Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Radar Technology For Commodity Goods

   EMBED


Share

Transcript

RFID Radio Frequency IDentification RADAR Technology for Commodity Goods Raj Bridgelall Symbol Technologies January 2004 Disclaimer: This presentation reflects the personal understandings and opinions of the author only and is not intended in any way to convey any position, policy, or opinion of the author’s employer, Symbol Technologies, Inc. The author and Symbol Technologies, Inc. disclaim any liability for any errors or omissions in this paper. Raj Bridgelall Have You Used RFID Before? Automated Toll Mobil Speedpass™ Freedom Pay™ Smart Cards Automotive Security Retail Security Tags Access Control Raj Bridgelall 2 Spectrum of Data-Capture Technologies Manual ID, Short Range, Small Memory Unattended ID, Long Range, Large Memory Active Semi-Passive Functionality Passive Tags • R/W Memory • Non-Line-of-Sight • Simultaneous ID • Rugged 13.56 MHz <135 kHz 1234 5670 Raj Bridgelall Battery-based Tags • Much longer range • Location Finding • Larger R/W Memory • Non-Line-of-Sight • Simultaneous ID But ... • Most expensive • Short useful life • Less Rugged Chip-less Tags • Non-Line-of-Sight • Limited cingulation 1D Barcode • Lowest Cost ~900 MHz Magnetic Stripe • Durable • Data Hiding 2D Barcode • Larger Data Capacity • Greater Data Integrity Cost 3 Will This Ever Happen? Raj Bridgelall 4 RFID Behind The Scenes Antenna Integrated Circuit Raj Bridgelall 5 Modes, Types, and Classes of RFID Technology E-field Mode Propagation Systems (400 - 900 MHz) B-Field Mode Inductive Systems (125 kHz & ~13MHz) λ/4 Tag Reader Tag λ/4 Reader Reader: Detects Load Modulation Tag: Modulates Inductive Coupling Reader: Detects Changes in Voltage Standing Wave Ratio Types Power Communication Cost Passive Beam Backscatter Semi-passive Battery Backscatter Active Raj Bridgelall Battery Radiated EM $0.15 – $0.50 $0.80 - $2 $8 - $75 Tag: Reflects EM Class 0: Read-Only Class 1: WORM Class 2: Read-Write Class 3: Sensors Class 4: Wireless Nodes 6 How Does Passive RFID Work? Single Tag Communications Volts Antenna RF Coax 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Host Electronics Raj Bridgelall 7 How Does Passive RFID Work? Multiple Tag Communications Binary Tree Traversal Antenna RF Coax Host Electronics TDMA Raj Bridgelall Tag 1 Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 Tag 5 Tag n TS: Begin … End TS: Assignment 8 How Does Passive RFID Work? Non-Line-of-sight Antenna RF Coax Host Electronics Raj Bridgelall 9 Maximum Range for Passive Tags Volts Antenna RF Coax Host Electronics Forward Link Limited: Power Transfer Raj Bridgelall 10 Passive Tag Range is Forward Link Limited Ps Reader Chip Power Consumption Factor rmax rmax λ ≅ 4π  2 Pa ( 1 VL + δ w ) 2 2πCa    + (VL + δ w ) Psψ r  t AM   ηrηc (1 − Rbit t AM ) (2VL + δ w ) Pd Pr 1 2 Rectifier, ηr Vd Iant vp Vb La Vin Ca Rm Antenna, & Matching Ic Clamp ψr − Reg Pa ηc Cp ZLogic Passive Tag IC Reference: Bridgelall, R., “System Optimization for Passive RF Sensors,” Patent Application, April 2004 Raj Bridgelall 11 Power Distribution in a Multipath Environment Power Distribution at 868 MHz Ceiling Antenna Signal Peak Floor Signal Cancellation Palomar, Anu-Leena Annala, et.al. Raj Bridgelall Peaks (- 3 dBm) Nulls (- 14.3 dBm) 12 Maximum Range for Semi-passive Tags Antenna RF Coax Host Electronics Backscatter Link Limited: RX Sensitivity Raj Bridgelall 13 Semi-Passive Tag Range is Backscatter Link Limited Ps Reader ΨT Rsource rmax en NB Pe kB*To*fr Vin Rmatch SNR LNA Demodulator Data Bits in Noise Figure Ro LO λ 4 Pr  1 1  λ   Rbit (r , p e ) = Ps ΨT2ψ r   2( N B −2 )  k B T0 f r  4πr     r 1 + R  0  ψr Semi-Passive Tag BATT  1   2 ln 1  2p  e    Receiver sensitivity dominates next Reference: Bridgelall, R., “Performance Characterization of Active and Passive Protocol Compatible Bluetooth/802.11 RF Tags,” Proceedings of the 6th CDMA International Conference, Seoul, Korea, October 30th, 2001. Raj Bridgelall 14 Data Rate (Bits per second) Semi-Passive Tag Range at UHF and 2.45 GHz Line-of-Sight: 915 MHz 8 1 10 Line-of-Sight: 2.45 GHz 7 1 10 6 1 10 5 1 10 4 1 10 3 1 10 100 Multi-path: 2.45 GHz 10 Multi-path: 915 MHz 1 0.1 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Range (Feet) Reference: Bridgelall, R., “Performance Characterization of Active and Passive Protocol Compatible Bluetooth/802.11 RF Tags,” Proceedings of the 6th CDMA International Conference, Seoul, Korea, October 30th, 2001. Raj Bridgelall 15 History of RFID Development 1940 1950 1948 Harry Stockman “Communication By Means of Reflected Power” 1960 1966 Checkpoint & Sensormatic EAS Commercialization 1-bit Electronic Article Surveillance 1950’s D.B. Harris Patents “Radio Transmission Systems with Modulatable Passive Responder” 1940’s RADAR Perfected in WWII Raj Bridgelall 1970 1959 Friend or Foe Military Long Range Transponder 1980 1990 1979 First Implantable RFID for Livestock 1975 Los Alamos Scientific Labs Declassified “Short-range Radio-telemetry for Electronic Identification using Modulated Backscatter” 2000 1996 LA Adopts Pet Tagging 1992 First RFID Toll Collection System in U.S. 1949 – Norman Woodman’s Barcode Concept 1974 – First Barcode Scanned 2003 Mandate 2003 Military Mandate 16 RFID Hype Life-cycle Peak of Hype: Failed Pilots Industry Consolidation Activity 13.56 MHz Technology Widely Available (Poor range, >$1) ISO-15693 MIT Auto-ID Center (1999) Supertag™ “Barcode Replacement” Demonstrated. UHF Available: Tags < 50¢ >10 foot range 1998 Invention Raj Bridgelall Prototyping Marketing Viable Middleware (EPC, ONS, PML, …) Privacy Issues Significant Pilots Wal*Mart, DoD, others 2002 2003 Disillusionment Deployment Based on a model from The Gartner Group Time Maturity 17 History of RFID Standardization – Complex International International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) International Organization for Standardization (ISO) International Telecommunications Union (ITU) ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1 (JTC 1) TC 104 (ISO 10374) Freight Containers TC 204 Road Informatics TC 122 Packaging SC 17 Smart Cards ITUITU-T (fka (fka CCITT) Telecommunications ITUITU-R (fka (fka CCIR & IFBR) RadioRadio-frequency Issues SC 31 Automatic Data Capture ITUITU-D (fka (fka BDT) Telecommunications Development Regional Comité Européen Normalisation (CEN) National Standards Australia (SAA) Comité Européen Normalisation Electrotechnique (CENELEC) ECMA British Standards Institute (BSI) AFNOR MHI AIM Deutches Institut fur Normung (DIN) ANSI EIA UCC European Telecommunications Standardization Institute (ETSI) NCITS IEEE JISC Other Industry Comptia Raj Bridgelall ATA EIA AIA HIBCC AIAG GTAG Other MIT AutoAuto-ID Center 18 UCC™ and EAN™ forms EPCglobal™ First End-User Driven Standardization Process in History Raj Bridgelall 19 Passive Tag Construction and Cost Projections The UHF ‘Smart Label’ Antenna 60 Chip w/ Diode Markup (< 10 cents) (<3 cents) Package 50 Attach Die Attach (~ 3 cents) Price (Cents) Antenna Chip 40 100’s of Millions 30 20 10 Packaging (~ 4 cents) 100’s of Billions 0 2002 2004 2008 2006 Year Labor + Overhead Extra Based on 50 MU Raj Bridgelall 20 Emerging RFID Killer Application Retail Supply Chain Management – Tracking Goods Across Enterprises Mfg Item Case Barcode Source Tagging Pallets RFID/Barcode Package Aggregation Trucks Distributor Trucks Pallets Portal/Infrastructure Reading (RFID/RTLS) Unattended Auto-ID Case Item RFID Shelf and Hand-Held Reading Store User Barcode/EAS Reading u The problem = ~$40B/year ♦ Lost goods, wrong delivery, untimely delivery, … u Costly results according to various studies ♦ ♦ ♦ Raj Bridgelall 15% of shoppers leave without finding an item. $10 billion in goods “lost” during delivery process. 20% of perishables expire before they are sold. 21 Stage I - Pallet and Case Level Tracking Automated Pallet Assembly Aggregated Pallet Reading (Barcoded RFID Label) (Semi-passive or Passive Tags) Manual Case Verification (Barcode/RFID) Raj Bridgelall Automatic Case Verification (Passive Tags) Container Tracking (GPS, Active Tags) 22 Stage II - Item Level Smart Shelves Minimizing Shrinkage & Counterfeit Minimizing ‘Out-of-Stock’ Conditions Raj Bridgelall 23 Tough Technical Challenges for Immediate Applications (Non-Item Level) Raj Bridgelall 24 RFID Portals False Reads Good Reads False Reads Key Objectives u Eliminate cross-portal reads ♦ Stuff gets on the wrong truck – costly error. u High throughput ♦ 60 - 100 items at fork-lift speeds. u Robustness of reads ♦ ♦ Raj Bridgelall Close to 100% of items. Liquids and metals distort field. 25 Tag Detuning and Energy Absorption H2O Dipole Energy Absorption Liquid 0 0 0 0 Reader Antenna 0 Tag Antena H(ωo,Q) Vb Iant La Ca Rm Power Transfer Cparasitic Free-Space Tag Detuned Tag Operating Frequency Raj Bridgelall 26 RFID System Design Considerations Regulatory Layer (Interference/ Public Safety) Interference Human Exposure Far-Field Near-Field Compliance CENELEC/TC211 IEEE/ANSI C95.1 RCR STD-38 Recommendations Pwr-Up/Active Transmit SB Radiation Inter-operability Layer (Standards Driver) Key Physical Layer (Cost Driver) SB Radiation Modulation Scheme Operating Frequency (ASK/PSK/FSK) Battery Reader Output Pwr (Process/Cost) Time Avg Power Coding Scheme Packaging Antenna Design IC Design Protocol/ Architecture (Cost, E/H Field) This Determines That Major Form-Factor Flexibility Performance/ Features Layer (Application Driver) Minor Raj Bridgelall Life/ Reliability R/W Overall Capacity/ Tag Size Type Pconsumed Pdelivered Read Range Multi-Tag/ Throughput/ Data Rate Environmental Compatibility Metals/Water/WLAN Directionality Uni, Omni 27 RFID Transceiver Issues Control ASK MOD VGA PA Data BPF Ideal Transceiver Errors I Multi-path Reflector antenna VSWR Tx antenna VSWR 0 90 Static reflectors Q Moving reflectors Non-coherent Desired Signal Raj Bridgelall 28 Multi-Reader Interference Raj Bridgelall 29 Interference Throughput For Two RFID Systems Measured Throughput: Interferers are of the same protocol. Throughput Degradation from Single System 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Protocol A 30 Protocol B 20 10 0 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Interferer Distance From Tags (Feet) Raj Bridgelall 30 Reader/Tag Interference Scenarios Interference Reader IM Products Reader (Frequency Domain) AM Modulation (Forward Commands) CW Interference AM Modulation Backscatter with AM Modulation Interference IM Products Tag RX (Time Domain) Fast Beats = BER Slow Beats = “Gap Filling” Beat Note and Power Cycling Reader CW (Backscatter) Backscatter Raj Bridgelall Interferer CW Reader is transmitting = OK Worst Case Fast Beats = BER Slow Beats = “Gap Filling” 31 Summary and Conclusions uRADAR for commodity goods ♦ ♦ ♦ Dominant application in retail supply chain asset tracking Cost declining steadily Standards emerging rapidly uTough technical challenges remain ♦ Robustness of identification – not 100% accurate yet – Metals and water – Read zone localization – Interference from other RF equipment including other RFID ♦ Raj Bridgelall Speed of identification in all regulatory environments 32