  improvements   in  self-­ regulation  o ccurred  between  a ges  12  ½   and  1 4 § 7  years  of  intervention  with  gains  realized   only   in  the  last  18  months  of  that  time  period. 75 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 74 Key  Concept Virtually  all   individuals  who   struggle  with   psychological   disorders  exhibit   executive  function   difficulties. 76 19 Executive  Functions   Executive   Functions   and   Clinical  Diagnoses “Deficits  in  PFC  [prefrontal   cortex,  aka   frontal   lobes]  function  are   evident   in   every  neuropsychiatric   disorder   (indeed,   the  term   “psychiatric  problem”   seems  synonymous   with  PFC   dysfunction).” Arnsten &  Robbins  2002   in  Principles  of  Frontal   Lobe  Function Executive   Functions   and   Clinical  Diagnoses § Most  of  the  clinical  conditions   described  in  the  DSM-­V  reflect   some  form  of  Executive  Dysfunction § The  DSM-­V  can  be  thought  of  as  “A   User’s  Guide  to  All  the  Things  That   Can  Go  Wrong  With  the  Frontal   Lobes” Executive   Functions   and   Clinical  Diagnoses § A  sampling  of  conditions  involving  EF  deficits: § Autism    Asperger’s Syndrome     § ADHD  and  ADD § Conduct  Disorder § Oppositional  Defiant  Disorder § Depression  and/or  Anxiety     § Obsessive-­Compulsive  Disorder § Fetal  Alcohol  Syndrome     Key  Concept Executive   Function  Deficits ADHD All  individuals  with   ADHD  exhibit  EF   deficits  but  not  all   individuals  that   exhibit  EF  deficits   are  ADHD. 80 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 20 Executive  Functions   Executive  Functions   and  ADHD? Executive  Functions   and  ADHD All  individuals  with  ADHD  have  executive   functions  deficits… Executive   Function   Deficits ADHD …but  not  all  individuals  with  executive           functions  deficits  have  ADHD. 81 Different   Constellations Perceive Energize Shift Monitor Initiate Flexible Correct Interrupt Balance Executive  Functions   and  ADHD Est Time Anticipate Stop Gauge Sense Time Organize Sequence Plan Analyze Associate Evaluate Generate Decide Hold Manipulate Pace Store Execute Retrieve Focus Sustain Modulate Inhibit Alan  Age  10 Focus Sustain Modulate Inhibit Katie  Age  11 Same Core Perceive Energize Shift Monitor Initiate Flexible Correct Est Time Anticipate Stop Interrupt Analyze Associate Balance Gauge § EF  and  ADHD  are  not  synonymous  terms;;   rather  ADHD  is  a  condition  involving  EF   deficits  in: § Focus/Select,  Sustain,  Inhibit,  Modulate     § Nearly  all  persons  with  ADHD  also  have   additional  self-­regulation  difficulties;;  the   nature  of  these  additional  difficulties  is  what   makes  ADHD  s o  v ariable  from  one  person   to  the  next  and  what  causes  c onfusion  in   diagnosis. Generate Different   Constellations McCloskey  – Executive  Functions Organize Sense Time Plan Evaluate Decide Sequence Pace Execute Hold Manipulate Store Retrieve § Pharmacological  treatment  of  ADHD  usually   only  addresses  the  problems  associated   with  the  EFs  s pecific  to  ADHD  ( Inhibit,   Modulate,  Focus/Select,  Sustain) § Most  persons  with  ADHD  will  require   additional  interventions  to  assist  with  the   additional  self-­regulation  difficulties  that   persist  even  when  medication  is  being  used   effectively  to  treat  the  primary  ADHD   problems. 21 Executive  Functions   Key  Concept Executive   Functions   and   School § Although  executive  functions  are  used   to  guide  cognitive  processing  involved   in  new  learning,  many  new  learning   situations  are  s tructured  in  ways  that   reduce  the  need  for  s trong  executive   direction. § In  contrast,  demonstrating  what  has   been  learned  usually  r equires  s ignificant   involvement  of  executive  c ontrol   processes. Executive  Functions   activation  can  be   internally  or   externally  driven;;   EFs  c an  cue  the  use   of  learned  strategies. 86 Internal  versus  External  Control Internal   versus   External   Control The  neural  circuits  for  executive   function  activation  are  routed   differently  depending   on  whether   the  activation  is  based  on  an   internally  driven  desire  or   command  versus  an  external   demand. Because   internally   driven   production   is  much   easier   to  accomplish  than   externally   demanded   production   for   children   with   “producing   difficulties”   their   lack  of  production   on  demand   often  stands  in  stark  contrast  to  their   seemingly   effortless  production   “when   the  spirit  moves  them.” 87 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 88 22 Executive  Functions   Engagement  of  Self-­Regulation Internal   versus   External   Control External   Demand   Pathway The  on-­demand   deficiencies   observed  by  others  are  often   attributed  to  negative  personal   characteristics  s uch  as  lack  of   responsibility,  apathy,  passive   aggressive  s tance,  or   oppositional  defiance. Executive Functions External   Demand Internal Command ??? Nucleus Accumbens 89 Extrinsic Rewards   & Punishments Internal  Command  Pathway: Intrinsically   Rewarding 90 Engagement  of  Self-­Regulation Executive Functions Teach   how  to  self-­ regulate  in  a  way   that   increases   the  desire   to  self-­regulate External   Demand   Pathway Internal Command ??? Nucleus Accumbens 91 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions Internal  Command  Pathway: Intrinsically   Rewarding External   Demand Extrinsic Rewards   & Punishments 92 23 Executive  Functions   Production  based   on   External   Demand: Production  based   on Internal  Command: James  Age  10,  Rey  Complex  Figure  Copy: Self-­initiated Verbally  Mediated 93 Questions  about  Intelligence Martin’s  WISC  Score  Changes § Do  you  believe  it  is  possible  to   raise  a  child’s  FSIQ  from  70  to   100  through  intervention?   § Can  it  be  done  in  6  months?    A   year?    Two  years? 11/2010 4/2013 70 99 FSIQ 83 105 GAI 73 95 VCI 94 117 PRI/FRI -­‐-­‐ -­‐-­‐ VSI 62 97 WMI/AWMI 68 85 PSI 95 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 9/2015 103 108 106 112 111 94 98 24 Executive  Functions   Martin’s   Achievement  Score   Changes Key  Concept 11/2010 4/2013 9/2015 Wd Reading 71 94 98 Wd Decoding 81 97 98 Rdg Fluency 66 95 100 Rdg Comp -­‐-­‐ 87 82 Rdg Vocab -­‐-­‐ 93 112 vs Producing   difficulties   are   different   from   learning   difficulties;;   producing   difficulties   reflect  poor   use   of   executive  functions. 98 A  General   Model  for   Conceptualizing   Learning   and  Producing  Difficulties Producing   versus Learning Learning   Difficulties Only Executive  Function   difficulties  of   a  severe   nature   (especially   in   the  Symbol  System  Arena)   do   not  result   in  Learning   Difficulties;;   they  result  in  Producing   Difficulties. Learning   Difficulties And Producing   Difficulties Producing   Difficulties Only vs 99 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions Often  NOT  recognized  as  a   Learning   Disability,  even   when   severe,  unless  an   evaluation   involving  process   assessment  is  done Recognized  fairly  quickly   as  a  Learning   Disability When   severe,  typically   attributed  to  lack  of   motivation,  character  f laws,     or  behavior/personality   problems 100 25 Executive  Functions   EF  Intervention  Continuum Executive   Function   Difficulties Orienting   Strategies External  Control  Strategies Bridging   Strategies Internal  Control   Strategies § Are  they  the  result  of: § Disuse  through  Conscious   Choice § Innate  Deficiency § Maturational  Delay § Disuse  through   Nonconscious  Choice Key  Concept Intervention  efforts  r equire  a   therapeutic  perspective  that   emphasizes  a  G rowth   Mindset  over  a  Fixed  Mindset   and  a  patient  belief  in  the   idea  that  EF  difficulties  “won’t   last  forever;;  but  probably   longer  than  y ou  would  like.” 103 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions 104 26 Executive  Functions   EF  Intervention  Continuum Key  Concept Orienting   Strategies External  Control  Strategies Bridging   Strategies Internal  Control   Strategies Orienting  Strategies   increase  awareness  of   executive  functions   and  expectations  for   their  use  and  provide   self-­regulation  goals   for  students.     106 Key  Concept Key  Concept External  Control   strategies  enable   students  to  perform   more  effectively  but  do   not  necessarily  help  to   improve  students’   capacity  for  self-­ regulated  performance. 107 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions Bridging  strategies   effect  the  gradual   transition  from   external  control  to   self-­regulated   internal  control. 108 27 Executive  Functions   Bridging  Strategies Key  Concept Once  learned  and   practiced,  Internal   Control  Strategies   enable  students  to   effectively  “run  their   own  shows.”   Encourage  the   engagement  of   executive  functions   through  the  use  of   reflective  questioning 110 Chapter  10:     Interventions   for  Students   with  Executive   Skills  and   Executive   Functions   Difficulties 111 McCloskey  – Executive  Functions George   McCloskey Caitlin   Gilmartin Betti Stanco 112 28