Transcript
Helman
Springs
Subdivision
Application for Outline Plan Approval Performance Standard Option ZONING
R I 5P
LOCATION
247 OTIS STREET
FEB 1 6 2006
ASHLAND OREGON LEGAL DESCRIPTION
39
IE
04BC
TL 400
APPLICANT
SAGE DEVELOPMENT LCC 2305 Ashland St Ste C446 Ashland OR 97520
APPLICATION FOR OUTLINE PLAN
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE
18 20 00
SUBDIVISION
18 80 00
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
18 88 00
EXCEPTION TO STREET STANDARDS
18 88 050
SOLAR ACCESS
18 70
TREE ORDINANCE
18 61080
OWNER SAGE DEVELOPMENT LCe
ENGINEER
2305 Ashland St
JAMES PEARSON
Ste C446 Ashland
1236 DISK DRIVE Ste 1
Oregon
97520
MEDFORD OR 97501
541 488 4114
SURVEYOR
POLARIS LAND SURVEYING
541 857 0864
ARBORIST
UPPER LIMB IT
SHA WN KAMPMANN
TOM MEYERS
P O BOX 459
P O BOX 881
ASHLAND OR 97520
ASHLAND OR 97520
541 482 5009
541482 3667
PLANNER AGENT
THORNTON ENGINEERING
WETLANDS N W
BIOLOGICAL
KENCAIRN SAGER LAND ARCH
SCOTT ENGLISH
KERRY KENCAIRN
P O BOX 671
545 A STREET
ASHLAND OR 97520
ASHLAND OR 97520
541488 1061
541 488 3194
J
FEB 1 6 2006
PROJECT DESCRIPTION lots and 2
large open space areas that incorporate the properties wetlands and existing large trees The project is being applied for in two phases phase I and phase II The property contains two existing buildings a swimming pool and a house these buildings and there associated land compromise phase II of the project Phase II and its associated 4 lots are shown as part of this application to represent how this land will ultimately be absorbed in to the project The project is accessed by a new public street that aligns with the existing Drager Street and an alley that allows rear access for 10 of the lots 2 through 11 and acts as a separation for proper solar relationships between these lots The intention of this project is to develop energy efficient cottage style homes The large open space areas dominate the site and provide large natural settings for both the residence of this development and the neighbors There is a pedestrian connection thought the site that allow for complete linear access to the wetland The preservation of these large natural areas makes the performance standards option ideal so that we can in essence transfer density from these open area by making the lots smaller and increasing the density through conservation housing The preservation of the wetland and the maintenance of the Tree area park will be written in to the Covenants of this project This
proposal
is for
a
residential subdivision that includes 22
building
association will be formed to manage the maintenance of these two areas In addition to standard conservation housing methodology we are also exploring the opportunity of using the existing warm spring well to provide radiant floor heating to the new homes This project will be privately a
home
owners
by Sage Development LLC sand Aili Eggert deceased The development final plan within one year financed and built
18 20 R 1
The current
owners
schedule of this
of the
project
property
Single Family Residential District
18 20 020 Permitted Uses The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted outright A Single family dwelling utilizing at least two of the following design features to
along
Sylvia Chambers approval of the
are
will follow the
provide visual relief
the front of the residence
This is
an
through
application
the
use
for outline
of various
18 20 030 Conditional
plan
design
the
proposed houses will meet
elements that define
single family
the
design
standards for the
residential detached
zone
dwelling
units
uses
proposal is exclusively for single family homes There are pre existing non conforming buildings this property they lie within the boundaries of Phase II of this proposal When the properties are developed the non conforming uses and layout will be resolved This
18 20 040 General A Minimum lot
on
regulations
area
projects are applied for under the performance standard option Where possible especially perimeter properties on the site the standards have been met to better wed the new development into the existing pattern of lots and homes The
Minimum lot
areas
and dimensions
are
waived when
around the
J
yard requirements
standard
of the
zone are
still
being
met front
have 6 foot setbacks garages have 20 setbacks and all back first floor and 20 to the second D Standard Yard The standard
yards have 15 foot setbacks side yards yards have a minimum 10 setback to the
Requirements
yard requirements
of the
zone are
still
being
met front
yards
have 15 foot setbacks side
yards have 6 foot setbacks garages have 20 setbacks and all back yards have the first floor and 20 to the second
a
Building Height No structure shall be over thirty five 35 feet or height whichever is less Structures within the Historic District shall
minimum 10 setback to
E Maximum
two and
stories in
not exceed
one a
half 2 1 2
height of
30 feet
proposed project is not within an historic district The proposed buildings height and floor limitations associated with the R I 5 zone
The
F Maximum
five
45
Maximum lot coverage shall be in an R 1 7 5 District and forty 40
Coverage
percent
fifty
50
percent
percent in
an
shall not exceed the
in
an
R 1 5 District
forty
R 1 10 District
performance standard application there is some transference of lot coverage from individual lots to larger community open spaces In the most restricted lots on the site the average lot coverage identified This variation from the zones 50 by the established building envelope and the driveway is 54 maximum is balanced by the projects extensive dedicated open space See performance standards option findings As
a
G Maximum Permitted Floor Area for This H
N
project w
dwellings
is not within the historic district
single family
structures and additions to
Dlstnct This
project
existing single family
F
Purpose
Options
the
fe stru1
is not within the historic district
18 88 Performance Standards 18 88 010
within the Historic District
J
1 6
Historic
J06
CIty of Ashland Community OevelOpmert
and Intent
The purpose and intent of this Chapter is to allow an option for more flexible design than is permissible under the conventional zoning codes The design should stress energy efficiency architectural creativity and innovation use the natural features of the landscape to their greatest
advantage provide a quality of life equal to or greater than that provided in developments built under the standard zoning codes be aesthetically pleasing provide for more efficient land use and reduce Ord 2228 1982 Ord the impact of development on the natural environment and neighborhood 2276 S2
1983 Ord
2356 1985
project is applying under the performance standards option to allow for greater site development efficiency while protecting the major natural features of the site the large stand of trees at the Northeast Within the site is a corner and the large spring fed wetland area on the eastern boundary of the site to warm spring well a portion of the flow has been used fill the existing swimming pool there is a great opportunity to use the spring to provide alternative radiant heating as many of the homes as possible all of the project homes will meet or exceed the State and city Earth Advantage program In this way this This
is
directly in line with the goals of the Performance Standards Option as a way development with greater site sensitivity and greater energy efficiency integration
project
18 88 030 Procedure for
to allow for
a
Approval
A Outline Plan 1
approval under this Chapter shall be accompanied by a proposed Outline Plan For developments of less than 10 lots the Outline Plan may be filed concurrently with the final Plan as that term is defined in 18 88 030 4 For developments of 10 lots or more prior 8 Plan is Outline approval mandatory Ord 2630 S6 1991 Application
This
proposal
2 A
Type
II
A
is for
a
two
procedure
3 Contents a
for subdivision
phase 22 lots
as
an
topographic map showing plan set
This is an
application
for outline
defined in this Ordinance shall be used for the
The contents for
Sheet SV 1 of the
subdivision
is
a
outline
plan
shall be
as
contour intervals of five
topographic map
plan only
approval of the outline plan
follows
5
feet
with 1 foot contour intervals
proposed land uses and approximate locations of the existing buildings to be retained the proposed structures on the site the proposed and existing property lines and easements on the site and existing buildings structures and trees greater than six 6 inches in diameter measured at breast height on the properties adjacent to the site and all buildings within one hundred sixty 160 b The
feet of the site boundaries Sheet S 1 of the are
existing building on the site that are two remain they buildings are also identified on Sheet SV 1 the these trees are also Sheet S 1 identifies all the trees on the site larger than 6 which is a tree inventory for the site All buildings adjacent to the site are shown on
plan set
contained within the
topographic shown
on
survey Sheet T 1
shows the locations of the area
identified
as
Phase II the
Sheet SV 1
c
The locations of all
proposed thoroughfares walkways
and
facilities
parking
public street that is an extension of Draeger Street from the South to the North The proposed project creates a through street from Otis Street to Randy Street This project proposes a public alley that allows for rear vehicle access to 10 lots all other lots are accessed off existing street or the new street extension There are sidewalks proposed throughout the site See Sheet P l for the on street parking layout of the project there are conservatively 63 on street parking places excluding street frontage that lies within Phase II All lots have at least one on street parking place and all lots will have Sheet S 1 identifies
a
d
two
car
Public
a new
garage
uses
including
schools
parks playgrounds open
spaces and trails
proposed project contains two large open spaces one at the North West side of the lot contains a large existing wetland with a pedestrian pathway running along its edge from Randy to Otis Streets At the North East corner of the property there are a large grouping of existing mature trees this area has been designated as public open space RECENED The
e
Public
or
private
utilities r
r
vI
r
U
16
LVO b
CIty of Ashland
Community Developmert
RECEIVED Existing
and
proposed utilities are
identified
on
Sheet C l of the
plan
set r
1 6
n LJ
f General This is
a
areas
wetland and the
CIty of Ashland Community Developme
of cuts and fill flat site
predominantly
existing
trees
we
on
will be
trees
The
wetland
existing
corner are
the
shown
on
working
with the natural
as
rock
outcroppings
help prese3rve
the
marshes wooded
areas
and isolated
the North West side of the site and the large grouping of trees in the North East all plans submitted These elements are also being proposed for protection within
plan
There
are no
water
courses on
i On lots which the outline
access
The
maximum
plan protection
where
are
required
building envelopes
height of the
zone
and solar set back
example
structures
are
included with this
k A written statement which will contain
project description
is included in the
an
all
buildings
will be under the
beginning
should be to scale and should include the all attached exterior hardware for heating
application of
explanation
of this document it is elaborated
proposed development and the Performance Standards Concept
i The character of the the
requirements
which is 35 feet
j Elevation of typical proposed structures The elevation approximate dimensions of the proposed structures and and cooling
advantage of
flooding
to contain detached single family dwellings building envelopes shall be included which show the area and maximum height of improvements including solar
1 includes
Elevations of
to
are
and view
plan S
subject
areas
subject to flooding There are a few irrigation ditches on Survey Sheet SV 1 As part ofthe proposal these ditches would
the site that
the site that have been identified on the be decommissioned and re contoured
A
to
on
h The location and direction of all watercourses and
on
grades
t
the site
g The location of natural features such
preservable
LL
manner
on
in which it has been
here
designed
to take
phased 22 lot detached single family residential subdivision The project of the large amount of land being designated as proposes the performance standard option because will protected for the existing wetland and the area of mature trees to be preserved The proposed homes is to enhance the surrounding be in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood ultimately the goal The an amenity with public access the wetland and by making neighborhoods by crating connectivity This
proposal
wetland ii The This
area
is for
2
will be enhanced with
proposed
project
a
manner
will be
of
vegetation
The
proposed streets
financing
developed
with
private financing j j
are
tree lined
RECEiVED
1 6 2006
FEB
iii The
The as
present ownership
present
owner
Aili Eggert
of the
though
iv The method
of all the land included within the
property
Ms
Eggert
proposed
is
Sylvia
Chambers
City of Ashland Community Development
development
Currently Jackson County
shows
a
second
owner
is deceased
to maintain
common
open
areas
buildings
and
private thoroughfares
employed and the method of maintenance for the public areas will be The wetland will require a state approved monitoring and maintenance plan that
A homeowners association will be defined in the CCR
s
minimum of 3 years this plan will lay out the future maintenance requirements of the wetland which will again be written into the CCR s and be the responsibility of the home owners
will be in
place
a
association
v
The
proposed
time schedule of the
The schedule for this project is
development
dependant
on
planning approvals
with the
City of Ashland
Final
plan
Part of the final plan process will be to
approved plan developed immediately acquire approval for the treatment of the wetland by the Division of State Lands and the Army corps of Engineers it is anticipated that this approval will take 6 to 12 months from the date of this Outline plan submittal The developer would like to begin as soon as those approvals are secured will be
vi The
after outline
findings of
the
is
applicant showing that the development Comprehensive Plan
meets the criteria set forth in this
Ordinance and the Ashland
project complies with the comprehensive plan
This set of findings describes how this and therefore that it 4 The
complies with
Planning Commission
shall approve the outline
the
City
plan when
of Ashland
it finds the
development
following
ordinance
criteria have
been met a
That the
This
development
project findings
meets all
meets all
applicable
applicable
ordinance
ordinance
requirements
requirements of of the
City
the
City
of Ashland
as
of Ashland described in these
Specifically
adequate key City facilities can be provided including water sewer paved access to and and adequate through the development electricity urban storm drainage police and fire protection transportation and that the development will not cause a City facility to operate beyond capacity b That
Preliminary utility plan provided by Thornton engineering demonstrates that key City facilities area available and adjacent to the site this development is an island of open land within an already developed residential neighborhood all sewer and other utility requirements are easily accessible and adjacent to The site is surrounded on two sides by existing paved roadways the project incorporates this property A transportation an additional road bisecting the site which completes the existing grid of the area analysis has been submitted with this application for more detailed information on the adequacy of the existing and proposed transportation The
existing and natural features of the land such as wetlands floodplain corridors ponds large trees rock outcroppings etc have been identified in the plan of the development and significant features have been included in the open space common areas and unbuildable areas That the
c
The site contains
an
features have been set aside been identified
as
future
large stand of mature trees Both these existing natural developable areas within the proposal These tow areas have also
wetland and
existing
as non
common
open space
development of the land the Comprehensive Plan
d That the shown in
There is
no
adjacent
a
will not
land that has not
prevent adjacent
already
land from
being developed
for the
been developed
adequate provisions for the maintenance of open space and common areas required or provided and that if developments are done in phases that the early phases have same or higher ratio of amenities as proposed in the entire project That there
e
are
proposed development will require well as the pedestrian way in perpetuity
This
responsibility for the enhancement
if the
homeowners association to maintain the open space areas Prior to build out and ultimate sale of the properties the
a
maintenance will fall to the
project owner and developer
The wetland
proposal requires a maintenance plan with regular reporting Army corps of Engineers All of the proposed open
area
as
as
part of
of the wetland health to
the State of Oregon and the the
uses
space is in Phase One of
project
f That the
proposed density
meets the base and bonus
density
standards established under this
RECEIVED
Chapter The base
g The
density
and bonus
density
development complies
are
below in section 18 88 040 A 1 and B
with the Street Standards
1 6
Ord 2836 S2 1999 City of Ashland ent
with the street standards
This
where the sidew
development as proposed complies except altered to save existing mature trees At these locations the sidewalk moves to a behind Please see section 18 88 050 F of these findings for further information on this issue B
HiP ft tW
the curb location
Final Plan
This
application
is for Outline Plan
only
Final
plan will
18 88 040 Performance Standards for Residential
be under
a
separate
submittal
Developments
A Base Densities
density of the development shall not exceed the density established by this Section The density shall be computed by dividing the total number of dwelling units by the acreage of the project including land dedicated to the public Fractional portions of the final answer after bonus point calculations shall not apply towards the total density 1
The
Base is
density for this zoning 19 53 dwelling units
district is R I 5
4 50 dulacre
c
The Allowable Base
Density
for this property
density of 10 units or greater shall be required to provide a minimum of 5 of the total lot area in Open Space that is not subject to bonus point calculations Bonus shall be awarded only to that Open Space area in excess of the 5 required for developments of 10 units for all of less than 10 units or greater Open Space shall be optional developments
2
All
5
developments
of the total lot
park
rows
with
base
a
is 9 460
area
our
is 38 228 square feet 400
proposed open space for of the required area
the
project excluding
streets
sidewalks and
Bonus Point Calculations
B
RECEIVED Complete lot is 4 34 Acres 189 216
Zoning
feet
1 0
R I 5
Allowable
density outright 4
19 53 units is
our
Conservation
7
sQuare
base
acre
4 34
x
4 5
City of Ashland Community Development
19 53 units
density add 15
Housing
open space
5 units per
6
required
for
2 92 units
project
over ten
our new
density is
base
22 45
units
additional open space While we are increase in density per 1 Additional open space allows for 1 as over on our 300 part of our calculations open space requirement we area not using the open space because we have met our needs with the conservation housing requirement
This
application
is for 22 units
Calculations with the pool
area
and existin2 house removed with the
area
of the future lots associated
with them removed PHASE 1
Zoning
R I 5 of house and
Acreage
Remaining Acreage Allowable
pool
1
are
The
applying for permitted
no case
This
shall the
acres
32 055 square feet
4 5 units per
acre
3 6
acres x
4 5
16 2 units
density
Conservation Housing We
0 736
3 6 157 161 square feet
density outright
16 2 units at base
with identified lots 16 17 18 19
add 15
43 2
units
our new
18 units within the PHASE 1
density shall be increased by density exceed that allowed under with the
density
is 18 63
area
base
proposal complies
base
the
percentage gained through
the
Comprehensive
comprehensive plan r
Plan
bonus
points
In
RECElVED 2 The maximum bonus
We
area
3 The
permitted
applying for a 15
following
shall be 60
Ord
2669 1992 r
t v
density
increase CIty
of Ashland
Community Development
bonuses shall be awarded
Housing all home or residential units on the site meet the energy usage water quality requirements adopted in the Guidelines referred to in 18 88 090 maximum
Conservation
a
usage and air bonus
15
We b
are
applying for
Provision of
Though we
common
exceed the
application because c
Provision of
We
are
We
are
housing
bonus
open space
required
we
already
we are not using this as part of our dedicated open space by 300 we meet the density require using the Conservation Housing opportunity
major recreational facilities
not including
d Affordable
conservation
the 15
a
major
recreational
facility component
within our
application
for
density
bonus
density
bonus
Housing
not including the affordable
housing component
part
as
of our
application for
a
18 88 050 Street Standards defined in 18 88 020 development under this Chapter shall conform to the Street Standards as The following standards regulate the development of streets and are in addition to the standards All
K
contained in the Street Standards Handbook
private ownership not dedicated to the public which serves three or less units No curbs or sidewalks are required for a private drive On street parking prohibited on private drives The private drive standard is as follows A Private Drive A
private
drive is
a
road in
is
3 Units15 feet with 20 feet dedicated width 2 Units15 feet with 20 feet dedicated width 1 Unit12 feet with 15 feet dedicated width Lots 14 and 15
are on one
private
drive
The dedicated width of the
driveway
shall be 20 feet the
paved
width of the drive shall be 15 feet B Dedicated Public Streets R 1
RR and WR
zone
Required
All roads which
must be dedicated to the
serve
public
four units
and shall be
or
greater
developed
and which
to the
are
in
an
Street
Standards of this section This
proposal
includes
a new
dedicated
25 feet wide curb to curb with
parking
public on
street and
both sides the
dedicated
a
alley is 16 feet wide
C Dead End No dead end road shall exceed 500 feet in end roads must terminate in
an
guidelines adopted pursuant to
improved
turnaround
public alley
as
length
not
and
The dedicated street is
paved
including the turnaround Dead
defined in the Performance Standards
Section 18 88 090
I
RECEiVED There
dead ends
are no
proposed
D Obstructed Streets There E
are no
Creating
Street
as
part of this application
an
obstructed street is
obstructed streets within this
Street Grade Street
shall be
as
grades
G
prohibited City of Ashland Community Development
project application
measured at the street centerline for dedicated streets and
flag
follows have been met
grade requirements
see
C l preliminary
grading and utility plan
Exception to Street Standards An exception to the Street Standards is not subject to the requirements of section 18 100 and may be granted with respect to the Street Standards in if all of the following circumstances are found to exist F
There
are a
total of six mature trees
on
Variance 18 88 050
require deviation from the normal sidewalk parkrow maintaining pedestrian access through out the of the neighborhood and should be protected to help maintain the
the site that
to allow for the future health of the tree while
relationship site
drives
These trees
are
old time residence
current character
A There is demonstrable
unique The
or
unusual aspect
existing
are
existing
current street standards
path
streets
meeting the specific requirements proposed use of the site
so
chapter
due to
a
The streets where these tree
alignment
help bring the alignment into protection in compliance with the current
the street could not be relocated to are
being suggested
for
of Ashland Tree Ordinance 18 61 00
equal or superior transportation
facilities and
connectivity
exception will allow for continued pedestrian access throughout the site while providing conservation and protection It will provide for equal transportation facilities and connectivity
Approval
of this
C The variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the The
of this
or
of the standard sidewalk
These trees
B The variance will result in
tree
in
of the site
trees fall in the
conflicts exist
City
difficulty
proposed deviation
the sidewalk
returns tot
difficulty
alignment is the minimum necessary alignment as quickly as possible
from the desired sidewalk eh standard
and
D The variance is consistent with the stated
Purpose
to
get around the
trees
and Intent of the Performance Standards
Options Chapter Ord 2836 Amended 02 02 1999 18 88 060
Parking
Parking Standards
standards shall be
A Off Street
Parking
as
follows
Off street
parking
shall be
as
provided
in
Chapter
18 92 of the Ashland Land Use
Ordinance a two car garage All lots excluding lots 15 and 16 have at least a 50 foot the smaller lots have rear loaded garages so there are no curb cuts in the street to
Each homesite will include street
frontage
All
pf
1
interfere with 18 in
phase
parking
1 and 4 in
There is at least
phase
2
and
a
one on street parking place per lot There are 22 lots proposed conservative count shows at minimum 63 parking places
B On Street
Parking Required At least one on street parking space per unit shall be provided in parking requirements for all developments in an R 1 zone and all in R 2 and R 3 zones that create or improve public streets On street parking spaces developments shall be immediately adjacent to the public right of way on publicly or association owned land and be directly accessible from public right of way streets On street parking spaces shall be located within 200 feet of the dwelling which it is intended to serve Ord 2484 S5 1988 addition to the off street
Each homesite will include
a two car garage All lots excluding lots 15 and 16 have at least a 50 foot the smaller lots have rear loaded garages so there are no curb cuts in the street to
All
frontage pf parking There is at least one on street parking place per lot There are 22 lots proposed 18 in phase 1 and 4 in phase 2 and a conservative count shows at minimum 63 parking places
street
interfere with
C On Street
Parking Standards On
public parking may be provided by either the minimum guidelines under Section 18 88 090 or parallel to urb side C rb side stal ls shall be eight feet in width and 24 feet in length and shall not be Qermitted RECEIVED In front of dnveways or fire hydrants street
criteria established in the Performance Standards
All
on
street
parking
are
parallel
18 88 070 Setbacks A Front
yard
setbacks shall follow the
requirements
Front Yard setbacks within this submittal B
Setbacks
parent
along the perimeter
of the
are
throughout the project are
C Maximum
heights
The maximum
15 for the front of the home and 20 for garages
development shall
height
shall be the
as
same as
of the homes shall be
D One half of the minimum width
building height at the between buildings
Our maximum average roof height for side yards Therefore all buildings are E Solar Access Setback Solar
We have
provided setbacks
property line
This
assures
typical
and
required
have the
as
required
in the
required
same
R I 5
parent
setbacks
as
required
in the
zone
adjacent building shall
a
two story home would be 24
a
minimum of 12 apart
access
shall be
provided
where
zoning
in R I 5 35
wall closest to the
as
or
we
required
be
required
as
have included 6 setback
half the average
appropriate that limit the roof height compliance with the solar standard A for all
Any single family structure not shown on the plan building envelope on the outline plan
in the
underlying
City of Ashland Community Development
district
zone
The setbacks
F
of the
the
on
all
height
in Section 18 68
to 14 feet at
twenty feet from the
lots
must meet the setback
requirements
established
lU Li
All
single family
structure
building envelopes
and
existing
structures
are on
the
Overlay Zone
18 88 080 P
plan
1 6
J O
i
property topography vegetation
or
natural hazards
are more
suitable for
development
under
Performance Standards
project property B All
is within the P
developments
Overlay
other than
zone
because of the wetland that takes up
partitionings which involve
a
large portion
the division of land
or
of the
development of
individual living units in the P overlay areas shall be processed under this Chapter of the Land Use Ordinance The minimum number of dwelling units for a Performance Standards Subdivision shall be three This
project
18 88 100
is
proposing
Applicability
22 lots divided into two
phases
Phase I is 18 lots and Phase II is 4 lots
of Other Sections of the land Use
Development Ordinance
This
proposal meets all of the land use code sections accept for lot requirements have been met for the zone without modification
size
depth
and width
All setback
18 70 Solar Access
18 70 030 lot Classifications This lot has
a
South to North
slope
of 2
to 4
We
are
using Formula
1 for
our
solar setback
classification We
are
applying
solar standard A to all lots within this
See the Lot Classification Standards The setbacks identified feet
This
brings problem meeting
image
proposal
at the bottom of the page
plan show affecting lots to have a 20 foot setback for a height of 14 compliance of standard A The other lots in the subdivision will have no setback requirements as most lots shadow the street on their north property
on our
Site
those lots into the solar
line 18 61 Tree Ordinance 18 61 050 Plans
Required
application includes a sheet T l that identifies all the tree on the site and the trees within feet on neighboring properties It includes all information on tree health size etc
This 15
This tree information is also included in narrative form at the end of this section A
An
plan
of the
V
0
City of Ashland Community Development which have been largely
A The purpose of the P overlay zone is to distinguish between those areas developed under the subdivision code and those areas which due to the undeveloped nature of the
This
11 1
application for all Tree Removal and Tree Topping Permits shall be made upon forms prescribed by the City The application for a Tree Removal Permits shall contain The number size species and location of the trees proposed to be removed or topped on a property
L
i
a
site
There
are
5 trees
removal is
proposed
a street
be removed within
a
Tree
3 is
Tree
14 is
tree and
for removal within Phase a
tree removal
The other four trees
requested
proposed building envelope on Specifically an
existing
requested
street tree
on
one
of this
for removal
are
On of the trees
project
permit is submitted with this
proposed
for
request this tree
application proposed roadway to
either within the
or
the site
Otis Street and will fall within the
to be removed because of site
layout
alignment proposed building envelope
new
and how the
street
relates to the tree Tree
15 falls within the
proposed road alignment this alignment is made necessary in creating connectivity with existing streets adjacent to the project Tree 11 and 12 are small Pears of questionable value and fall within a desired building envelope b The
The
anticipated date of
anticipated
removal
or
topping
date of removal is pre mature
we
will be able to
identify the
date of removal with final
plan approval c
A statement of the
Tree
3 is
existing 14 is requested
Tree
an
reason
for removal
street tree
on
or
topping
Otis Street and will fall within the
to be removed because of site
layout and
alignment proposed building envelope
new
how the
street
relates to the tree Tree
15 falls within the
connectivity Tree d
proposed road alignment this alignment is made necessary in creating existing streets adjacent to the project 12 are small Pears of questionable value and fall within a desired building envelope
with
11 and
Information
concerning proposed landscaping
planting
or
of
new
trees to
replace
the trees to be
removed and
The
applicant
is
anticipating
there will also be
happy
to
numerous
provide three
of the two open space e
for
the
one
areas
Evidence that the trees
property for visual
planting of at least 72 street trees as part of Phase one of this project planted as part of the proposed wetland enhancement We would be on site mitigation of the trees proposed for removal as part of the design
trees
proposed
B
Any other
or
topped
have been
clearly identified
on
thERECEIVED
inspection
The trees to be removed have been f
for removal
information
tagged by
the arborist with their associated number
reasonably required by
the
City
Ashianc i City of Community Deveiopmen with the criteria for
The
applicant shall have the burden of proving that the application complies approval of the applicable class of permit If the application is for a Tree Removal Staff Permit applicant shall submit specific written findings and evidence addressing the criteria in section 18 61 080 for issuance of
a
the
Tree Removal Staff Permit
C
Misrepresentation of any fact necessary for the City s determination for granting a tree removal permit shall invalidate the permit The City may at any time including after a removal has occurred independently verify facts related to a tree removal request and if found to be false or misleading may invalidate the permit and process the removal as a violation Such misrepresentation may relate I
to matters
including without limitation tree size location permit or owner s authorized signature
health
or
hazard condition
justification
for
issuance of
Specifications
for Demolition and Site
1 The demolition contractor is all work procedures
access
2 The limits of all tree 3 Tree a
Any
and haul routes and
protection
zones
a manner
brush
that
not
by
demolition
causes no
clearing required
damage
tree
protection
prior
to
beginning
work
review
to
measures
shall be staked in the field
be removed that have branches
arborist and
qualified
tree in
4
to
s
Clearing to meet with the consultant at the site
required
to
within the
or
into the canopy of tree s to remain must be removed by construction contractors The qualified arborist shall remove the
extending
the tree
and under story to remain protection zone shall be accomplished with hand
tree s
operated
equipment 5 Trees
to
be removed shall be felled
breaking of roots
of trees
to
so as
fall way from tree protection zones and to avoid pulling and are entwined the consultant may require first severing the major
to
remain If roots
extracting the trees This may be accomplished by cutting through the roots by hand with a vibrating trencher with sharp blades or other approved root pruning equipment
knife rock
6 Trees
a
woody root
before
mass
be removed from within the tree
to
shall be cut
protection
zone
ground level and the stump ground out 7 All downed brush and trees shall be removed from the
shall be removed
by
saw
narrow
qualified arborist The
trees
near
sitting
outside the
across
the
tree
protection
zone
Extraction shall
tree
occur
protection zone either by hand or with equipment by lifting the material out not by skidding it
ground
8 Brush shall be
chipped and placed in the tree protection zone to a depth of 6 inches underground features to be removed within the tree protection zone shall use the smallest equipment possible and operate from outside the tree protection zone The consultant shall be on site during all operations within the tree protection zone to monitor demolition activity 10 All trees shall be pruned in accordance with the provided Pruning Specifications 11 A six foot chain link fence with posts sunk into the ground shall be erected to enclose the tree protection 9 Structures and
zone
12 so
Any damage
to trees
that remedial action
due
can
to
demolition activities shall be
be taken
Timeliness is critical to
reported to tree
the
consulting
arborist within six hours
health
13 If temporary haul or access roads must pass over the root area of trees to be retained a roadbed of 6 inches of mulch or gravel shall be created to protect the soil The roadbed material shall be replenished as necessary to maintain
a
6 inch
depth
Specifications for Tree Preservation During Construction 1 Before beginning work the contractor is required to meet with the consultant at the site to review all work procedures access routes storage areas and tree protection measures 2 Fences must be erected to protect trees to be preserved Fences define a specific protection zone for each tree or group of trees Fences are to remain until all site work has been completed Fences may not be relocated or removed without the written permission of the consultant 3 Construction trailers and traffic and storage areas must remain outside fenced areas at all times 4 All underground utilities and drain or irrigation lines shall be routed outside the tree protection 5 No materials
protection area they shall be tunneled or bored under the tree equipment spoil or waste or washout water may be deposited
protection
fenced
must traverse
and not
by
If lines
the
zone
6 Additional
zone
tree
p
stored
or
parked
within the tree
area
ning required personnel
for clearance
during construction
must
be
perfor
J
constructIOn
City of
Yflified f
Ashland
arborist
7
Any herbicides placed under paving materials must be safe for use around trees and labeled for that use Any pesticides used on site must be tree safe and not easily transported by water 8 If injury should occur to any tree during construction the tree consultant should evaluate it as soon as possible so that appropriate treatments can be applied 9 The
consulting
arborist
monitor any
must
grading
construction demolition
or
other work that may
encounter tree roots
10 All trees shall be within the tree
irrigated on
protection
11 Erosion control devices to
a
schedule to be determined
prevent siltation andor erosion within the
12 Before
by
the consultant
Irrigation
shall wet the soil
to a
depth of 30 inches such as silt fencing debris basins
zone
grading pad preparation
or
tree
protection
and water diversion structures shall be installed
zone
excavation for foundations
footings walls or trenching any trees specific shall be root pruned 1 foot outside the tree protection zone by cutting all roots cleanly to a depth of 24 inches Roots shall be cut by manually digging a trench and cutting exposed roots with a saw vibrating knife rock saw narrow trencher with sharp blades or other approved root pruning equipment 13 Any roots damaged during grading or construction shall be exposed to sound tissue and cut cleanly with a within the
construction
zone
saw
14 If temporary haul of mulch
or
maintain
a
15
Spoil
gravel
6 inch
or access roads must pass over the root area of trees to be retained a road bed of 6 inches shall be created to protect the soil The road bed material shall be replenished as necessary to
depth
from trenches basements
any reason or duration 16 No burn piles or debris be
dumped
or
17 Maintain fire safe allowed
near
pits
buried within the
mulch
Specifications
areas
or
or
other excavations shall
shall be tree
placed protection
around fenced
Clear the
for Tree
crown
be
placed
protection
within the tree
zone
protection
No ashes debris
or
for
zone
garbage
may
zone
areas
Also
no
heat
sources
flames
ignition
EfQfflng is
sour
trees
Pruning
1 All trees within the a
within the tree
not
project area shall of diseased crossing
be
pruned
to
weak and dead wood to a minimum size of do
Citv of Ashiand l
bes lopmerj
diameter b
Provide 14 feet of vertical clearance
c
Remove stubs
over streets and 8 feet over sidewalks outside the woundwood tissue that has formed around the branch cutting d Reduce end weight on heavy horizontal branches by selectively removing small diameter branches greater than 2 to 3 inches near the ends of the scaffolds e Remove any mistletoe
2 Where clearance 3
temporary
clearance is needed for
access
no
branches shall be tied back to hold them out of the
zone
Pruning
shall not be
performed during periods of flight of adult boring insects because fresh wounds shall be performed only when the danger of infestation is past pests Pruning 4 All pruning shall be performed by a qualified arborist attract
5 All
pruning shall be in accordance with the Tree Pruning Guidelines International Society of Arboriculture and or the ANSI A300 Pruning Standard American National Standard for Tree Care Operations and adhere to the most recent edition of ANSI Z133 1 6 Interior branches shall not be 7 8
cuts
stripped
Pruning larger Pruning cuts that expose heartwood
9 No
more
out
than 4 inches in diameter
than 20 percent of live
except for
dead wood shall be avoided
shall be avoided whenever
foliage
possible
shall be removed within the trees
t
10 While in the tree the arborist shall perform an aerial inspection to identify defects that require treatment Any additional work needed shall be reported to the consultant 11 Brush shall be chipped and chips shall be spread underneath trees within the tree protection zone to maximum depth of six inches the trunk clear of mulch
leaving
Species
DBH
Height
Crown Protection
Construction
Radius Zone
Tolerance
Condition
Action
1 Acer saccharinum
61
58
30
40
moderate
good
Preserve
2
9
22
6
7
moderate
fair
preserve
17
45
21
17
poor
fair
REMOVE
43
52
30
40
poor
good
Preserve
47
48
22
30
moderate
poor
Preserve
6 Morus alba
38
48
22
30
moderate
fair
Preserve
7
Juglans
hindsii
25
45
25
25
poor
fair
Preserve
8
Juglans
hindsii
29
55
19
29
poor
fair
Preserve
9
Juglans
hindsii
21
40
15
21
poor
fair
Preserve
29
45
15
29
poor
fair
Preserve
11 Pyrus communis
13
15
9
10
moderate
fair
REMOVE
12
6
15
7
5
moderate
poor
REMOVE
13 Acer saccharinum
36
47
30
36
moderate
good
Preserve
14
20
41
12
15
poor
good
REMOVE
22
30
24
22
moderate
good
REMOVE
Catalpa speciosa
3
Juglans
4
Cupressus
5 Salix
10
hindsii
macrocarpa
babylonica
Juglans hindsii
Pyrus
communis
Cupressus
15 Salix
arizonica
babylonica
16
Catalpa speciosa
8
23
9
8
moderate
good
Preserve
17
Catalpa speciosa
6
23
7
6
moderate
good
Preserve
18
Catalpa speciosa
9
25
9
9
moderate
good
REMOVE
19
Juglans
10
25
7
10
poor
good
REMOVE
20 Acer saccharinum
30
47
20
30
moderate
good
Preserve
21 Fraxinus latifolia
11
28
12
11
moderate
good
Preserve
22 Acer saccharinum
38
47
30
38
moderate
good
Preserve
23 Acer saccharinum
31
47
18
31
moderate
good
Preserve
24 Acer saccharinum
30
42
15
30
moderate
goo
hindsii
t
ECEIVE reserve
f
City of Ashland Community Development
a
M
HABITAT RESTORATION
NORTHWEST BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
Cal
Engineering
Contractors Lic
599428
RCElVED
Memorandum
January
9 2006
City of Ashland Comm Jnity Development
To
Kerry Kencaim Kencaim Sager Landscape Architects 545 A Street Ashland
Oregon
97520
Scott English Wetland Consultant
From
Northwest
Biological Consulting
324 Terrace Street
Ashland
Subject
Oregon
97520
Preliminary Wetland Findings Regarding the Helman Springs Property at 247 Otis Street Tax lot 400 Ashland Oregon 97520
findings regarding the initial wetland delineation that was recently completed by a joint effort by Northwest Biological Consulting and K C Environmental Services Kerry The following
is
a
summary of our preliminary
Approximately 30 wetland study plots were installed at the Helman Springs Property to determine the location and extent of the wetlands Information on soils hydrology and vegetation was gathered from data plots according to required methods described in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual I
P O
Box 671
324 Terrace street
Ashland
Oregon
tI
97520
503 488 1061
Fax 503 488 6717
I
C
HABITAT RESTORATION
NORTHWEST BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
Cal
Engineering
Contractors Lic
599428
Wire
flags were placed in the field to outline the location and area of the preliminary wetlands delineation The Preliminary Wetlands boundary and area was surveyed and mapped by a licensed land surveyor The wetland area is approximately 0 60 acres in size and is associated with a natural spring that is located on the property The wetland type is Palustrine Emergent Seasonally Flooded PEMC A final wetland delineation will be completed this spring when the vegetation and hydrology can be described in more detail Wetland mitigation on site will be required for any potential impacts to wetlands from the development There appears to be enough land on the site with the right conditions to provide mitigation if necessary Fill and removal permits and compensatory wetland mitigation plans approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands and the Army Corps of Engineers would be required if there are impacts to jurisdictional wetlands
Please call if you have any
questions
Sincerely
Scott
English Wetlands Consultant
RECEIVED
JAN City
1
2005
of Ashland
Community Development
o
P O Box 671
324 Terrace street
Ashland
Oregon
97520
503 488 1061
Fax 503
488 6717
Proposed
Elevation
4 Bedroom
2
2 1 2 Bath
Den 2453 square feet
RECEIVED
City
cf Ash2r1d Devc opment CommUi
g
0
il
a
50
it
JS it i
g
0
g
tj
jSal
W
cl
ai
3 2
ili
d
8
3
ala
ar
ru
j
J lJ
j
s
Of
iil
2
O
tt
rn
j
1 l
tj l t
j sj
00
r
l
0
j CI
i c
PruQJ
1
b n
ca
ill
0q
1
53
m
ca
ACl
o
a
i t
g
A iii
0
8
C
S
@
So
ill
s
h fj
l
1J
5l
3 9
31t
Ci
tl
iil
lj
i
6
CJ
ill
l
r
1
i
it
ar
1 t
C
as
1 3S i
It
l i
0
g
Cl
l
t 0 0
ar
0
l
i
i C
JS
7J fit
j 5 ti
3
ct3
3
2
is
t
ft
S
1 l 3 l6 2
0
Cl
S
to
r
C it
ti
tn
l ai
01
f
e
1
CJ
r
3
g a
1
1
0
q
n
r
II z
T
DR
0
0
L
trI t
f
trl
J ti
U
fj
JE
f
g e
6
Y
I
I
R
T
Ashland Oregon
247 Otis Street
SAGE DEVELOPMENT LLC HELMAN SPRINGS SUBDIVISION
0
g
g
Q
r
s
R
l
L
N
L
I
0
R
T
li
Q
H
iD
I
I
I
1
I
L
II U
1 L
I
U9
fL l
L
9
A
J
TZABETH
J I
l @
E
V
l i
R
V
r
C
li
toO
2 A
j p
A
L
C
Cl
E
A
l i
Cl
S
FAX
PH
541
541
C
C
SUITE 3
JE
f
Hl
552 9512
488 3194
OREGON 97520
STREET
rT1
l
l i
I
SO
lii
T
VE
ASHLAND
545
t
j p
EN
LJ
A
r J
II
II
t
o
lii
ii Eh
J
0
6
14
1 HI 1
g
Vh
tS
Oi
I
@
Ashland
Oregon
247 Otis Street
HELMAN SPRINGS SUBDIVISION
SAGE DEVELOPMENT LLC
C
4 Jeql8s
L
9
i
C
Cl
sa
RE
of
Jnc
l rED
nt
Q
L
I
I
rJl bc u
L llrl
c lp
Sager ill
SUITE 3 OREGON 97520
TREET
552 9512
l488 3194
t
KenCairn
i
3
0
5
CD
CD
0
J
c
3 3
0
0
j
jg o
OUlUl
Z
Ul
f
1
jCJ O
1Z CJi
i1i 1
N
i
z v
0
0
0
c c en
I
en
CD
fTl
fT1 j
fT1
r
IJ
r03
r
Ul fTl
NJ
OUlZ
r
O
x
CJ
z
in 6
V
12
0
0
N
r
0
t
J
0
CJ
V
1
E
0
PJ
0
C
o
g
CJ
V
c
I
I
I
1
0
I
I
1
h
J
c
J c
c
J o
CJ
2iJfg
8
i OJ
e
l i
J
Cl
1 i
1J co
i3
ll
PJ
C
oJ
I
I
I
0
0
i
oJ Cl
1J
c
t
tiJ
C
oJ
G
r
I
I
I
1J
1J co
1
8 a
C
f
0
t
C
C C
co
i
JJ
i5
I
1
il
I
s
OJ
8
I
I
I
I
I
fi I
I
C
i
O
q
3
d
I i
I
i
I
i
I l t
I
I
If
i
i
II
I
II
I
If
I
II
r STREET
hil
Nla
o ill
QC
I
r
Oj
C C C C
e1212
oJ
PJ
l
I
1
p
V
l
I
I
I
DRAGER
0
0
CJ
V
Clol
i
C
Jco
C
r
ill t
C
J
1
i1
0 M
ll
PJ
C
oJ
G
EJCi
Q i
C
oJ
G
g
0
V
i
t
Q J i
oJ
l
C
oJ
illMr lJ
1
i
0
f1
ls
Q
1 i
g
12
Ci
g 0 1 i
12
oJ
g
i
0
m
0 m
m
0
M
r J1
i
1J co
G
G
I
I
I
r r r r
I
oJ
oJ
I
I
I
G
r
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
1 l
I
1
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
I I
I
u
i i
il
I
I
I
1
I
i
I j i
I
I
II 1
I
Ji1 L
I
r
L
I
j
t
1
I
or
ill
J
0
o
I l
t
0
o
L
I
I
o
o
L
1
0
o
o
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
i
I
I
II
1
I
i
I
I
JI I i I
I
I
1
J
l
I
I
r
I
I
0
II
j 111 1
i kl I
I
I
1
dY
Q
I
r
I
I
I
i
I
8
i3 O
1l
r
I
I
05
CJ
8
0
0
r
L
r
I
I
I
l
r
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
H
I
I
7
I
I
I
I
I
to
3
e
L
Dc
i
ljlC
s
p
0 1
h
g
i
r
5 fi
c
J 30
o
oa
S
m Q iJD
W
m
Q
3lb
gs
lb
2
n
I
a
J
I 16
Si
o@r
II
QQ
s
l
CQ
B
I O
i
c
a
mS
3
Q
3
Q
5
@
lU
g
l
6
1
lb
Q
O
2 a
a
i
o
s
8
a
ll gCD
aR
i s
l
l
Ii
1s
r
s
cs
gi3 oo
i
ai j f s
s
lb
s a
Q ttfl
g
j SSI
iS
r
0
a
a
I
l
i RQ 81
g
a g
Cl
5 g
QCi
i
I
Q
l j
tJ
i
lt
U ll
Q
ru
il
U
TI
2
rn
C
1J ill
O J tE
S
J
S
s
f
9
JO l
a a S s
@h
Q
sf
ga aa
a
l
CD
9
QI g
6
s
Q
8
iil
l
OJ
Ii
ii
J
l
j
S
o
l
l t
g
2
i i a 9
9
l
a
a1
g
gl ir
l Q
g
l
g
g 6
ag
l
lS
8s
W
B
a
I
r
s
o
o
J II
rtQ
Q
i
o
o
6 3
Q
i
lU
Q
ii
j
0 Q
g
l
a
6
Q
i
f
i
f a
0
i
lU
i
i
g
Q
S
CQ
J
g
B
16
s
S
ii S m
lU
8
@
l
i
to
i
il
ill
II
s
i
r
S
a
B
l
lg
N
Q13
g
s
Ii
Is lU
Q
lir
Si
Q
ti
6
5
ti
ioS
S
I tS
2
a
ar
lU
g
1
fA
ii
ij
i a
6i
i
16
ii
0
i
6
5
lU
i
a
M
iil
i
s S
Q
i
lU
i
i
I
i
f
i
l
l
l
g
2
i
I
a
g3
i
a
lU
88 3
i
I
o
nt o
a
Ci
Q
Q
j
t
c
o
3g
g
162
a
@Q
16
n
i
g
a
d
i
I16r
i
11
C
8
l
roa
0
0
OJ
iii
iii
55
it
iit
il
0
ill
0
IJ
it
ill
iil
HELMAN SPRINGS SUB DIVISION 247 Otis Street Ashland Oregon
c
lli
jj
J
1
0 a
Sf
Q
l
8
i
Q
0
5
11
ari
Q
i
il
llllll ll
l
l
3
a
liS
g
i
sa
cs
rg
iq
16
t t
iil
tJ
i
3
g
n
B
Q
lU
i
a
i
III lllll
it
i
l
a
i
r
i3
3
III
a
r
i
it
5
ctl
s
1l l
s
go
I
Oo
s
g
3i
i
161
a
to
l
lOQ
r
N
g
f
all
S
a8
IMI il
a
OB
l
Q
Iai
II fi
8
s
0
llr
oCP
i
5
s
I
1
n
n
lll
i
s
tl
r i l lri lli 111a i
ia
3 tIC
q6
Q
i
q
iill I lll til I ltii
ao
lf
i
gi
lb
ij
I
g
l
il
g
t
3JRi
g i
lU
I I
lUaontCj
J CD
s
a
a
g
lb
ii lii
S
Q
tl1iliil1
3
a
anq
liii II
i i IIg
9o
Q
@i
a
s s
gg
j 1
r
o
a
IRI rlir t i i i 1
I
i s liS16 lirll n3l lbi
i
iQ
i
i i
ii
tO
11 fli i lf til illi 1 l
3
JI
SAGE DEVELOPMENT LLC
J
a
CD
6
QQ
i
5iiil
a
9B
liiifi
i
S
ti a
QR
lU
g
iB a
s
Iliill II 16
t
3
aBi ig i l l I I ii 03 ma li 1 i 6 i iiiii I I iJ i a 5 3s
t 9lb
II
5
i
li li It 1 li Ii i
lb
Q
a
3
ae
II
is
st
il
OJ
@J
@J Ii
Q
5
il
tll
tll
Q
5
il
l
l
l
iii
t
J
g
is
iil
l
j
g
i
1
I
0
f
j
OJ
a
f
iil
J
OJ
1
o
t
1
5
9
l
I
ii
cr
I
g
iil
g
n
l
iil
Q
g
g
cri
0
s
g
il
if
oQ t
ii
o
f
f
L
I
I
1
I
I
L
I
r
I
I
l
J
I
I
r
j
J
r
1
L
IL
I
1
J
L
l
I
l
I
c
i
I
I
l
I
I
c
I
iL
1
I
TTl
J
1
3
I
A
i
s s
CD
Q
3g
ll
d
i
R
o
i
l
O
iQl d
lU
a
L inrI
1 1
c Ji
Sager
I
@
I
g
CD
S
4 itW
t
is
tJ
h
8i1
C
gD
J @
g
R
oa
3
s
@
i
FAX
PH
I
s
lU
A
tJ
l
il
0
S
19
J
3
S
QQ
a
Q
i
sm
o
541
541
2
J
g
5
l i
3
lU
aQ
lU
n
I
5
0
n
i c
i
fi g
g
552 9512
488 3194
0
CD
1 n
lU
lQ
Q Is
g l
g Q
9
3g g
ti
b
f
Jiif g
3
q
g8 i5
iCl bC
t1
o
rn
s
Q
ttigOJ
g
b
tJS QS iD s @
i
a3Q S
D
ft Q
sfi
s
ti
Q
5 C
i
2l
Q S s
g
2
CQ
0
i tiS o Q S iil
8 i
ha @g
0
rega
i
iiJ
rn
s
sOJg
n
5
b
tt
r
I
I
a Q 0
g s
I I
J
ttio s R l 1l
g
l
CDQ
gga
a
6
Q
dS
I
SUITE 3
d
r
IJ
OREGON 97520
J
I S
STREET
o
@
iR
nmw
l
ASHLAND
545
Q
s
s
5
i
r
16
o
Q
a
J
oQ
i
i
l g
CD
iil
lU
CD
i
fi
1
4
i8
i
g
s
lUO
Q
g
i
8
N
J
IIl
a
0
a
lU
s
g@
a
i
o
I
I
I II
I I
Jl
l
a
i
lB i a
s
i
Ja ia1l 1l
ri
Qs
r
KenCairn
g
lU
s ti
a
O
Ql
a
g
1 Arr llil
r
Q
g
3
b
g
1
S s
i
Q
m
1j
8
li a
CQ
sE2ia
a
i16Ci r
iQ
i
iil QQ re
i
lU
179
L
l I I I
iL
I
I
c
l
@ J
I
I
Ashland
Oregon
247 Otis Street
@
t
L
I
I
I
If
SAGE DEVELOPMENT LLC
L
I
I
Ce
l
ifii
J
I J
L r
HELMAN SPRINGS SUBDIVISION
II
II
I
r
Vi v
k
Jp
ECEIVED
18nt
li
Sager
Ken Cairn
lC
541 541
PH
SUITE 3
552 9512
488 3194
OREGON 97520
STREET
FAX
ASHLAND
545 A
i
5
cs
0
9
3 30
Z G
11 1
V c 0
6
V
tJ o
i
t i l tti
u
c x z
i
2
o
0
Jl
01
o
l
O
OZllI III 0
l
III
11 0
o
ClI
Ul
1
ID
OOl c 8
OlllO
2 11 0
III J
m
0
L
J
0
1 I
i
A a
r
It j
J
I
I
I tv
I L
I
I
7
I
I
I
TRE
D R
11
J If
I
I
I
h
i
i
I
Y
11
11J L
1
llr
I
I
f
i
l
NiJ E R
n
w
r
Il Itl
I
Ij j
0
1
I
I
I
r
f
JL
1
l
0
II
L
0 I
I
I LI
I
i
I
I
f
I
I
mi
I
I
i
I
i
n
I I
c
I
NO
I
II
II
iI1
r t
I
B
t
1
Y
I
I
I
r I
r
I
ttl
1
l 11
R
l
H
il
fd I
i
e
s
B
ij C U
I
1
I
l
1f
1
ii
ir
I
2
t
I
I L
r
i
I
8
1
1
s
i
I
I
1 I
i
I
@
lll Ii
t 1 1 If
j
l5
T
131 r
tI I
I
r
J
l I II I 1 J
tll
I
i I
ItrrIf
I
I
1
I
I
I
f II
I
1
jl I
1111 ill i
I
Illj
I
I
Jill i I
I
I
I
I
l
ns
ST
k
1
L
1
o
d
a
0
r
1
Q
L
J
I
I
i
51
k
i
i 111
I
1111I I j
i
J Ii 1111 h
i iu tC
i II
I
i
i liiliil iii illlilllli ii I ll ai liil III i
09
UR
Q2
f
U
7
lt1il8leilli@@IlII
ii lill
f
L
7
0
1
1
iI Ii
c
A
rya
J
J
f
I
r
I
j
b1 T
LJIUll
I
I
T
mmr mim Tm ir ll rI iu II Ilu I
I l
I
I
ll
l
I
I I
I
jlil T
i
II II
OtoJlDlD 01 0
I
51D
1
1 u o
1
ljlh
IllHlill lilIl lillI
I
I
IUIhll3111 Ui
U
L
Cl ll t
I
I
1
III
Ill i
fl lli i
i
I
I
I
I
L
I
I
I
L
I
I
tI
I
tti h r
rl
iL
l
i
il
I
8
fJ
0
J
fIo C
0
r CIl
a
3
a
3
o OQ
O
5
3
Z c
0
tI c
0
l
tI
0
0
1J
4
i
hi
1 U
u
2
c
8
i
0
vi
OJ
o
I
v
9
z
rTJ
UI
tl
11 00
J
0
m
0 m 0 m
i
Iii
11 0
Ol
o
N 0
5l
t J 0
III
l 1lI
8Cl
1lI
UlZUI
I o
Jm t
0
r r
z
coo l
z
1
1 l
il i
i
III
rTJ
0
Q
i
Vl c
L L
iE E
i Ii
IL
il
I I
J
I
I L
J I I
I
1
t
J
I
L I I
I
I
1
STREET
ILJ
L
I
e
I
I
I
I
J
d
r
J
J
I
I
r
r
r
lL S
I
I
I L
illJ
I
l
I I
l
I I
0
I
I J
i
1
I
I
I
I
l
i
1
i
L
I
I
I
l
I
2
i
2
2
IdI
I
J
iu
l
E
I
i
TI
7
Lu
i
1
t
T
rluu
E
II LJ I LJ 1
Tlu
u
I
T
I
oo
78 10
8
58 95
L
II II
P
t
t
61 9J
1
0
L
1
A
25
i
1
J28 97
I
i
I
U
j
tJ t
a
j
it
a
CJ
a
tl
25
R
Q
z
E
I
I
III
II
4
t
11IIII
I
L
4
S
I
I
T
I
E
i
tIl
tIl
i
2J 5
12J
ITl
i
Y
i I i I 1 I ii i I uLuuJu
H
1
L
I
I
I
lei
NORTH
1tI
I
1
i
01
I
1
1
i
I
I
1
1
Url
IZ
ii
j U II
E
T
25
25
I
I
I
I
i
I
2J
5
i
I
i
lll
I I
I
I
8 ill
r
r
t
h
ii
I
w
I
it i
IA
a
L
I
I
I
I
9
I L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I 1
i
STREET
1
L
I
I
I
I
I
l
il
I
L
H
i J
I
i iL tj i
O
I
I
t
t
L
I
I
r
I
I
I
r
I
r
I
I
I
HIJ
f
J5
II
I
11
I
OJ il
lS Iii
l 3
A
U
l
t
a
g
N
l OJ
Ol
b
a
lS
a
J t
V
3
a
CJl
a
3
Ol
j
C
g
iS
il
E
Q
1n
3
g
s
ti
a Cii
S
l115
tJC
t
Ol
Ol
r
0
m
m
0
m
0
l
a
l
trT
1 St h C G
l i
g
Cl
if OJ
it
Cl
Q
lS i m m ii b
s
l
lr s
rt
g
tb
Ncaa
S
1il s
A
a
1il bSo tJ Vn
A
if
il
l1
8
1 t
J
r
r
sr
it
en
t
0I 3
i il
OS
c
Jl 0
i S
t
b
il
OJ
lS Iii
so
A
ll t
OJ
r
ilt
C
Q
5
Q
O
g
C
tii
g
0
SB1 lj i
ta
I
1
t
Q
e
ii
Cl
rt
r
s
Jrr Al
al
0
I
I
II
II
E
LJ
B
l
T
L
H
A
V
jL
A
i
E
N E
u
U
J
L
i
1
Li
11l li
Q A
d
om
E
C
li
L
iS it
il
A
B
I I I
1
8
STREET
fil
S
lii
li
g
T
1
l
I
552 9512
488 3194
1
j t
e
m
i
II
i
I
SUITE 3
I
I
ttt
f
i
tj
ST
w
1
I
ASHLAND OREGON 97520
545
j
Q
is
S
541
R
FAX
U
DID I
i
j
J
jl 11 @ 1 I
Ashland Oregon
H
L
t
JJ
1 @ I
541
T
L
1 1
t
IG
Ii
D
I
I
1
A
PH
r
I
NOR
1 rJJ
1
1
4
r
1
I I I
i
I
L
1
I
L L
IlI I
I
1
I@
J
i
h
j
M
247 Otis Street
HELMAN SPRINGS SUBDIVISION
I
I
I
I
TR E
I
I
I
11
G
l
L
r
1
eY
l
A
I
Z
I
I
I
h
I
I
I
L
I
10
I
E
g
DRA
L
I SAGE DEVELOPMENT LLe
Cj
O
82
I
c
i5
ra
ro ll o J oQ
ro
0
5
1ii
8
5
tu
1
o
V
re i
Jgtii Iii
tJi l 9
tIl Q
f2
nl O iS
4
if
OJ
Iii
lS
Ii
I C
g
win
i J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
II
II
J
1
I
I L
9
I
OGc
I
20 sda
I
I Ashland Ore Qon
247 Otis Street
HELMAN SPRINGS SUBDIVISION
I
l
T
@
61 9
L
lr
6
11
t KJ llr I
J I
I
@p 11014 f
r
I
SAGE DEVELOPMENT LLC
tll
I
ii
I
l I
I 20
c
I
i
@
ommc
J
Ii
i
1
I 61
Development
of Ashland li
l Cit
J
IlN
L J UI
I
t
r
REC I E
1014
selbadc
10
I
I
r
I
1014
2O Sol
I
fi
4l
l J 1
tI
jlitr r
t 11
L
@
l
t
ll
I
I
J
h
jt
J
I r
I
A
STREET SUITE 3
541 541
PH FAX
552 9512
488 3194
ASHLAND OREGON 97520
545
J
STREET
WILLOJ
1 Oi 111
I
I
I
i
6
J
ba
Rl
3
I 5
aiil
a
r
Jm ir
l
i
j
5 f
r
0
a iiI u
i
II
iJl r
S
li
a
s
K
Jl
g
a
g
u
g
a
f q
5
I
D
1
2g
8
s El
s
ss
R
1
1
I
i
i li
i
I
rl
i S a
Q
I
S
ii
iiI
eil
g
ia
i
S
l i0
i
I
as
C oq
q
i
il
I
8
ii l
I
rln i i1l
I
g
tl
2
S
m
S
1
I
f
5 R
Hl
N
Il
1
q
II
IS
I
f
o
r
r
II
1
il
i
t
t
iiI
ilal ag
O
b
i
t
a
3 g ij
O
i6t
I
h
I
ai 1
o
I
sti I
li
is
I
C
12
b
a
li lll
ir
git2 oc
rI1i 6
a
rbt ga Ii
s
I
s
Ia It
3
ii I
I
ri
OQ
S
lllmiri
q i
a
Q
II
i
2
0
3S
i l
II I8
Q
i
i
Q
l
i
c
o
gill
o
i
II iita
a
ua U F Q 5
I
Cl
Ii
g
a
1 g
O
3
t
s
1
g
8
g
C
i
i
lr
3
a
l
1I
ii
i
1
a
I
c
1
g
g
1
N
o
m
rn
Ashland Oregon
247 Otis Street
HELMAN SPRINGS SUB DIVISION
li
l
l
e
i
f
ffi
l
i
ll
ll
lllll
e
t t
il
l
i
9
i
ft
1
I
I
ili r
l i
il
IJ
r
I JI
l
71
J
g
u
t
if
f
i
l
i f
1
r
i
1l
1
l
a g
i
ill
I
I
j
L
I
I
F
LJ
I
I
1
L
r I I
L
I
I
Ir
L
1
I
L
I
I
J
I
I
l
I
n
c
1
s
1
I
i
E
g
i
ib
S
i t
7
A
1
4
ai
y
f
I
a g
R
I
I b
s
I
Ctl
t
s
i
I
tit 11
i t
tl
ir
Q
g
1
t
1
ii i
8
i
8 t
J
o
S
l i I
1
i
S
Ci
i
ol
tJ
l
II
t
A
s
1
J c
Q1
IJ
i
s
a
I
i
I
f
1
I
g
FAX
PH
54i
541
552 9512
488 3194
J
J
Cl
Cr
tb
g
b 3
t 3
t IJ
Jt
sH
i
a
e s
f
i Z
l
S
lli
1l
lJ
tJ
9
l
i
0i
Cilia
i il6
n Jl
il
l I
S ci3 e
f m
1il
sl fllil s
g
s
t
jQ
lQo
B s
aJiQfg
tl
l
tna fIlQl
o
ga
g
1t aCl
gi
l 4 ctll
Rlg
g
Q
l
iilgiit
o
U n i1f
ctl
l 1
1
a a
s
O
r
30
illS
Q
sii Q
s
s rs
i 5 il
Si
J 1t
I
aalh
ii CQ
1
10003
gi5 ll
i
a
I
1 I
tI1
I
Q
f
1
US
S ts il
Cl
ctS
i2c
ij
s
8
S
gU
r
ill
i
i
e9 a
B
STREET SUITE 3
I
O
il Il
ir
il
il o
aR
Q
alll
0
S
ii
ll cl
Q
JI
I
s
1
F Ji
ASHLAND OREGON 97520
545
2
c5
ljl
it
Q
Cb
o
3
lh
I
r
ga
i
a
i
0
1
ii
aR
I
l
l
i
Q
fl
i lrgga
n
6
iiil
11
li
l
51
a
i
I
i
c
t g a
l
e
iil
i a
fi
a
I
O
l
I 0
R
lrell
L
i
il
i
i
i
I
rrli ll
5
tsll
s
g
ii
i I lall iiil g2i
ii
li I 1
3
ii 1
i5
ili
tlS a
1
i
1
l
J
t
I
I
I
I J
i
tJ
I
rl
It
I
ITTl
L r
ir
I
I
ll I I n 01
i
i
i
1 1
if
1
i
L
I
I
I
L
I
I I
I
I
i
11
g
fi
5
Ii
lit
I
J
o
ll
8 8 8 8 R8
l
iiI
s
i
B
I
filii
5
l i
5
i5in r il
U
i
111
I
l
i Ii g r
I
elS
2
al
i
li i l 1I
1IIIII iRii
0
I
j
g
I
El
t
j
j j i 0
d
Ii
11
t t
I
Cl
I
i
l
i
Ililli at
l
o
of
I
L I
I I J
g
ll R
1
i
I
I
Cl
a
i
I I
ii
i
i
i
U
IIi Ii
l
i
i
ii jh
o
s
U
i
3t
8
I
I
18i
III
g
8 8 8 8
r
r
1
8
il
s
i i
r
I r s
I
g
l l
3
s
1
l
a
il
I
J
t
I
r J
w
g
i
ft
j lil l if iiI ai I
V
1
I
J
L
1
I
D
il
n rn
g
a
h
t i
I
g
I a
i
s
I
I i
a
illlllil i 1
Rf
ltlgllil is i iig
Il
SAGE DEVELOPMENT LLC
01
d
a
I
l I
li
o
s
iI
111
Q
itl
Jlrl 11
O
I 2 ihr
Ig
ISf
I
g4e
I I
I
g
J
0
g
tliQ lli
a
li
Q
S
I 1111il 11
1
1
l ll
Ili i
i
i
j f o
2
m
3
lilc3 ir l2 ilir I1 6 I g i lliJ I i
b
8i
I II j I t I llllllllllil i iil l a5 I2 iliilii
Zs
i
r
Ci a Ii
i
III
l
s
ria
a m
a
l IlmrssO iS
a
i
i
I a i
I
I
aRI
II
il
b
Ii
lr
IR
i
iH
R
o l uo
co
L
1
S
11111
i
R
h Ii i
30
3
o
IS
2
I II 51
r
1
3
8
a
S n
I I I I G
I I
I 1 I I I I I I I
I
I
I I I
I
fiiz
C
I
I
0
I
0
Ii
II
0
i
P
I S
Ii
II
iIIi
ns
Ci
1
c
5
a
e
I
a
i
I
I
II
1
11
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ii U II
I
ll
I
1 llliI lli i 1 I
B
a
Is
Q
I
s
e
i
pnUUUUl1 II i
II I I
I I I I I I
I
11
I
f
o
o
o
o
o
I
I
5 r
0
r
Q
39
o
o
D r l
o m
rn
1 II
I
I
fI
JI
l
I
l
I I ill I
f
I
or
8
Ii
r
I
I
I
i
I
i
r
l
I
I
f
0
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
rn
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
In I
L
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
i
I
i
t
I
0
1
1
Sla
EB
i
a
H
I
I
I
il I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 It
2 0l k TLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATIOr this form is to be completed
only by planning department
JRM
staff for
mapped
wetlands waterways
DEP ARTMENT OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS PROGRAM 775 Summer Street NE Suite 100 Salem OR 97301 1279 503 378 3805 1
County
Jackson
County
Local Case File
City Ashland
Responsible 2
DSL File
r8J City
Jurisdiction
APPLICANT
Sage Development
PA2006 00078
WN
0 County
DSL
LLC
LANDOWNER
Project
J 21
jf Of LjqtJCfO
completed by DSL Staff
Sage Development
name
LLC
name
2305 Ashland Street
2305 Ashland Street
mailing address Suite C446
mailing
address
mailing
address
Suite C446
mailing address Ashland 97520
r c
Ashland 97520
city
state
zip
city
541 488 4114
state
J
zip
541 488 4114
phone 3
completed by DSL Staff
Tjl
phone
LOCATION T 39
R IE
Address
street
city
S 04
14 BC
Tax Lot
s
400
r J
247 Otis Street
NWI quad
map name 4a Attach all the following with site marked Ifapplicable attach 8J Other 4
LWI
NWI
if no LWI map
Map
Parcel
Map
Site Plan
if any
SITE INFORMATION NWI Wetland Classification Codes LWI
Adjacent Waterway 5
s
Significant
if any
WetlandRiparian Area
Zoning
R 1 5P
PROPOSED ACTIVITY
o site plan approval o grading permit o conditional use permit
8J subdivision o planned unit development o building permit new structures
o Other
Project Description Proposal
Completed by
to subdivide one
parcel
into 22 tax lots for
single family
Contact Maria Harris Senior Planner
Phone
DSL RESPONSE A removal fill A removal fill A removal fill
permit permit permit
552 2045
r
required from the Department of State Lands will be required when the development project proceeds may be required
may be required by the Corps of Engineers Information needed includes de erminatio
o
o o
541
is
aA permit
E5 A wetland
development
Date 2 13 06
Address City of Ashland 20 E Main St Ashland OR 97520
o o
residential
deline tion repo
503 808 4373
Co sultants
t encl sed
L l
V issued 0 has been applied for No removal fill permit is required for the described project iflbecause State Permit
0
was
Comments
RECE l
o On Site Visit By Response completed by If the project is changed to http
www
oregonstatelands
Date
Uo oval from the wetlands us
wetlanduse htm
area
City of
a
state
Date
removal fill
Ashland
Community Development
August
2004
Name
flanQ JJanis
Time
info@sagedevgroup
furfl
Subject Date
MEMO
d
Suite C4 4 6 PHONE lOG
1
t R
2305 Ashland St Ashland
OR 97520
SITE VISIT
Project
TO
com
MEETING MEMO
tl
PH
5414884114
FX
541 488 4566
OTHER
ro
zIcrrJ
nD YJ
Ufl1tnt3fiy DO
PJcrn t
fYldo Arr
n OOO
2COtp
JCQ
fJh cerb1 Dcr A
AoVJ
fly Aili D
c u
FEB 0 8 2006 t
fJ
3
i
r r
if
U
iii
Q f1 l
C
1 t
L
J
hlty
Feb 07 06 05 04p
De ian
p 2
4566 488 541
Aguirre
I S lvia Chunbera to
8Cti au
n
hereby authorize Sttae Development lLC to file the PllI1ning referenced above I have legal authority for this property aad do hereby make this
rization to
act
2
W
7
CJ
Date
F EC I
lr
il
FEB 0 8 WUb
City o f Ashic r d o Field 0 Office 0 County
ta
d
z aaat
LaL
SM3H
W
W
Wd
t
9a
Z 9aa
La
a3
FROM
FRX
NO
7eI74453471
Feb
07 2e06 01 56PM
Pi
RORY A HANSON Law Corporation Os K SIft CI ronn 9
1
Eureka c Tclr
70n 4452011
February
fa
471
101
2006
7
FAX
City of Ashland
541
488
5566
E Main Street Ashland Oregon 97520 20
Gentlepersons connection with her This office represents Sylvia Chambers in as well as the estate of her in California various real properties I understand that Aili Eggert and Aili Bggert deceased mother to real property in Ashland Sylvia Chambers held title jointly is to a Sage Development the real subject Said property Oregon the sole heir of Aili Chambers was and is Sylvia Agreement own she has the exclusive right to negotiate AS such Eggert real property in Ashland otherwise encumber all or
liquidate
Oregon
now
subject
to
Sage Development
a
request
The title to the was and separate property a If So termination of joint tenancy is joint I enclose be that can readily and easily accomplished necessary certificate a copy of the Aili Eggert death It
held
is
her
sole
tenants
as
If you have any questions in connection with the authority of or otherwise deal Sylvia Chambers to own possess sell encumber in her name Aili with real property held andlor Eggert please of my office Sylvia advise Aili Eggert was a long time clien Chambers is similarly a long time client of my office Feel
free to contact
the
undersigned
Very truly yours
y
RAH
A
SON
bgm
encl cc
Devian Aguirre
Sylvia
R
Sage Development
Chambers
J
r
L
n
C
1
City
1
c1
99SS
BBto
ltoS
aso
r
a
Isa
C
J I
0 l
8 2006
FEB
J Field
J
Q
i i
c
County
c
c1gto
yo
90
loa
l qa
I
i
t 1j1
I
JrA d w Ra
Q 3 2Cln
12l1OOl1
2
1
11 1
t
nt
IL 9
MIl
Fl
blld
uua
C
Ca1 lAc 1 D
f
1
kdIdIllral
S
Il P
iii
0 0
Fall
I
f
O
1iJ J L I
i I
0
0
Ita
0II
0
W5
C I o
o D
l
gO c
00
o
o
CD
tI
E
00
i3 W lL
0 0 CD
u
tf 1IIr
1
I
lI
SO I C
rJ
1 I
1
t
a
eaPY
L
27510
OI1
11lls belruO encl IWEIlI U DrQ
III
1IIIlIICt n at oIIIcelll lite It
lClF CIOuIII
ac 1 Iil
0
l 8 0
T
Z
d
9999
88
t
9
aso
C
a
lsa
de
to
90
loO
l qa
TLAND LAND USE NOTUICATIOl this foml is
to
be
completed only by planning department
staff for
iM
mapped
wetlands waterways
DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS WETLANDS PROGRAM 775 Summer Street NE Suite 100 Salem OR 97301 1279 503 378 3805 1
County
Jackson County
Local Case File
City Ashland Responsible Jurisdiction 2
DSL File
D County
City
DSL
APPLICANT Sage Development LLC
PA2006 00078
WN
tgll11pleted hy
LANDO VNER
name
address
Suite C446
mailing address
address
mailing
address
AshlancL27520 city
state
zip
city
4114 488
state
zip
541 488 4114
phone
phone
LOCATION T39
RIL
Address
street
NWl
quad map Attach all the
city
l S I
BC
lax Lot
400
s
247 Otis Street
name
1
following
vvith site marked
If applicable attach
LWI
N Vl
Map
if no L VI mar
Parcel
Site Plan if any
Map
8J Other
SITE INFORMATION LWI NWI Wetland Classification Codes
Adjacent 5
mailing Suite C 446
Ashland 97520
4
LLC
2305 Ashland Street
mailing
3
Development
e
DSL Staffi
name
2305 Ashland Street
541
L9 l11plded bv DSL Staff
Project
vraterway
s
Significant
Vetland
Riparian
if any
Area
Zoning
R l 5P
PROPOSED ACTIVITY
o site plan approval 8J subdivision o grading pemlit 0 planned unit Clopment de o conditional use pemlit 0 building pennit new o Other Project Description Proposal to subdivide one parcel Completed by Contact Maria Harris Address City ofAshland 20 EMain
structures
into 22
tax
lots ft r single
Senior Planner
family
Date
S1Ashland OR 97520
Phone
13 2
residential
development
06 541
552 2045
DSL RESPONSE
o A removal fill pennit is required from the Departmem of State Lands
o A removal fill pennit will be required when the development project proceeds o A removal fill pel1lilt may be required o A permit may be required by the Corps of Engineers 503 i08 43 73 o Information needed includes o o
A wetland detemlination delineation report Consultants list enclosed
o State Permit
o
No removal fill
0 pennit
is
required
was
issued
for the described
0 has been applied project if because
for
Comments
o On Site Visit By Response completed by If the project is changed to http
www
oregonstatelands
Date Date involve fill us
or
removal from the wetlands
wetlanduse htm
area
a
state
removal fill permit will be
required August 2004
ENGINEERS
MANAGERS
PROJECT
PLANNERS
RECEIVED 1
JAM 13
I
Cfty tI AthIfnI Community D8veIopment
HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
11EDFORD OREGON
JANUARY
G 2006
RH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 117
1
1 MAINSIIZH1SIIIfl
Il
MILil fli
lIZll
N
1
1 7S
SII77
I
l
fAX S4177
I
11
1RII
vVII UI l
lM
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
JRH
HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
MU Ft
Rl
l
g
j
I JRH 117S leAST M
IN
STRUT
In I
RENEWAL DATE
lRh
t
IN
J
3 llofc
2
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
Mf
Fl 1RIl llfUl
l
N
7S4
77 S41 l
I
I
j
FAX
77l S41
7H
IIU III
II IWI h l
M
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND JRH
Transportation Engineering performed an analysis of potential traffic impacts for the proposed Helman Springs Homes development on Township 39 Range IE Section 04BC tax lot 400 The site is located west of Laurel Street between Otis Street and Randy Street in Ashland Oregon Total acreage ofthe property is equal to 4 38 development includes build out of 20 single
traffic
generation
for 20 SFR
Springs Homes family residential SFR dwelling units The units is 191 average daily trips with 20 in the PM dwelling
peak hour and 15 in the AM
peak
The
will extend
proposed development
Street west of Willow Street and the
Drager
acres
The
proposed
Helman
hour
Drager
Street to the north to intersect with
Access to the site is
proposed
from Otis Street
Randy
Randy Street
Street extension
Willow Street Laurel Street study area includes the intersections of Randy Street Otis Otis Street Laurel Street and Street Randy Street Drager Street A level of service analysis was prepared for study area intersections under existing year 2005 year 2006 no build and year 2006 build conditions Analyses were prepared for the AM and PM peak hours ofthe day The
RESULTS All intersections within the
study
area
operate acceptably
under
existing
2005 year 2006
no
build and year 2006 build conditions
Study area streets were shown Springs Homes development
to have sufficient
capacity
to
serve
the
proposed
Helman
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 1 JANUARY 6 2006 IHELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 13 1
fP
J
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3
1 0
6
INTRODUCTION
2 0 SITE DESCRIPTION
8
2 1 ROAD SySTEM
8
2 2 TRAFFIC
8
COUNTS 2 3 TRAFFIC VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS
8
2 3 1 SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT
8
2 3 2 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC ADJUSTMENT
10
3 0 TRIP GENERATION
10
4 0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
10
5 0 INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE MEASURE
12
6 0 EXISTING PERFORMANCE MEASURES
12
6 1 ADJUSTED YEAR 2005 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
12
6 2 EXISTING STREET CAPACiTY
13
7 0 BUILD
NO BUILD PERFORMANCE MEASURES
14
7 1 YEAR 2006 BUILD AND NO BUILD PERFORMANCE ANALYSES
14
7 2 YEAR 2006 STREET
14
CAPACiTY
8 0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
17
LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2 1
STUDY AREA ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
8
TABLE 3 1
AM
TABLE 6 1
ADJUSTED YEAR 2005 STUDY AREA PERFORMANCE
TABLE 7 1
YEAR 2006 BUILD
PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATIONS
10
NO BUILD PERFORMANCE
ANALySES ANALYSES
12 14
LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1
VICINITY MAP
7
FIGURE 2 EXISTING YEAR 2005 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PM
9
FIGURE 3 DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PM
11
FIGURE 4 YEAR 2006 NO BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PM
15
FIGURE 5 YEAR 2006 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PM
16
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I JANUAR Y 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 14 f I e
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
SITE PLAN
APPENDIX II
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT DATA
APPENDIX III
TUBE COUNT DATA
APPENDIX IV
EXISTING YEAR 2005 SYNCHRO OUTPUT
APPENDIX V
YEAR 2006 NO BUILD SYNCHRO OUTPUT
APPENDIX VI
YEAR 2006 BUILD SYNCHRO OUTPUT
APPENDIX VII
ATR INFORMATION
APPENDIX VIII
CITY OF ASHLAND STREET DESIGN STANDARDS
JRH TRANsrORTATION ENCINEERINC I JANUARY 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 15 I
J
10 INTRODUCTION Transportation Engineering performed an analysis of potential traffic impacts for proposed Helman Springs Homes development on Township 39 Range IE Section 04BC JRH
lot 400
The site is located west of Laurel Street between Otis Street and Refer to Figure 1 for
Ashland Oregon
a
vicinity
Total acreage of the property is equal to 4 38 includes build out of 20 development single traffic
generation
peak hour and The
for 20 SFR
15 in the AM
peak
The
Drager
study
area
tax
Street in
map The
acres
family
Springs Homes dwelling units The daily trips with 20 in the PM
proposed
residential
units is 191 average
Helman
SFR
hour
will extend
proposed development
Street west of Willow Street and the
dwelling
Randy
the
Drager
Street to the north to intersect with
Access to the site is
proposed
from Otis Street
Randy
Randy Street
Street extension includes the
following intersections
Willow Street
1
Randy Street
2
Laurel Street
3
Otis Street
Laurel Street
4
Otis Street
Drager
A level of service
Randy Street
analysis
Street
prepared
for
study
intersections under
existing year Analyses prepared for the less than the PM peak typically hour but in this case there is a school within a quarter mile ofthe proposed development and the AM peak is larger than the PM peak For this reason both peak hours were evaluated was
area
2005 year 2006 no build and year 2006 build conditions AM and PM peak hours ofthe day The AM peak hour is
were
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I JANUARY 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TlA 16
37L
FIGURE 1
VICINITY MAP
NEVADA STREET
r
RANDY STREET
II OTIS STREET
LLl
l
I V
cr
cC I
LLl
V
Ci l
cC
J
a
i
o
10 1
Iv 1
LEGEND VICINITY MAP
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 117S E
MAIN STREET SUITE IC
MEDfORD OREGON
97501
NOT TO SCALE
JRH
TRANS ORTATll N ENCINEERINC
I1ANUARY
6 2006
IHELMAN j C
SPRINGS HOMES TIA
17
2 0 SITE DESCRIPTION The
development is located west ofLaurel Street between Randy Proposed access is to be taken from Otis Street Randy Street extension through the site Drager Street
proposed
Helman
Otis Street and and the
Springs
Homes
Street
1 ROAD SYSTEM 2 The
general
TABLE
1 2
characteristics of streets in the
study
area are
provided
in Table 2 1
STUDY AREA ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Roadway
Functional
Number of
Classification
Lanes I
Curb Gutter
Design Speed
Sidewalks
Bike Lanes
Direction Laurel Street
Neighborhood
Posted Bus Routes
1
Yes
20 MPH
No
No
No
1
Yes
20 MPH
No
No
No
1
Yes
20 MPH
Varies
No
No
1
Yes
20 MPH
No
No
No
1
Yes
20 MPH
No
No
No
Residential Otis Street
Neighborhood Residential
Randy
Street
Neighborhood Residential
Drager
Street
Neighborhood Residential
Willow Street
Neighborhood Residential
2 2 TRAFFIC COUNTS Count data for
study
area
Refer to Appendices II
Application
was
prepared during November of 2005
III for data
3 TRAFFIC VOLUME 2 3 1 SEASONAL 2
streets and intersections
ADJUSTMENTS
ADJUSTMENT
of seasonal
adjustment factors
accounts for the fact that volumes
to fluctuate from month to month because ofincreased recreational
traffic
on
etc
streets tend
Since
taken throughout the year count data needs to be converted to the peak month ofthe year to represent 30th highest hour volumes Converting count data to 30th manual counts
are
accomplished using data collected at ODOT Automated Traffic Recorder ATR stations or using local historical data if available For purposes ofthis study ATR 15 014 along OR 99 was the closest ATR to the site Traffic volumes along OR 99 are much larger than those in the study area but the street characteristics are similar because OR 99 carries a large volume oflocal traffic Historical count data specific to the study area would have been preferable but none was available Based upon this ATR 15 014 was used to develop a seasonal adjustment factor Evaluating data over five years produced a seasonal adjustment factor of 1 11 for November counts Refer to Appendix VII for ATR information Refer to Figure 2 for adjusted year 2005 traffic volumes highest
hour volumes is
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I JANUARY 6 20061HELMANSPRlNGSHOMESTIA 18
FIGURE 2
AD YR 2005
NEVADA
AM PM
STREET
JL
I I
0 6
8 1
i
22 10
8 4
L
4 2
F
RANDY STREET
oJ O
I
I
J C
0 10
17 19
1
49 26 8
221 I
0 1
91 49 26 3 1
4 102
43
4 J40
L
C
I
OTIS STREET 3 1 23
4 11
1
10 8
f
0
r 1 1
4 2
I
V
6 2
i
l
22
oJ
ff
I
103
133 75
I
V
c
c
l
l L
V
lJ
U
Jl
c
c
o
i
O
1C I l 1
VI1
LEGEND FIGURE 2
AD YR 2005 AMlPM
RH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 1I75 E
MAIN STREET SUITE IC
MEDFORD OREGON
97501
1 NOT TO SCALE
Y
JRH TRANSrl RTATIUN ENGINEERINC I JANUARY G 200GIHELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TlA 19 J J
I
I
J
3 2 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC 2 The
proposed development
and 2006 build scenarios data
Growth rates
Appendix
VII for
is scheduled for
were
derived
completion in year 2006 Year 2006 no build by applying a growth rate to existing 2005 count
determined based
were
growth
ADJUSTMENT
on
historical data from ATR 15 014
Refer to
rate information
3 0 TRIP GENERATION trips for the proposed Helman Springs Homes development is estimated based upon the trip generation for single family residential dwelling units Trip generations are based upon the ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Edition Refer to Table 3 1 The number of vehicular
for results TABLE
1 3
PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION
land Use
Land
Size
Use Helman
AM
Trip
AM
ADT
ADT
PM
PM
Trip Rate
Trips
Trip Rate
Trips
Rate
TriDS
9 57
191
1 01
20
0 75
15
Springs
Homes Development
Single Family SFR
210
20DU
Total
20
15
4 0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Project trips were distributed Street Randy Street Drager evaluation of the local
street
based upon existing traffic volumes on Laurel Street Otis In an Street and Willow Street within the study area
system
a
larger percentage
of trips
were
shown to
come
from
and go to the south during the PM peak hour During the AM peak hour a larger percentage ofinbound trips were shown to come from the north and east while outbound trips favored
going to the south Based upon this approximately 70 ofinbound trips 8 trips during the PM peak hour were estimated to come from the south and 30 3 trips from the north and east During the AM peak hour approximately 25 of inbound trips 1 trip were estimated from the north and east Fifty five percent of to come from the south and 75 3 trips outbound trips 6 trips during the AM peak hour were estimated to go to the south and 45 5 trips to the north and east Similarly 70 ofoutbound trips 5 trips during the PM peak 2 trips to the north and east Refer to hour were estimated to go to the south and 30 distributions 3 for Figure development trip
JRH TRANSP lRTATION ENGINEERING 1 JANUARY 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMESTIA 110 j
v J
i
FIGURE 3
DEVELOPMENT TRIPS
AM PM
NEVADA STREET
0 0
I 0
0 3 5
0
7
I
2
I RANDY
STREET 0 0 2
1
JIL
0
3 0
OL O
0 3
0 0
II 1 1
1
ll5 U L U L
1 1
I
J jo
0 1
3 5 03
f
0
1 1
0 0
Jl 1
0 3
I
1
a f V U L
a l
s
o
ICf
1 f
I
Uf
LEGEND
I
FIGURE 3
DEVElOPMENT TRIPS
AMlPMI
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 1175 E MAIN STREET SUITE IC MEDFORD OREGON
97501
J NOT TO SCALE
JR H TRANSr IR TATION ENCJlNEER INC I JANUARY 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA III I
J
5 0 INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE MEASURE The intersection
analysis was level of service LOS Level of service is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort including such elements as travel time number of stops total amount of stopped delay and impediments caused by other vehicles afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment It was developed to quantify the quality of service of transportation performance
used in the
measure
facilities
average delay defined as the average total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line Average delay is measured in seconds per vehicle per hour and then translated into a grade or level of LOS is based
on
service for each intersection LOS is the
performance
standard for intersections under the
jurisdiction of the City of Ashland and Jackson County LOS ranges from A to F with A indicating the most desirable condition and F indicating the most unsatisfactory condition LOS D is the minimum acceptable level ofservice for streets and intersections Performance method
measures were
implemented in
evaluated
according
to the
Highway Capacity
Manual
HCM
SYNCHRO Version 6
6 0 EXISTING PERFORMANCE MEASURES 1 6
ADJUSTED YEAR
2005 PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
Adjusted year 2005 conditions account for seasonally adjusted count volumes service analysis was prepared at study area intersections under adjusted conditions Results are provided in Table 6 1 TABLE
1 6
ADJUSTED YEAR
year 2005
2005 STUDY AREA PERFORMANCE ANALYSES Control
LOS
AM
PM
Type
Standard
Existing Year 2005
Existing Year 2005
LOSD
LOS A
LOSA
LOSD
LOS A
LOS A
Otis Street
Stop I Unsignalized Stop I Unsignalized
LOSD
LOS A
LOS A
Street
I Unsignalized
LOSD
LOS A
LOS A
Intersection
Laurel Street
A level of
Randy
4 Way
Street
Stop I
UnsiQnalized
Randy
Street
Laurel Street Otis Street
Willow Street
Drager
As shown in Table 6 1 minimums under
Stop all
adjusted
study
area
shown to operate within standard Refer to Appendix IV for SYNCHRO
intersections
year 2005 conditions
are
output
jRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I JANUARY 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 112
6 2 EXISTING STREET CAPACITY The
City
of Ashland has street
design standards with desirable average daily trip ADT volumes for various street classifications Table 1 on page 20 of the Street Standards Handbook lists less than 1 500 ADT for neighborhood residential streets and 1 500 5 000 ADT for neighborhood collector residential streets Otis Street Drager Street Willow Street and Randy Street fit the neighborhood residential standard while Laurel Street meets the
neighborhood collector residential standard because it gathers trips from various smaller residential streets and distributes them to Orange Avenue and Nevada Street The design for all area streets is 20 miles speed study per hour and tube count information shows that all currently carry less than 1 500 ADT Study area streets therefore conform to the neighborhood residential street design standards
street standard
Refer to
Appendix
VIII for the
City
of Ashland
Street
capacity is not commonly measured directly from the traffic volume on a given roadway Capacity is commonly evaluated based upon the operation of intersections along the roadway When intersections reach level of services above level of service D then it is commonly determined that additional capacity is necessary or signalization is required The livability of a roadway on the other hand is commonly measured by traffic volumes and traffic speeds Many local agencies have desired roadway volume ranges provided in transportation system plans or street standards handbooks similar to that of the City of Ashland For purposes of this report capacity is measured by intersection operation and street livability by the traffic volume and design speed section of
The
capacity
of all streets within the
study
is shown to be
adequate under existing year This is based upon a level of service D or better at all study area The livability of streets within the study area is also shown to be area
2005 conditions
intersections based upon
adequate
design speeds
of20 miles per hour and tube counts taken along each study area street Results ofthe tube counts show that all study area streets currently carry less than 1 500 ADT Refer to Appendix III for tube count data
jRH TRANSPl RT A TIUN ENGINEERING I JANUARY 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 113 f
I
7 0 BUILD
NO BUILD PERFORMANCE MEASURES
1 YEAR 2006 BUILD AND NO BUILD PERFORMANCE ANALYSES 7 Year 2006
build conditions account for
no
increased
seasonally adjusted
count volumes that have been
rate to reflect year 2006 traffic volumes but do not
by appropriate growth project trips Year 2006 build conditions are no build volumes that are increased by project trips and therefore represent full build conditions Both scenarios are evaluated to compare the impacts of general background growth to specific development impacts Results are provided in Table 7 1 an
include
TABLE
1 7
YEAR 2006 BUILD
Intersection
Laurel Street
Randy
LOS Standard
Laurel Street
Proposed
AM
PM
AM
PM
No Build
No Build
Build
Build
Performance
Performance
Performance
Performance
Street
LOSD
LOS A
LOS A
LOS A
LOS A
Willow Street
LOSD
LOS A
LOS A
LOS A
LOS A
Otis Street
LOSD
LOS A
LOS A
LOS A
LOSA
Street
LOSD
LOS A
LOS A
LOS A
LOS A
Street
LOSD
LOS A
LOS A
Randy
Street
Otis Street
NO BUILD PERFORMANCE ANALYSES
Drager Drager
Randv Street
As shown in Table 7 1 year 2006
no
all
study
area
intersections
build and build conditions
shown to operate acceptably under Refer to Appendices V and VI for SYNCHRO are
output 7 2 YEAR 2006 STREET CAPACITY The
study area is shown to be adequate under year 2006 This is based upon a level of service D or better at all study intersections with the addition of background growth and development trips The
capacity
build and area
no
of all streets within the
build conditions
livability of all streets within the study area is also shown to be adequate The proposed Helman Springs Homes development is estimated to generate 191 ADT at full build out All study area streets are shown to carry less than 1 500 ADT with the addition of background growth and development trips under year 2006 no build and build conditions
jRH TRANSl llRTATION ENCiINEERINC IJANUARY G 200GIHELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 114
FIGURE 4
YR 2006 NO BUILD
NEVADA
AM PM
STREET
J
0 6
i I
L 6 1
22 10
j
4 6 4 2
L
r
RANDY STREET
0 0
I
I
0 10 17
19
49 26 6
221 II
IL
0 1 i
3 1
4 103
9 1
49 26
43
4 40
L I
OTIS STREET
J 4 11
1
I
0
Jf 2 3
105 49
i3s 4 2
1 1
3 1
10 6
4 2
26
ll
2
21
II
0 l V
I Ll
0
S
o
tVcE Iv tU I E
LEGEND
I
FIGURE 4
YR 200G NO BUILD AM PM
I
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING tr S E MAIN STREET SUITE Ie MEDFORD OREGON
97501
NOT TO SCALE
JRH TRANSr JRTATION ENCINEERINC I JANUARY G 200GIHELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 115
YR 2006 BUILD
FIGURE 5
AM PM
NEVADA STREET
97
t
J
10 5
0 0
3 5
1
JL 11 0
10 2
11 0 0
72
8 3
II Af R JDY
22 10
17L STREET
0
ISITEI
il
0
T 0 12
I
I
49 26 8
JIL 0 1
20 19 3 1
251
9 1
27 50
4 103
1 1
I
L
4 5
t
C
OTIS STREET
j
0j2 4 11
1IC
0 0
0
6 1
4 2
I
13
4 3
T
26
3
49 108
L
r79
21 2 H
1
t13
4 5
0 0
0 1
4
l V l LU
J l
o
toI Iv
tvI
LEGEND FIGURE 5
YR 2006 BUILD AM PM
lRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 1175 E MAIN STREET SUITE IC MEDFORD
OREGON
97501
J NOT TO SCALE
Y
JRH TRANSrY RTATION ENl INEERING I JANUARY 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 116 ill
1
7 0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIO NS All intersections within the
study
area
operate
acceptably
under
existing
2005 year 2006
no
build and year 2006 build conditions
Study area streets are shown to have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed Helman Springs Homes development The livability of study area streets is shown to be acceptable based upon maximum daily traffic volume standards provided in Table I of the City of Ashland Street Standards Handbook No
mitigation
is required
as a
result of development
jRH TRANSPORTATll N ENGINEERINC I JANUARY 6 20061HELMAN SPRINGS HOMES TIA 117 r
l i
JRH TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
APPENDIX I SITE PIAN
l
f
3
I I
9
I t
I I
I
111
I
I
I
r
5
s
I
9
l
3
in l T
r l
I
I
I
I
I
t
5
2
2
2
3
0
5
5
I
1l1 I
I
It
11 I I
I I
II I
J I
I
I
i
I
H I
I I I
S
I
j L
I
I I
I
f I
IT
II
II
tt
U
II
J
Ii
8i
cs
l l
S
Cl
II illl
U
I
I 1
I
I
II
f
11
1111I1
I
I
Utllll
IIIIIIIII
I II llIillll
a
lUlU
r
I
I I
I 5
51111111 11 I III I II I
tt I
H
Ti
i JI
iI J n 1 J n II I
Un ti ti
l I
I I I I I
i
WaiF i iz1ii
L
i
l r
l i
i
L
i
L
I
i
J
n
I
I n
il
rr n H
L
u
I I
II l
r
n
1 tl
I i
rI L
I
nIn
n
I
I
I
I
Ilrr
ti
I
i j
RH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
APPENDIX II TURNING MOVEMENT TRAFFIC COUNTS
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street Suite 1 C Medford Oregon 97501 File Name Site Code Start Date
Page
RandyWillowAMPM05 00000001 11 30 2005 1
No
Groups Printed Unshifted Randy
Willow From North
From East
Start
Rig
Thr
Time
ht
u
t
s
Factor
10
10
10
10
07 00
1
0
5
07 15
1
0
07 30
o
07 45
Lef Ped
App
Rig
T
Thr
ht
u
Randy
From South
Lef
Ped
t
s
App T
From West
Rig
Thr
Lef
ht
u
t
s
10
10
10
0
0
o
0
Ped
App
Rig
T
ht
Thr
Int
Lef Ped
u
t
10
10
10
o
0
o
I
Tota I
10
10
10
10
0
600
o
0
0
5
0
6
0
4
0
4
1
0
8
0
9
Total
3
0
22
0
25
08 00
2
o
4
08 15
3
o
2
08 30
1
o
08 45
o
Total
i
10 i
10 c
0
I
1
0
o
0
1
1
0
0
o
0
0
0
1
o
0
1
0
0
o
0
o
i
0
0
o
0
0
0
1
o
0
1
i
0
0
o
0
01
0
0
o
0
0
0
o
o
0
01
9
i
I
0
o
0
I
0
0
o
0
0
0
2
1
0
I
29
o
61
4
o
o
o
41
o
o
o
o
01
0
o
2
o
2
o
5
i
3
1
o
o
o
o
o
3
o
14
17
26
711
i
o
3
1
o
1
o
o
o
o
01 01
0
6
41
o
0
2
1
2
5
I
17
o
2
o
21
2
1
o
2
o
o
o
o
01
0
1
o
o
6
o
14
o
I
12
3
o
3
Il
18
I
o
o
o
o
01
0
6
3
16
251
63
16 00
2
o
5
o
o
o
o
6
I
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
13
o
1
o
3
o
o
o
3
I
01
1
71 21
6
16 15
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
1
I
16 30
1
o
4
o
51
6
o
o
o
61
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
1
o
1
16 45
1
o
3
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
1
Total
5
o
13
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
2
17 00
o
o
2
0
o
o
o
o
o
4
1
o
4
0
o
51
13
o
o
o
o
01
o
17 15
o
o
o
0
0
12
17 30
o
o
i
1
0
i
3
17 45
1
020
Total
I
09
i
20
I
7 1
8 5
1
12
BREAK
41
61 I
I
6 12
6
o
o
o
21
o
o
o
21
5
1
o
o
41
7
1
o
o
Ii
1
o
o
1
21
o
o
o
o
I
o
o
o
0
0
i 0 101
2
2
o
o
41
o
o
o
o
01
o
o
2
0
21
9
15
4
o
I
o
o
o
o
01
o
o
6 I
37
o
0
8
12
21
31
1
6
I
18
3
21
1
20
1
I
Grand 15
o
58
Total
Apprch
20
73
79 00
5
Total
o
8
00 5 33
8 8
49
0 0
0 0 9
42 7
7
0
4
117
0 0
6 7
60
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O0
28 1 4 7
0 0
3 2
35 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
4 7
7 0
18
38
47 4 10 22 2 5
171
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street
Medford
Willow From North Start
Rig
Time
ht
Thr
App Tot
t
S
al Peak Hour From 07 45 to 08 30
By Approac
File Name
RandyWillowAMPM05
Site Code Start Date
00000001
Page
2
11 30 2005
No
Randy From East
Lef Ped
ui
Suite 1 C
Oregon 97501
Rig
Thr
ht
App
Lef Ped t
From West i
Rig
Tot u
Randy
From South Thr
al
Lef
Ped
App Tot
ht
S
t
u
S
Rig
Thr
ht
u
al
Lef t
Ped
App
Int
Tot
Tota
al
1
s
Peak 1 of 1
07 45
07 45
07 45
07 45
h Volume Percent
7
0
74
0 0 9
High Int
07 45
Volume
1
0
20
25
27
0 0
1
10 76 9
2
0
13
0
0
0
0
8
0
9
Factor
3
0
0
5
4
0 0
3
20
7 7
12
0 0
08 30
Peak
0
15
8
5
7
0
5
0 75
0 65
0
0
0
3
0
14
31
JlJ Right
Left
J
Peds
L
i In
HI
r1 1 @
c
CIJ U I
I
fdl
on
J
2 Ic
il
i01
D
North I Unshifted
j
2
Il
J Ul
n I i I
I U
0 fn
J
17 35 0
1127
I
24
08 15
WillOW In
r
16 66
a
i
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street
Medford
Oregon
Suite 1 C 97501
File Name Site Code Start Date
Start
Rig
Time
ht
Thr
Lef
u
t
App
Ped s
al
i
By Approac
11 30 2005 3
Randy
Randy
From East
Tot
Peak Hour From 17 00 to
00000001
No
Page Willow From North
RandyWillowAMPM05
45 17
Rig
Thr
ht
From South
App
Lef Ped
Rig ht
Tot t
u
s
al
Thr
From West
Lef Ped
App Tot
t
u
S
al
Rig
Thr
ht
u
Lef t
Ped
App
Tota
al
1
s
Peak 1 of 1
17 00
17 00
17 00
17 00
h
Volume Percent
1 10
090
900
0 0
o
Highlnt Volume
10
0 0
o
17 15 o
15 75
4
0
20
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
5 0
4
o
4
0
0
0 0
0 0
6 85 7
17 15 o
0
20
7
0
0
8
0 62
0 62
Factor
5
5
0
0
101 l 11 1 1
I
Right 1
1
JlJ L Left
Peds
L
I I
i I
J I
L
L
J
I
rCO lot
North
T
I
01
1
I
1
Jnshifted l
i
H
L
5
o
r
sUI
3
35 0
In
g
7
4
WillOW
rr
1 14
17 00
Peak
n LJQ
I
CD I c
I
cn
I
J
l
l
I
J i
I
Int
Tot
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street
Medford
Groups From North
Start
Rig
Time
ht
Thr u
Lef t
Printed
Drager Street
From East
From South
Lef Ped t
s
S
File Name
OtisDragerAMPM05
Site Code Start Date
00000003
Page
1
11 22 2005
No
Unshifted
Otis Street
Ped
1 0
Oregon
Suite 1 C 97501
Otis Street From West
Ai Rhigt
Thr
10
10
10
10
0
u
aI
Lef Ped t
S
Ai al
Rig
Thr
ht
u
Lef Ped t
S
Factor
10
10
10
10
07 00
0
0
0
I
1 I
0
001
0
o
0
0
o
07 15
0
0
0
1
1 i
0
000
000
o
0
Oi
000
07 30
0
0
0
0
o i
0
201
300
1
1
i
o
07 45
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
100
1
1
1
0
o
0
1
I
050
1
Total
0
0
0
2
21
0
3
0
2
5
I
I
0
1
0
21
o
9
0
08 00
o
o
o
o
01
o
o
2
2
4
i
0
0
08 15
o
o
o
o
oi
o
o
o
o
08 30
o
o
o
o
1
o
2
08 45
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
1
2
Total
o
o
o
o
I 01
o
o
2
2
5
91
16 00
o
o
o
o
01
o
o
2
o
16 15
o
o
o
o
3
o
o
16 30
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
2
16 45
o
o
o
o
o
I
o
o
2
o
o
2
Total
o
o
o
o
01
o
6
2
2
10
17 00
o
o
o
o
01
o
1
o
1
17 15
o
o
o
o
o
2
1
o
17 30
o
o
o
o
01
o
1
1
17 45
o
o
o
o
01
o
1
Total
o
o
o
o
01
o
o
002
2
0
I
IO
10
10
i
I
10
10
10
Ai
T aI
1
10
100
I
3
3
3
4
300
3
7
6
8
4
13
22
1
o
1
I
o
3
o
3
6
o
o
1
I
o
1
o
8
10
o
01
91
o
o
1
o
1
2
i
5
9
o
o
1
1
o
2
o
o
2
i
5
2
0
I
o
31
o
7
o
12
fl
Tl
21
2
o
o
o
4
0
1
51
9
31
o
o
o
21 01
0
0
1
5
0
0
6
9
3
1
o
o
o
1
000
0
4
0
o
o
o
o
I
0 0
000
0
2
3
o
o
o
31
24
2
o
0
0
1
11
0
3
1
0
1
0
21
0
o
2
o
0
0
0
01
0
o
o
1
3
0
0
0
5
2
I
8
16
6
10
32
18
31
I
1
i
11
BREAK
Grand Total
Apprch Total
0 0
00
0 0
01
100
50 00
0
083 16
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 1
1 2
0 0
2 6
103
i
t
0 4
r
tt
0 31 6 O
14
10
0
3
1
714
0 0
214
1 7
0 0
3 1
3
i
il
0
o
0
0
1
o
1
2
2
o
1
3
1
O
4
o
2
6
29
0
19
49
59 2 0
10 33 0
o
10
4 14
I
38 0 0 8
29
19 00
9
I
7 5
2
2 10
3
50 5 6
I
20
97
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street Suite 1 C
Medford
Otis Street From East
From North Start
Rig
Time
ht
Thr
Lef
u
t
Oregon 97501
App
Ped
Tot
Rig ht
al Peak Hour From 07 45 to 08 30
File Name
OtisDragerAMPM05
Site Code Start Date
00000003
Page No
2
11 22 2005
Drager
Street From South
Thr
Lef
Ped
u
t
s
App
Rig
Tot
ht
al
Thr
Lef 1
u
Ped
Otis Street From West
App Tot
s
al
Rig
Thr
ht
u
Lef t
Ped
App
Tota
al
I
s
Peak I of 1
By
Approac
07 45
07 45
07 45
07 45
h
Volume
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 25
Percent
0 0 0
High
Int
2 25 0
4
8
2
50
0
1
0
0
3
7
0 0
0
2
2
4
1
0 50
Factor
10
0
43
0 0
3
5
08 15 0
0
0
1
0
0
1o
I
01
110
E
lJ1 W
00
II
North
l
c
1
iDiiSfUftEid
J
I
I
a
oi
O II
lII
g iA
J L
Left
Right
JT
Peds
2T 3 n
Draoer Street
9
9
I
lrr
8
0 63
I
1
23
0 0
0 75
0
13 56
5
07 45
Peak
0
33 0 0
08 00
Volume
0
66
i
5
n
ii
Int
Tot
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street Suite 1 C Medford Oregon 97501
Otis Street From East
From North Start
Rig
Thr
Time
ht
u
App
Lef Ped
Tot t
5
Thr
Ri h
t
By Approac
Page
3
00000003 11 22 2005
No
Street From South
App
Rig
Tot U
OtisDragerAMPM05
Drager
Lef Ped
aL Peak Hour From 17 00 to 17 45
File Name Site Code Start Date
Thr
al
Ped
App Tot
ht
5
Lef
Otis Street From West
t
u
5
Rig
Thr
ht
u
al
Lef Ped t
App
Tota
al
I
5
Peak 1 of 1
17 00
17 00
17 00
17 00
h
Volume
0
0
0
0
0
Percent
0 0 0
5 62 5
High Int
17 15
Volume
0
2 25 0
1
8
4
12
0
66 0 0
5
7
1
1
16
16
7
6
0
3
3
4
0
66
0 0
7
0 0
7
17 45 2
0
2
6
33 3
17 30 0
0
0
3
0
2
0
3
Peak
0 66
0 50
0 50
Factor
7
0
0
J I
I
co
sFl 1
iJi
i
I North I
olh r
m
1I 1
I I I
I tN1 y
i
i
I
U
Co n loi
Left
Peds 1
Right
L
L
6
lii n er
l
I
J
i
in
I
lo i
g iil CD
lnt
Tot
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street Suite 1 C
Medford
Groups Printed Unshifted Randy
Laurel From North Start
Rig
Time
ht
Thr u
From East
Lef Ped t
Oregon 97501
App
Rig
Tot
ht
s
al Factor
1 0
10
10
10
07 00
0
10
o
2
07 15
0
13
o
0
07 30
0
11
o
07 45
0
15
Total
0
08 00 08 15
Thr u
Lef Ped
File Name
LaurelRandyAMPM05
Site Code Start Date
00000001
Page
1
No
Laurel
Randy
From South
From West
Thr
Lef Ped
App Tot
t
11 29 2005
u
t
Rig
Thr
ht
u
10
10
s
al 10
10
12 i
o
0
0
131
o
0
1
0
111
o
0
1
0
16
o
0
49
1
2
521
o
0
o
8
o
8
161
0
o
3
o
o
11
6
1
18
2
1
13
2
08 30
o
10
1
2
13
1
3
15
3
22
08 45
1
5
o
0
6
0
2
3
o
Total
I
34
7
11
531
3
6
34
5
91
0
o
3
2
o
2
1
1
3
1
0
o
o
1
0
I
8
5
i
Lef Ped t
S
10
10
App
Int
Tot
Tota
al
J
10
10
10
10
o
5
o
0
5
5
0
o
o
5
22
2
7
1
0
10
5
0
o
1
6
30
oi
1
9
o
0
10
6
0
1
o
71
28
I
5
6
2
0
13
I
4
2
o
2
8
8
27
3
0
381
20
2
1
3
26
i
3
11
4
3
1
191
4
o
o
8
12
I
18
48
6
1
o
551
2
4
o
16
22
7
1
o
361
i
28
5
3
o
0
8
I
79
5710
o
o
17
Ls
o
o
O
1
J 27
I
19
7
o
24
50
I
278
I
48
I
i
94
27
5
51
2
10
2
1
15
3
o
o
2
3
I d
1
8
6
o
15
2
1
1
o
5
5
8
3
1
17
3
o
o
o
0
6
5
1
12
0
o
o
1
8
32
16
3
s9T
8
I
I
3
i
43 123
50 113
BREAK
16 00
o
8
o
1
16 15
o
7
1
2
16 30
1
6
o
1
16 45
o
8
o
o
8
Total
I
29
I
4
35
17 00
o
7
o
1
8
o
2
1
o
17 15
o
4
o
o
4
o
o
o
o
17 30
o
8
1
o
9
o
1
1
o
17 45
1
4
o
o
5
1
o
2
1
41I
2
Total
I
23
I
1
26
I
3
4
I
91
4
44
20
6
3
135
10
18
166
4
10
51
13
114
130
44
10
6 0
10S
38
43
14
Grand
Total
Apprch
1 8
81 3
Total
I
7
1 5
2 8
r
12
65
14
31
1
I
1
20
7
1
o
11
4
1
78
16
932
462
5 1 3
I 25 5
0 6
15 i
7
o
o
o
1
o
o
2
161
6
o
o
1
7
3
o
o
o
3
17
o
o
3
20
64
10
2
33
109
587
9 2
18
303
9 8
5 1
3 0
5 1
14 I 74
i
298
5 1
7 8
2 0
6
17
20
5
0
12 0
8 6 8
5 1
45 8
33
JHl
29
34 847
20 0 5
I
I 3
I
16 7
i
34
I
L 129
651
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street Suite 1 C Medford Oregon 97501 File Name Site Code Start Date
Page
Rig
Laurel
Randy
From North
From East
Thr
Lef
u
t
ht
App
Ped
Tot
j
s
By Approac
al
i
Peak Hour From 07 45 to 08 30
Rig
Thr
ht
u
Lef
Ped
App
Rig
Tot
Thr
ht j
s
ai
Lef
Randy From West
Ped
App Tot
uj
t
07 45
Percent
High
Int
Volume
0 0
44
8
11
698 127
17
63
3 1 6
ai
4
36 73
8 2
6
49
92
12
6
18
Peak
1
t
u
7
123
8
5 7
7
15
3
22
15
9
30
0 8
0
18 0 0
0
26
0
0
6
0
55
2
4
0
0 55
0 56
5
7
9
8
In
L 631 o
44 1
Thru
Right
J
Left
I
Peds
4
0
iJ
i
i
U
I
s1
YjChiW
j North
J
I
I I I
1
c
LJ
Ilt
b i
CO
22
0 55
aure
0
16
0 87
Factor
10 1
50
52
08 15
48
ronsfii
i
I
1
r
iol
15 I
rn
iial
0
f mi
Left
Thru 7
Right
23
Peds 2
r
m Tn La
rei
J c
J
I
Int
1
n
1
Tota
s
al
18
08 15 3
App
45 07
23
74
08 30 11
Lef Ped
Tot
ht
s
07 45
2
08 15 0
Thr
Rig
Peak I of I
07 45
0
1129 2005 2
No
h Volume
00000001
Laurel From South
i
i
LaurelRandyAMPM05
i
i@J
i
I
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street
Medford
Suite 1 C
Oregon 97501
File Name Site Code
LaurelRandyAMPM05 00000001
Start Date
Page
Start
Rig
Time
ht
Laurel
Randy
From North
From East
App Tot u
aI Peak Hour From 17 00 to 1
By Approac
45
11 29 2005
No
3
Laurel From South
Rig
Thr
Lef
Ped
ht
u
t
S
App
Lef
Tot
Randy From West
Ped
App Tot
u
al
t
S
Rig
Thr
ht
u
Lef Ped t
al
S
Int
App Tot
Tota
al
I
Peak 1 of 1
17 00
17 00
17 00
17 00
h 23
Volume Percent
High
Int
Volume
3 8
26
885
3 8
3 8
3
4
1
33
44
11
1
17 30 0
1 ll
3
4
9
4 4 5
1
8
o
9 0
1
6
74
0
2
4
1
8 1
0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
20
7
29
7
0
8
In
i
I l 23cfill l
Left
Thru
Right
J
Peds
4
1
t
OW1ii
t
I North
0
01 eN e
2
l
I
i1 2
Q
J
DiiSfiIfted
LJ
1
l I
sHli I
C
MlcIJ i
O
10
to
Left
Thru
Right
20
Peds
rT 74 in laurel
l r
I
0
0
7 0 7
Laure
r
20
0
0 63
3
J
3 15
17 00
0 56
21
17 85
17 15
721
Factor
20 27
5
17 45
Peak
44 59
I
I
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street Suite 1 C Medford Oregon 97501
Groups Laurel From North Start
Rig
Thr
Time
ht
u
s
1 i
Rig ht
al Factor
10
10
10
10
Thr
Lef
u
t
LaurelOtisAMPM05
Site Code Start Date
00000001
Page
1
No
Laurel From South
Ped s
Ai
Rig
Thr
ht
u
al 10
10
10
10
11 29 2005
Unshifted
From East
Lef Ped t
Printed
File Name
Otis From West
Lef Ped t
S
Ai
Rig
Thr
Lef
Ped
ht
u
t
S
al 10
10
10
10
Ai
T al
10
07 00
o
15
0
o
15
0
0
o
0
0
0
5
o
o
5
07 15
o
18
0
o
18
0
0
o
0
0
0
10
o
o
10
I
10
I
10
I
10
000
0
0
I
21
0
0
o
28
3
i 61
30
07 30
1
16
0
o
17 I
0
0
o
0
01
0
9
1
o
10
0
1
0
I
23
0
o
0
0
o
0
01
0
13
o
o
0
2
0
2
72
0
o
0
0
o
0
o
I
0
37
1
o
131 38 I
4
Total
241 741
I
2
07 45
7
0
3
0
08 00
1
14
o
o
15
I
o
o
o
o
01
o
17
1
o
o
o
26
181
3
08 15
o
o
o
o
o
oi
o
55
o
o
55
o
o
30
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
35
1
o
1
o
o
0
I
08 45
o
15
01I
I 361
I
08 30
o
o
261151
o
o
o
o
o
01
o
17
o
o
3
o
o
Total
1
85
o
o
861
o
o
o
o
O
o
2
o
171 l26I
8
o
I
0
91
16 00
1
14
o
o
15
I
o
o
o
o
o i
0
14
I
0
15
6
0
0
0
16 15
11
o
o
o
o
61
36
1
o
o
o
15
2
0
17
4
0
1
0
5
o
12
o
o
o
o
o
o
o i
i
34
16 30
1
0 0
16
1
0
17
1
0
0
0
16 45
o
8
o
o
81
o
o
o
o
o
Total
2
45
o
o
47
i
o
o
o
o
01
0
16
30
124
43
lOjrn
I 67
L 221
BREAK
121 12
L 56
5
0
i
I
30 0
ht
611
11
0
I
0
131
0 2
o
o
o
o
o
o
2
12
120
17 00
1
15
o
o
i
0
o
o
o
01
o
13
o
o
17 15
1
5
o
o
61
0
o
o
o
01
28
2
o
30
17 30
1
15
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
15
1
o
16
o
o
o
17 45
o
9
161
01
o
o
o
91
0
o
o
o
01
o
12
1
o
13 1
3
o
1
o
26
Total
3
44
41
o
o
471
0
o
o
o
01
o
68
4
07ii7
o
I
o
81
12i
0
285
12
0
0
6
0
39
0 0
6 6
Grand Total
Apprch
8
246
o
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
I
96 3 1 9
Total
254
i
O
41 1 4 7
1 43
0 0
0 0
9
48
4
O
2 0
0 0
297
I
33 8
3 50
5 6
O
0 0
01
I
1 O
10
29
590
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street Suite 1 C Medford Oregon 97501
File Name
LaurelOtisAMPM05
Site Code Start Date
00000001
Page
No
Laurel
Otis From West
From North Start
Rig
Time
ht
A
Thr
Lef
Ped
u
t
S
Rig al
Peak Hour From 07 45 to 08 30
By Approac
11 29 2005 2
Thr
ht
u
Rig
Thr
ht
u
Lef t
Ped S
App
Tota
aI
I
Peak 1 of 1
07 45
07 45
07 45
07 45
h
Volume Percent
High
Int
Volume
2 2 1
0
93
979
0 0
30
0
0
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
2
0
122
98 16
4
08 30 0
120
0 0
30
Peak
0 0
55
0
5
In L
21
93T Thru
Right
J
L Peds
1
I
J i
I
PO
1
North
m
v
l
I
M jO
0
55
2
Laurel
E1EI
0
0 55
1
iOiiStu
J
In
Q a
Left
Thru
2L J 2Q i
3
25 0
0
12
0 0
07 45
0
0 79
Factor
0
0
08 15 o
9 75
Peds cf
rZ2 1i1 Laurel
r
j
01
4
0
2
0
Int
Tot
6 0 50
01
JRH
Transportation Engineering
1175 East Main Street Suite 1 C
Medford
Laurel From North
Start
Rig
Time
ht
Thr
Peak Hour From 17 00
By Approac
App Tot
t
s
u I
to
97501
45 17
al
00000001
Page
3
Lef
Ped
t
s
App Tot aI
Rig
Thr
ht
u
Lef
17 00
Ped
App
s
al
17 00
Percent
3 4 6
44
6
High
lnt
Volume
0
0
0 0
0 0
47
0
0
0
0
0
68
4
0
72
94
0 0
4
17 00 1
0
93
15
0
0
16
0
4
Laurel
In
1 Right
J
Thru
9J Peds
I
i
I
i
il
Xl
5
M
North
l1 nshifted
J
Un
Left 4
Thru
6J
Lef Ped
u
t
s
lnt
App Tot
Tota
al
1
5 6
7
0
0 0
5
0 0
1
0
8
12 5
0 0
17 45 28
0 73
Factor
ht
Thr
87
17 15
Peak
Rig
17 00
h
Volume
11 29 2005
Otis From West
Tot
ti
LaurelOtisAMPM05
No
i
Peak 1 of 1
17 00
File Name Site Code Start Date
Laurel From South
From East
Lef Ped
ui i
Oregon
Peds
Q
72 In rei
rfou
2
0
30
3
0
0
4
0 60
0 50 i
0
01
I
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
APPENDIX III TUBE COUNT DATA
4
1
1 1I Q
J Q
It
e CO
we
It o
It
I
c
I Nm C
w N
0 Q
S It
e
It
S
0 Q
Wo
W
It o
I
Q
I i C o
w
Q J I
o
I iM C
a w a
0
0
tIJ o as
ti E
E as
2 w r0 11 C asl
cO
0
Q C
tIJ c Q Q
asO E Q
r1
OO
oo
mlt oo mOO
1t
2
NCO N mIt M MMOO
OO oo
2 1
M
2 I
lt m
I
lt m
1
NMm
NIt
I
It N
m m M
It
m M
OO
I
o
as
M
ooc
OOm 0
2 2
It m
N
OO It NMN
O
OOOOM
It
OOOOONMOO
1
NM
f
NNIt
N
2 J
N
OOOO
O
2 E
a
IN
N
o
I
OOMNOOOOO
I
J
tbcbr COc
co
a a a
2E
OOIt
It MNN
lt m
a a a
2
mm
N OO NNMN
N
1t 1t
N
NcJ
aa INM
r
as J
2
3
c as
a
II
o
Q C
e o
I W W
IX I tIJ
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
APPENDIX IV EXISTING YEAR 2005 SYNCHRO OUTPUT
103
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
8 Otis Street
laurel Street
1 4 2006
t Movement
EBL
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
Grade Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor
Hourly
flow rate
vph
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
V
t
Stop
Free
0
0
0
SBR
Free
3
10
2
133
103
2
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
4
14
3
193
149
3
349
151
152
349
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed fts Percent Blockage Right turn flare veh Median type Median storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting
vC 1 vC2
stage stage
None
volume
1 conf vol 2 conf vol
vCu unblocked vol tC tC
single s 2 stage 5
tF
s
pO
queue free
cM
capacity
veh h
Direction Lane Volume Total Volume Left Volume
Right
cSH Volume to
Capacity Length 95th Control Delay s Queue
ft
Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS
s
151
152
4 6
62
4 1
3 5
3 3
22
99
98
100
647
896
1429
EB 1
NB 1
SB1
19
196
152
4
3
0
14
0
3
823
1429
1700
0 02
0 00
0 09
2
0
0
95
0 1
00
A
A
95
0 1
00
A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Analysis Period min
Helman JRH
0 6 Utilization
Springs Homes AM Existing Transportation Engineering
18 6
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2005
Synchro
f
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Drager Street
12 Otis Street
of Movement
EBT
lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
EBR
WBl
Free
Grade
0
Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
1 4 2006
It
WBr
NBl
4
V
Free
Stop
0
0
11
0
2
2
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
14
0
3
3
NBR
1 0 77
2 0 77
1
3
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed Percent
Right
ftIs
Blockage
turn flare veh
Median type
None
Median
storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC conflicting volume vC1 stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf vol vCu unblocked vol tC tC
single s 2 stage s
tF
s
pO
queue free
cM
capacity
veh h
Direction lane
14
22
14
22
14
4 1
4 6
62
2 2
3 5
3 3
100
100
100
1604
993
1066
EB 1
WB1
NB 1
14
5
4
Volume Left
0
3
1
Volume
0
0
3
1700
1604
1040
0 01
0 00
0 00
0
0
0
00
3 6
8 5
A
A
00
36
8 5
Volume Total
Right
cSH Volume to
Capacity
Queue Length 95th ft Control
Delay
s
Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
s
Analysis
Helman JRH
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection
14
Capacity Utilization
Period min
Springs Homes AM Existing Transportation Engineering
2 2 13 3
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2005
Synchro
I
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6 Randy Street Willow Street
1 4 2006
to
Movement
EBL
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor flow rate
WBT
WBR
f
Grade
Hourly
EBT
vph
SBL
SBR
V
Free
Free
0
0
Stop 0
3
6
2
11
22
8
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
5
10
3
18
35
13
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftls Percent Blockage Right turn flare veh Median type Median storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC conflicting volume vC 1 stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf vol vCu unblocked vol tC tC
single s 2 stage s
tF
s
None
21
31
21
31
12
12
4 1
4 6
62 3 3
2 2
3 5
pO queue free cM capacity veh h
100
96
99
1595
979
1068
Direction Lane
EB1
WB1
SB 1
15
21
48
Volume Left
5
0
35
Volume Right
0
18
13
1595
1700
1002
0 00
0 01
0 05
0
0
4
4 2
00
88
00
88
Volume Total
cSH Volume to
Capacity Length 95th Control Delay s Queue
ft
Lane LOS
A
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
24
s
A
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection
Analysis
Helman JRH
55
Capacity
Period
Utilization
min
Springs Homes AM Existing Transportation Engineering
13 3
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2005
Synchro
ft
6
Report Page 1
HeM 3
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Randy Street
Laurel Street
1 5 2006
J Movement Lane
EBL
Configurations
Control Volume vph Peak Hour Factor
Hourly
flow rate
EBT
EBR
WBL
4 Stop
Sign
vph
SBR
4 Stop
40
4
3
8
26
102
9
49
0 63
0
063
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
27
63
0 63
6
5
13
41
162
14
78
0
16
75
216
92
0
63
13
14
Volume
27
5
162
0 34
0 17
40 0
0 0 07
43
48
3 9
45
0 05
0 10
0 23
0 11
764
699
893
767
75
83
8 1
80
75
83
8 1
80
A
A
A
A
Summary
Delay
8 0
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period min
JRH
SBT
17
43
Helman
SBL
4 Stop
0 63
Volume Total vph Volume Left vph
Intersection
NBR
10
SB 1
Approach LOS
NBT
0 63
NB 1
s
NBL
0
WB1
Hadj s Departure Headway Degree Utilization x Capacity veh h Control Delay s Approach Delay s
WBR
4 Stop
EB 1
Right vph
WBT
0 63 0
Direction Lane
t
f
A 24 9
Springs Homes AM Existing Yr Transportation Engineering
ICU Level of Service
A
15
2005
Synchro
7
6
Report Page 1
HCM 8
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Otis Street
Laurel Street
1 4 2006
I
t Movement
EBL
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
Grade Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor
Hourly
flow rate
vph
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
V
1
1
Stop
Free
Free
0
0
0
SBR
1
8
4
75
49
3
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
1
10
5
89
58
4
60
62
Pedestrians Lane Width ft ftIs
Walking Speed Percent
Right
Blockage
turn flare veh
Median
type storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked
None
Median
vC
conflicting
vC1 vC2
stage stage
159
volume
1 conf vol 2 conf vol
vCu unblocked vol tC tC
single s 2 stage s
tF
s
pO
queue free
cM
capacity
vehlh
Direction Lane Volume Total Volume Left Volume
Right
cSH Volume to Capacity Queue
Length Control Delay
95th ft s
Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
s
Helman
60
62
4 6
62
4 1
3 5
3 3
22
100
99
100
830
1005
1541
EB 1
NB 1
SB1
11
94
62
1
5
0
10
0
4
982
1541
1700
0 01
0 00
0 04
1
0
0
87
4 0
00
A
A
8 7
4 0
00
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Analysis Period min
JRH
159
0 8 Utilization
Springs Homes PM Existing Transportation Engineering
17 2
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2005
Synchro
6 Report
Page
I
1
HeM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Drager Street
12 Otis Street
Movement Lane
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
1 4 2006
NBL
Configurations
1
1
V
Control Grade Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate vph Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Free
Free
Stop
0
0
Sign
0 4 0 71 6
0 0 71
2 0 71
0
3
6 0 71 8
NBR
1
4
0 71
0 71
1
6
Walking Speed ftls Percent Blockage Right
turn flare veh
Median
type storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked
None
Median
vC
conflicting volume
vC 1
stage 1 conf vol stage 2 conf vol
vC2
6
vCu unblocked vol tC
single
s
tC
2
tF
s
pO
queue free
cM
capacity
stage
Direction
6
20
6
64
62
3 3
s
veh h
lane
22
35
100
100
99
1615
996
1077
EB 1
WB1
NB 1
6
11
7
Volume Left
0
3
1
Volume
0
0
6
1700
1615
1060
0 00
0 00
0 01
0
0
00
1 8 A
A
00
1 8
4 8
Right
cSH
Capacity
Queue Length 95th ft Control Delay s Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
s
Intersection
Helman JRH
1 4 8
A
Summary
Average Delay Analysis
6
41
Volume Total
Volume to
20
3 3
Capacity Utilization
Period
min
Springs Homes PM Existing Transportation Engineering
13 3
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2005
Synchro
I
It
i
6
Report Page 1
HCM 6
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Randy Street Willow Street
J Movement lane
I
EBl
EBT
Configurations
WBT
WBR
SBl
4
Sign Control Grade Volume veh h
7
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate vph
1 4 2006
SBR
V
Free
Free
0
0 0
Stop 0
4
0 71
0 71
0 71
10
0
6
17
10
1
0 71
0 71
0 71
14
1
24
Pedestrians lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftIs Percent Blockage Right turn flare veh Median type Median storage veh
None
Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting
vC 1 vC2
stage stage
volume
37
30
37
18
4 6
62
18
2 conf vol
vCu unblocked vol tC
30
1 conf vol
single s 2 stage s
4 1
tF
s
22
3 5
33
pO
queue free
99
99
100
cM
capacity
1583
969
1061
tC
veh h
Direction Lane Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right
EB1
WB1
SB1
10
30
15
10
0
14
0
24
1
cSH
1583
1700
977
Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th ft Control Delay s
0 01
0 02
0 02
0
0
1
73
00
8 7
00
87
lane LOS
A
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
Helman JRH
A
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Analysis
73
s
3 8
Utilization
Period min
Springs Homes PM Existing Transportation Engineering
15 8
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2005
Synchro
H l
6
Report Page 1
HCM 3
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Randy Street
Laurel Street
1 5 2006 4
Movement Lane
EBL
Configurations
Control Volume vph Peak Hour Factor flow rate
vph
Direction Lane Volume Total vph Volume Left vph Volume Right vph
Hadj
s
Departure Headway Degree Utilization x Capacity veh h Control Delay s Approach Delay s Approach LOS Intersection
EBR
s
WBR
NBL
4 Stop
NBT
NBR
SBL
4 Stop
SBT
0
19
4
3
1
22
49
4
0 90
1
26
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
4
3
24
54
4
1
29
0
0
21
EB 1
WB1
NB1
SB1
21
9
83
31
0
4
24
1
21
1
4
1
D 57
0 06
0 06
0 02
36
40
4 1
0 02
0 01
2 4
0 09
0 04
967
825
870
873
67
73
75
7 2
67
73
75
72
A
A
A
A
1
SBR
4 Stop
0
1 0 90 1
Summary 73
HCM Level of Service
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period min
Helman
WBT
t
0 90
Delay
JRH
WBL
4 Stop
Sign
Hourly
EBT
Springs Homes PM Existing Yr Transportation Engineering
A 2 21
ICU Level of Service
A
15
2005
Synchro
1
6
Report Page 1
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
APPENDIX V YEAR 2006 NO BUILD SYNCHRO OUTPUT
i
1
I
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
8 Otis Street
1 4 2006
Laurel Street
I
t EBL
Movement Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
Grade Volume vehlh Peak Hour Factor
Hourly
flow rate
vph
NBT
NBL
EBR
SBT
V
4
Stop
Free
0
0
0
SBR
Free
3
10
2
135
105
2
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
4
14
3
196
152
3
355
154
155
355
154
155
4 6
62
41
3 5
33
22
99
98
100
642
892
1425
EB1
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftls Percent Blockage Right turn flare veh Median type Median storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC conflicting volume vC 1 stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf vol
None
vCu unblocked vol tC
single stage
tC 2 tF
5 5
5
pO queue free cM capacity vehlh Direction Lane Volume Total Volume Left Volume
Right
cSH Volume to
Capacity Queue Length 95th Control Delay s
ft
SB 1
199
155
4
3
0
14
0
3
819
1425
1700
0 02
0 00
0 09
2
0
95
Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS
NB 1
19
s
01
A
A
95
01
0 00 00
A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Analysis Period min
Helman JRH
05 Utilization
Springs Homes AM No Transportation Engineering
18 7
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Synchro
Build Yr 2006
II
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12 Otis Street Drager Street
Movement Lane
EBT
Grade Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor
Hourly
flow rate
vph
WBt
WBT
NBL
1
1
V
Free
Free
Stop
0
0
0
Configurations
Sign Control
EBR
1 4 2006
NBR
11
0
2
2
1
2
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
14
0
3
3
1
3
Pedestrians Lane Width ft ftIs
Walking Speed
Percent Blockage
Right
turn flare veh
Median
type storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC conflicting volume vC 1 stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf vol
None
Median
vCu unblocked vol tC tC
single s 2 stage s
tF
s
pO
queue free
cM
capacity
veh h
Direction Lane
14
22
14
22
14
4 1
4 6
62
22
3 5
3 3
100
100
100
1604
993
1066
EB 1
WB1
NB1
14
5
4
Volume Left
0
3
1
Volume
0
0
3
1700
1604
1040
0 01
0 00
0 00
0
0
0
00
3 6
8 5
A
A
00
36
85
Volume Total
Right
cSH Volume to Capacity Queue
Length
Control
Delay
95th
ft
s
Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS
s
A
Intersection Summary Average Delay Intersection
Analysis
Helman JRH
Capacity
14
Utilization
Period min
Springs Homes AM No Transportation Engineering
22 13 3
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Build Yr 2006
Synchro I
4
I
6
Report Page 1
HCM 6
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Randy Street Willow Street
Movement Lane
EBl
Configurations
Sign Control Grade Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
EST
WBT
WBR
SBl
4
1
V
Free
Free
Stop
0
0
1 4 2006
SBR
0
3
6
2
11
22
8
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
5
10
3
18
35
13
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftIs Percent Blockage Right turn flare veh Median type
None
Median
storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting
21
31
vCu unblocked vol
21
31
12
tC
41
6 4
62
33
vC1
stage vC2 stage
tC
volume
2 cont vol
single s 2 stage s
tF
s
pO
queue tree
cM
capacity
veh h
Direction Lane
22
3 5
100
96
99
1595
979
1068
EB1
WB1
SS1
Volume Total Volume Left
15
21
48
5
0
Volume Right
0
18
13
1595
1700
1002
0 00
0 01
0 05
0
0
4
4 2
00
8 8
00
8 8
cSH Volume to Capacity Queue
Length 95th
Control Delay Lane LOS
Intersection
ft
s
Approach Delay Approach LOS
Intersection
35
A 24
s
A
A
Summary
Average Delay
5 5
Capacity
Analysis
Period min
Helman
Springs
JRH
12
1 cont vol
Utilization
Homes
13 3
ICU Level ot Service
A
15
AM No Build Yr 2006
Transportation Engineering
Synchro
6
Report Page 1
HCM 3
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Randy Street
Laurel Street
1 5 2006
t Movement Lane
EBl
EBT
Configurations
EBR
WBl
t Stop
Control Volume vph
Sign
WBT
WBR
NBl
t
NBT
NBR
SBl
t
Stop
SBT
SBR
t
Stop
Stop
0
10
17
40
4
3
8
26
103
9
49
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0
16
27
63
6
5
13
41
163
14
78
0
EB 1
WB1
NB 1
SB 1
Volume Total vph Volume Left vph
43
75
217
92
0
63
13
14
Volume
27
5
163
0
0 34
0 17
0 41
0 07
6
Report Page 1
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
Direction Lane
Hadj
Right vph
s
Departure Headway
s
Degree Utilization x Capacity veh h Control Delay s Approach Delay s Approach
lOS
43
48
3 9
0 05
0 10
0 23
0 11
763
699
894
767
75
8 3
8 1
80
75
83
8 1
80
A
A
A
A
0 06
45
Intersection Summary
Delay
8 0
HCM level of Service
Intersection
Analysis
Helman JRH
Capacity
Period
A
Utilization
min
Springs Homes AM No Transportation Engineering
25 0
ICU level of Service
A
15
Build Yr 2006
Synchro
rf 0
HeM 8
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Otis Street
Laurel Street
1 4 2006
t Movement Lane
EBL
Configurations
Sign Control Grade Volume vehlh Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
EBR
NBT
SBT
V
4
1
Stop
Free
Free
0
0
0
NBL
SBR
1
8
4
76
49
3
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
10
5
90
58
4
60
62
1
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftIs Percent Blockage Right turn flare veh Median type Median storage veh
None
Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting volume
vC 1 vC2
stage stage
2 cont vol
vCu unblocked vol tC tC tF
pO cM
160
1 cont vol
single s 2 stage s s
queue free
capacity
veh h
Direction lane Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH
Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th ft Control Delay s Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
s
160
60
62
4 6
62
41
3 5
3 3
2 2
100
99
100
828
1005
1541
EB1
NB 1
SB1
11
95
62
1
5
0
10
0
4
982
1541
1700
0 01
0 00
0 04
1
0
0
8 7
4 0
00
A
A
87
4 0
Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period min
Helman JRH
00
A
Springs Homes PM No Transportation Engineering
0 8 17 3
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Build Yr 2006
Synchro
Lf I
7
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
12 Otis Street
Drager Street
1 4 2006 of
t Movement
EBT
EBR
WBT
NBt
1
Control Grade Volume vehlh
4
V
Free
Free
Stop
0
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
0 71
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Hourly flow
rate
4
vph
WBt
0
6
2
6
1
0 71
0 71
0 71
0 71
0
3
8
1
NBR
4 0 71 6
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftls Percent Blockage Right
turn flare veh
Median type
None
Median storage veh
Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting volume
vC 1 vC2
stage stage
6
20
6
20
6
41
4 6
62
3 3
2 conf vol
vCu unblocked vol tC tC
6
1 conf vol
single s 2 stage s
tF
s
pO
queue free
eM
capacity
veh h
Direction Lane
EB1
2 2
35
100
100
99
1615
996
1077
WB1
NB1
6
11
7
0
3
1
0
0
6
cSH
1700
1615
1060
Volume to Capacity
0 00
0 00
0 01
0
0
00
1 8 A
A
00
1 8
4 8
Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right
Queue Length 95th ft Control Delay s Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS
s
1 4 8
A
Intersection
Summary Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period
Helman JRH
min
Springs Homes PM No Transportation Engineering
3 3 13 3
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Build Yr 2006
Synchro
4
6
Report Page 1
HCM 6
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Randy Street
Willow Street
1 4 2006
J Movement Lane
EBL
EBT
Configurations
Sign Control Grade Volume veh h
7
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
WBT
f
WBR
1
Free
Free
0
0 0
SBL
SBR
V Stop 0
4
17
10
1
0 71
0 71
0 71
14
1
0 71
0 71
0 71
10
0
6
24
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftls Percent Blockage Right
turn flare veh
Median type
None
Median
storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting volume
vC 1 vC2
2 conf vol vCu unblocked vol tC single s tC 2 stage tF
pO cM
37
18
30
37
18
41
4 6
62
22
3 5
3 3
99
99
100
1583
969
s
s
queue free
capacity
veh h
Direction
Lane
Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to
30
1 conf vol
stage stage
Capacity
Queue Length 95th ft Control Delay s Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS
EB 1
WB1
SB 1
10
30
15
10
0
14
0
24
1
1583
1700
977
0 01
0 02
0 02
0
0
1
73
00
8 7
00
87
A s
73
1061
A
A
Intersection
Summary Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
Helman JRH
Period min
Springs Homes PM No Transportation Engineering
3 8 15 8
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Build Yr 2006
Synchro
j
6
Report Page 1
HCM 3
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Randy Street
Laurel Street
Movement Lane
EBL
EBT
1 5 2006
EBR
WBL
WBT
NBL
I
NBT
NBR
SBL
1
Configurations
Sign Control Volume vph Peak Hour Factor
Stop
Stop
0
0
19
4
3
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0
0
21
4
3
Direction Lane Volume Total vph Volume Left vph Volume Right vph
EB 1
WB1
NB1
SB 1
21
9
83
31
0
4
24
1
21
1
4
1
Hadj s Departure Headway Degree Utilization x Capacity veh h Control Delay s Approach Delay s
0 57
0 06
0 06
0 02
Hourly
flow rate
Approach
vph
s
LOS
Intersection
3 6
40
4 1
0 02
0 01
0 09
0 04
967
825
870
873
67
73
75
72
67
73
75
7 2
A
A
A
A
42
Stop
22
49
4
0 90
0 90
0 90
24
54
4
0 90 1
SBR
0 90 1
26
1
0 90
0 90
29
1
73
HCM Level of Service
Intersection
Analysis
Helman
Stop 1
SBT
Summary
Delay
JRH
WBR
t
Capacity
A
Utilization
Period min
Springs
Homes
21 2
ICU Level of Service
A
15
PM No Build Yr 2006
Synchro
Transportation Engineering
6 Report
Page I I 1
c l
1
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
APPENDIX VI YEAR 2006 BUILD SYNCHRO OUTPUT
I
l
I
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
12 Otis Street
Drager Street
1 4 2006
J Movement
t
EBL
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
Grade
Volume veh h flow rate
vph
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
Free
Free
Stop
0
0
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly
EBT
11
r NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Stop 0
0
2
2
1
1
0
2
4
0
0
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0 77
0
14
0
3
3
1
1
0
3
5
0
0
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed
ftls
Percent Blockage
Right
turn flare veh
Median
type
None
None
Median storage veh
Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting volume
vC1 vC2
stage stage
4
tC tF
single 5 2 stage 5 5
queue free cM capacity veh h
pO
Lane
Direction
23
3
14
23
23
14
25
23
3
71
65
62
7 1
6 5
62
22
22
3 5
40
3 3
3 5
40
3 3
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
100
1618
1604
988
869
1066
982
869
1081
WB1
NB1
SB1
4
5
Volume Left
0
3
1
5
Volume
0
1
3
0
cSH
1618
1604
1038
982
Volume to Capacity
0 00
0 00
0 00
0 01
0
0
0
0
00
2 9
85
87
A
A
A
00
29
85
87
A
A
Right
Queue Length 95th ft
Delay
s
Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
s
Summary
Average Delay Intersection
Helman
25
41
6
JRH
14
4
14
Analysis
23
4 1
EB 1
Volume Total
Control
23
2 conf vol
vCu unblocked vol tC
14
1 conf vol
Capacity
3 2 Utilization
13 3
Period min
Springs Homes AM Build Transportation Engineering
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2006
Synchro
j
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
8 Otis Street
Laurel Street
1 4 2006
t Movement
EBL
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
Grade
EBR
NBL
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
SBT
V
1
1
Stop
Free
Free
0
Volume veh h
NBT
SBR
0
0
4
13
3
135
108
3
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
0 69
6
19
4
196
157
4
363
159
161
363
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftIs Percent Blockage Right
turn flare veh
Median
type storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked
None
Median
vC
conflicting
vC 1 vC2
stage stage
volume
1 cont vol 2 cont vol
vCu unblocked vol tC tC
single s 2 stage s
tF
s
queue tree cM capacity veh h
pO
Direction Lane Volume Total Volume Left Volume
Right
cSH Volume to
Capacity
Queue Length 95th ft Control
Delay
s
Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
s
159
161
4 6
62
41
3 5
3 3
22
99
98
100
634
887
1418
EB1
NB1
SB1
25
200
161
6
4
0
19
0
4
811
1418
1700
0 03
0 00
0 09
2
0
0
96
02
00
A
A
96
2 0
Summary 07
Average Delay Intersection
Analysis
Helman JRH
00
A
Capacity Utilization
Period
min
Springs Homes AM Build Transportation Engineering
19 5
ICU Level ot Service
A
15
Synchro
Yr 2006
L
7 CJ
6 Report Page 1
HCM 3
Unsignalized
Randy Street
Intersection
Capacity Analysis
Laurel Street
1 5 2006
t
f Movement Lane
EBl
EBT
Configurations
Sign Control Volume vph Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
Direction lane Volume Total
vph
Volume
Right vph
Hadj s Departure Headway Degree Utilization x
Capacity veh h Delay 5 Approach Delay
s
Control
s
Approach LOS Intersection
NBl
NBT
NBR
SBl
SBT
Stop
Stop
1
Stop
Stop
SBR
0
12
20
40
5
3
8
26
103
9
50
0 63
0
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0 63
0
19
0 63
32
63
8
5
13
41
163
14
79
0
NB1
SB 1
6
Report Page 1
WB1
51
76
217
94
0
63
13
14
32
5
163
0 34
0 16
41 0
0 0 06
43
48
3 9
45
0 06
0 10
0 24
0 12
761
696
886
761
76
83
81
8 1
76
83
81
81
A
A
A
A
Summary 8 1
Intersection
JRH
WBR
1
HCM Level of Service
Helman
WBT
1
Delay
Analysis
WBl
1
0 63
EB1
Volume Left vph
EBR
I
I
Capacity Utilization
Period
min
Springs Homes AM Build Transportation Engineering
A 25 1
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2006
Synchro
4 f
HCM 6
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Randy Street Willow Street
Movement Lane
Sign
EBL
EBT
Configurations Control
Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor rate
WBR
4
Grade
Hourly flow
WBT
vph
1 4 2006
SBL
SBR
V
Free
Free
0
0
Stop 0
5
11
3
22
10
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
0 62
8
18
5
18
35
16
11
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed
ftIs
Percent
Blockage Right turn flare veh Median type
None
Median
storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting
vC1 vC2
stage stage
volume
23
48
14
1 cont vol 2 cont vol
vCu unblocked vol
23
48
14
4 1
4 6
62
tC
single s 2 stage s
tF
s
22
3 5
3 3
99
96
98
1593
957
1066
tC
pO cM
queue tree
capacity veh
h
Direction Lane
EB 1
Volume Total
26
Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to
Capacity
Queue Length 95th ft Control Delay s Lane LOS
52
8
0
35
0
18
16
1593
1700
989
0 01
0 01
0 05
0
0
4
23
00
88
00
8 8
23
s
Analysis
Helman JRH
A
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection
SB 1
23
A
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
WB1
5 2
Capacity
Period
Utilization
15 0
min
Springs Homes AM Build Transportation Engineering
ICU Level ot Service
A
15
Yr 2006
Synchro
4 f
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Randy Street Drager Street
10
of Movement
EBT
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
Grade
EBR
WBL
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow rate vph
If
WBT
NBL
1
4
V
Free
Free
Stop
0
0
0
Volume veh h
1 4 2006
NBR
9
0
3
10
0
7
0 78
0 78
0 78
0 78
0 78
0 78
12
0
4
13
0
9
Pedestrians Lane Width ft ftIs
Walking Speed Percent
Right
Blockage
turn flare veh
Median type
None
Median
veh
storage Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC conflicting volume vC 1 stage 1 cont vol vC2 stage 2 cont vol vCu unblocked vol tC tC
single 2 stage
tF
s
s
12
32
12
12
32
12
41
4 6
62
3 3
s
pO queue tree eM capacity veh h Direction Lane
EB1
Volume Total
WB1
22
35
100
100
99
1607
979
1069
NB 1
12
17
9
Volume Left
0
4
0
Volume
0
0
9
1700
1607
1069
0 01
0 00
0 01
0
0
00
1 7 A
A
00
1 7
4 8
Right
cSH Volume to Capacity Queue
Length 95th Control Delay s
ft
Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS
s
1 4 8
A
Intersection Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period min
Helman JRH
Springs Homes AM Build Yr Transportation Engineering
2 8 13 3
ICU Level ot Service
A
15
Synchro
2006
I
t
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Drager Street
12 Otis Street
1 4 2006
t Movement
EBl
lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
EBT
EBR
WBl
f
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
NBl
SBl
0
2
6
0 71
0 71
0 71
0 71
0 71
3
6
8
6
SBT
S6R
f Stop
0
4
3
NBR
Stop
0
2
0
NBT
f
Free
0
Volume veh h
WBR
f
Free
Grade
WBT
I
0
1
0
4
5
0
0
0 71
0 71
0 71
0 71
0 71
0 71
0 71
8
1
0
6
7
0
Pedestrians
0
Lane Width ft
Walking Speed Percent
Right
ftls
Blockage
tum flare veh
Median
type storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked
None
None
Median
vC
conflicting
vC 1 vC2
stage stage
volume
17
tC tF
single 2 stage
30
34
6
35
30
13
2 cont vol
vCu unblocked vol tC
6
1 cont vol
s
17
6
30
34
6
35
30
13
4 1
41
71
65
62
71
65
62
s
2
2 2
3 5
40
33
35
40
3 3
pO queue tree cM capacity veh h
100
100
100
100
99
99
100
100
1600
1615
977
856
1077
963
860
1068
Direction
s
Lane
EB 1
WB1
NB 1
Volume Total
8
20
7
7
Volume Left
3
3
1
7
Volume
0
8
6
0
1600
1615
1056
963
0 00
0 00
0 01
0 01
0
0
1
4 2
1 0
Right
cSH Volume to
Capacity
Queue Length 95th ft Control Delay s Lane LOS
Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection
s
JRH
1 8 8
A
A
A
A
4 2
1 0
4 8
88
A
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Analysis Period min
Helman
4 8
SB1
3 8 Utilization
Springs Homes PM Build Transportation Engineering
13 3
ICU Level ot Service
A
15
Yr 2006
Synchro
I
7 I
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
8 Otis Street
Laurel Street
1 4 2006
J Movement
EBl
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
Grade
EBR
NBl
Peak Hour Factor flow rate
vph
NBT
V
f
Stop
Free
0
Volume veh h
Hourly
t
0
SBT
SBR
Free 0
1
13
9
79
49
4
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
0 84
1
15
11
94
58
5
61
63
Pedestrians Lane Width ft ftIs
Walking Speed Percent
Right
Blockage
turn flare veh
Median
None
type storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC conflicting volume vC 1 stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 confvol Median
176
vCu unblocked vol tC tC
single 2 stage
tF
s
176
s
lane if
Direction Volume Total Volume Left
Right
cSH
Volume to Capacity Queue Control
Length Delay
95th ft
Approach Delay Approach LOS
s
JRH
22
3 5
3 3
100
98
99
808
1005
1540
EB1
NB1
SB1
17
105
63
1
11
0
15
0
5
987
1540
1700
0 02
0 01
0 04
1
1
0
08
00
A
A
87
08
0 0
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Analysis Period min
Helman
41
8 7
s
Lane LOS
Intersection
63
62
s
pO queue free cM capacity veh h
Volume
61
4 6
1 2 Utilization
Springs Homes PM Build Transportation Engineering
21 3
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2006
Synchro
1
ex
a
6
Report Page 1
HCM 3
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Randy Street
Laurel Street
Movement Lane
EBl
EBR
WBl
WBT WBR
NBl
t
I
NBT
NBR
SBl
Configurations
Sign Control Volume vph
Stop
Peak Hour Factor
Hourly flow
rate
vph
Direction lane Volume Total vph Volume Left vph Volume Right vph
Hadj
EBT
1 5 2006
Departure Headway
19
4
4
1
25
49
4
0 90
1
27
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0 90
0
0 90
0
21
0 90
4
4
1
28
54
4
1
30
1
EB 1
WB1
NB1
SB 1
21
10
87
32
4
28
1
21
1
4
1
0 57
0 06
0 07
0 02
36
42
4 1
41
0 01
0 10
0 04
veh h
963
823
868
871
Delay Approach Delay Approach LOS
7 6
73
75
72
67
73
75
72
A
A
A
A
Degree Capacity Control
s
x
s s
Stop
0
0 02
Utilization
Stop
SBR
0
0
s
Stop
SBT
1
Intersection Summary
Delay
73
HCM Level of Service Intersection
Analysis
Helman JRH
Capacity
Period
A
Utilization
21 4
min
Springs Homes PM Build Transportation Engineering
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Yr 2006
Synchro h
t
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Randy Street Willow Street
6
Movement Lane
EBL
EBT
Configurations
Grade Volume veh h
Free
Free
0
0
9
Peak Hour Factor flow rate
WBR
t
Sign Control
Hourly
WBT
0 71 13
vph
0
SBL
SBR
V Stop 0
0 0 71
1 4 2006
8 0 71 11
17
10
2
0 71
0 71
0 71
14
3
24
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftls Percent Blockage Right tum flare veh Median type Median storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC
conflicting
vC1
stage
None
volume
35
49
23
1 cont vol
vC2 stage 2 cont vol vCu unblocked vol te tC
single 2 stage
tF
s
s
Direction Lane Volume Total
Right
cSH Volume to
Capacity Length 95th Control Delay s
Queue
ft
22
3 5
33
99
99
100
1576
953
1053
WB1
SB1
13
35
17
13
0
14
0
24
3
1576
1700
968
0 01
0 02
0 02
1
0
1
00
8 8
00
88
A
Approach Delay Approach LOS
73
s
A
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection Capacity Analysis Period min
JRH
62
73
Lane LOS
Helman
23
4 6
EB1
Volume Left
Intersection
49
s
pO queue tree cM capacity veh h
Volume
35 4 1
37 Utilization
Springs Homes PM Build Transportation Engineering
172
ICU Level ot Service
A
15
Synchro
Yr 2006
I
c
I
6
Report Page 1
HCM
Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10 Randy Street Drager Street
1 4 2006
f Movement
EBT
Lane
Configurations
Sign
Control
WBL
0
Volume veh h Peak Hour Factor flow rate
WBT
t Free
Grade
Hourly
EBR
vph
NBL
NBR
V
Free
Stop
0
0
7
0
5
5
0
2
0 78
0 78
0 78
0 78
0 78
0 78
9
0
6
6
0
3
Pedestrians Lane Width ft
Walking Speed ftIs Percent Blockage Right turn flare veh Median type Median storage veh Upstream signal ft pX platoon unblocked vC conflicting volume vC 1 stage 1 conf vol vC2 stage 2 conf vol
None
9
28
9
28
9
41
4 6
62
vCu unblocked vol tC tC tF
single s 2 stage s s
queue free cM capacity veh h
pO
2 2
3 5
33
100
100
100
1611
983
1073
EB 1
WB1
NB 1
Volume Total
9
13
3
Volume Left
0
6
0
Volume
0
0
3
Direction Lane
Right
cSH
1700
Volume to Queue Control
Capacity
Length Delay
95th ft s
1611 0 00
0 00
0
0
0
00
36
4 8
A
A
3 6
Approach Delay Approach LOS
4 8
Intersection
00
s
A
Summary
Average Delay Intersection
Analysis
JRH
Capacity
2 8 Utilization
Period min
Springs Homes PM Build Transportation Engineering
Helman
1073
0 01
Lane LOS
9
14 7
ICU Level of Service
A
15
Synchro
Yr 2006
Ii
I
6
Report Page 1
JRH TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
APPENDIX VII ATR INFORMATION
LI I
Location
OR 1
33
MP
15
miles
4
82
ROGUE
south of
VALL Y
IGHWAY
NO
6
Recorder
Talent
HISTORICAL
Percent
of
Traffic
Max
Max
0 14 1957
ADT
HISTORICAL
Daily
15
September
TRAFFIC DATA
Average Year
TALEI1T
Installed
10TH
20TH
30TH
Day
Hour
Hour
Hour
Hour
H95
8323
124
10
6
10
2
10
1
10
0
1996
s822
126
10
7
10
2
10
1
10
0
1997
9058
124
10
4
10
1
10
0
9
9
1998
9395
122
10
5
10
1
10
0
10
0
1999
9510
124
10
7
10
1
10
0
9
9
2000
9462
123
10
7
10
2
10
0
10
0
2001
9419
2002
9447
131
14
0
11
4
10
7
10
5
2003
9661
l35
13
1
10
8
10
3
10
1
2004
9364
140
14
2
10
8
10
2
10
0
tiIp
1Il
MDT BY
YEAR
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
fiI
0 95
96
97
99
99
00
01
02
03
04
2004 TRAFFIC DATA iercent i
Average
ercent
Weekday
of
Traffic
ADT
Average
Percent
Daily
Classification Breakdown
of
Passenger
Traffic
ADT
Other
8703
93
January
9379
100
February
9770
104
9148
March
9920
106
9337
100
2
Single Single Single Single Single Single
98
of
Cars 4
axle Unit
2
Unit
3
Unit
tire axle
6
2
1
4
0
3
tire
or more
April
10290
110
9673
103
May
10135
loa
9630
103
June
10533
112
9910
106
July
10281
110
9617
103
ObI
Trailer
Truck
5
axle
August
10191
109
9524
102
Dbl
Trailer Truck
6
axle
september
10174
Trailer
7
axle
Oct ober
Trailer
1
27
axle
axle
4
vehicles
ACT 70
Truck
4
axle
Trailer Truck
5
axle
Trailer
6
axle
Truck
or
or
leSB
or more
less r
0
0
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
109
9575
102
ObI
10253
109
9554
102
Triple Trailer Trucks
0
0
November
9600
103
9000
96
Buses
0
1
December
9850
105
8700
93
Motorcycles
0
3
Location
OR 0
62 1
MP
0
mile
66
CRATER
northeast
LAKE HIGHWAY
NO
22
Percent of
Year
Traffic
1996
35525
NORTH
Max
Day 126
017 1995
TRAFfIC DATA
ADT
10TH
20TH
30TH
Hour
Hour
Hour
Hour
10
10
5
15
July
MDT BY YEAR
HISTORICAL Max
MEDFORD
Installed
Average
Daily
or more
Scooters
Recorder
of Biddle Road Overcrossing HISTORICAL
Truck
0
9
8
9
8
1997
34244
127
10
9
10
3
10
0
9
8
1998
33740
131
10
9
10
5
10
3
10
1
1999
34991
2000
36972
130
10
4
10
0
9
9
9
7
2001
36400
131
10
5
10
0
9
8
9
7
2002
38003
127
10
1
9
7
9
6
9
5
2003
37946
126
10
2
9
4
9
3
9
2
2004
38516
40000
I 30000
20000
1Il
96
97
98
00
99
01
02
03
04
2004 TRAFFIC DATA Percent
Average
l Januar
February
Percent
Weekday
of
Traffic
ADT
Average
Daily Traffic
Percent
of
Passenger
ADT
Other 2 axle
35991
93
35463
92
37444
97
37119
96
Breakdown
Classification 4
Single single Single Single Single
Unit
2
ani t
3
unit
4
March
39588
103
38509
100
April May
40500
105
39000
101
39800
103
38500
100
June
41100
l07
39700
103
Single
July
41500
108
39000
101
Dbl
Trailer
August
417 00
108
40200
104
ObI
Trailer
September
39600
103
38700
100
ObI
Trailer
OCtober
40100
104
38900
101
Triple
November
38600
100
38100
99
December
40000
104
39000
101
6
axle
Trailer
j I
8
2
1
0
6
0
1
0
4
1
2
or more
0
4
l
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
1
tire
or wore
Truck
4
axle
Trailer Truck
5
axle
Trailer
6
axle
Truck
Truck
5
axle
ruck 6
axle
Truck
Trailer
Motorcycles
9
52
axle axle
7
axle
Trucks
Scooters
or
or
ACT
41
tire vehicles
Buses
241
of
Cars
or
less
ess
mere
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
APPENDIX VIII CITY OF ASHLAND STREET DESIGN STANDARDS
i
i f
City
of Ashland
Street Standards Handbook
City
of Ashland
Department of Community Development Planning Division 20 East Main Street Ashland OR 97520 488 541
5305
I rr
J
Table 1
City
of Aishland Street WTTHIN
TYPE OF
T STREP
ADT
RO W
CURB
TO
Design Standards
CURB TOCURB AREA
CURB
MOTOR VEHICLE
MEDIAN AND OR
PAVEMENT
TRA VEL
CENTER
WIDTH
LANES
TURN
WIDTH
BIKE
PARK
LANES
ING
LANE
a L 2
arrl Boule
Lane 3
8 000to
arrl Boule
fi lane
30 000
rrl Bouie
2 ltJne
ADT
Avenue
3 000
tS1l7
73
9
0
34
119
48
121
59
11
5
on
on
oth I
both
SId
irkls
sid
on
both
2a s
inS
I
7
1T
2a
inS
II
7
fT
2a s
in J
I
s r
none
2a 6
InS
e
7 8
each
bays
8
7
6
SIDE WALKS
both sides
5
10
s
fIY I
11
32 33
PARK ROW
on
none
11
a
CURB
fO fO S
8 10 1
6 10
10 000 ane L 3
Avenue
ADT
70 5
1
436 445
10 10 5
11 1
2a
s
97 5
cll
In S
5 10
bays
Nefghborhood Coilector Resldentlai
f 500 to NA
No
Parldng
HA
I
5 000
49
ADT
50 56
25 27
9
10
57 13
32 34
9
10
1
22
11 nOne
Parlrlng One
SIde
ona
Parlelng
Both Sides
7
woT
8
8
S
7 S
5 6
7
56
6
SS
S
Neighborhood Collector CommnllIl Parallel Pmlng One Side
56
5
28
10
Parallel Parldng Both Sides
83 73
38
10
86 74
37
10
81
54
10
Dlagonai Parlrlng
One Side
1
one8
arlrlngBoth
Sides
Neighborhood SIlveI Residential
91
8 10
twos
6
7
5 10
one
6
78
8 10
two
1
78
6
fO
less NA
than
Parlelng
One Side
1 500
P rlrln
Both Sides
ADT
47 51
21
NA
16
one
7 i
7 8
5 6
6
78
5 1
11 14 50 57
26 28
Queuing
two 7
lanes Alley
78 I
I
Diagonal
a
NA
16
12 pa ed wIdIh 2 rips s
NA
NA
HA
none
none
none
none
on
both sides Use MullJ
Path
NA
1IY 1S
8fO pWJd wIdIh 2
NA
NA
NA
none
fIOne
none
non
sttfps On both Idea harrl
sc
pe
parlrlOw with
6 sidewalk sh
lree wells shall ba usedIn
1I beInstalled in residential areas 6
commere
10
alllreas
sidewalk
shall be
Installed In
commerel
llI s
I
bike lanes all
generally
nol needed
on
ow volume less Ihan 3 000
l AOT
andor ow Ira vel
K Less spe
Ihan
15mp
silvers
25March99
Page
20 of
Street Standards Handbook City of Ashland
f
JRH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERINCi jdl 01
t Qm
EUGENE P65
Plant LHop illag l IH FII
t
n
1
I
i
ol
7 1 H H
uih 201 H 1
I
MEDFORD il
t fbin Fa
idfonL I
1
L Hlite lTi rq oH
77il
t
t 7
6
4 0
IC
