Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Selling Intelligent Ssd

   EMBED


Share

Transcript

Selling Intelligent SSD Chad Thibodeau Agenda ƒ Session Objectives ƒ Feature Overview ƒ Technology Overview ƒ Compellent Differentiators ƒ Competition ƒ Case Study ƒ Available Resources ƒ Questions to Ask Compellent Confidential, 2 3 Things to Remember When Selling SSD 1. Lowest cost of entry – 2 data drive minimum + Data Progression – Investment protection using existing enclosures 2. Compellent is using Enterprise-class SSD – Data integrity is highest priority 3. Finding the right opportunities – SSD is not for everything – low latency applications benefit the most Compellent Confidential, 3 Audience Response Requested Q: What is the primary barrier to SSD adoption? 1. Cost 2. ROI justification 3. Determining the right application 4. Reliability concerns Cost Compellent Confidential, 4 25% 25% 25% 25% ROI justif... Determinin... Reliabilit... Compellent’s SSD Overview ƒ ONLY SAN solution with block-level intelligence ƒ Specifications • 146 GB capacity • 4Gb Fibre Channel interface • STEC Zeus IOPS™ ƒ Storage Center Requirements • Storage Center 4.5 or greater • 4Gb SBOD Enclosure – FW 08.08 or greater • 4Gb front end connection Compellent Confidential, 5 The Need for Solid State Storage * Courtesy of ESG – “The State of Solid State” March 2009 Compellent Confidential, 6 Spinning Media is Not Keeping Up ƒ Applications continue to demand more performance ƒ Hard drives have peaked at 15K RPM ƒ Hard drive latency is limited to that of an individual drive *Courtesy of Intel ƒ Increasing spindle count for IO performance may result in unused capacity “Solid-State disks that replace hard disks are the easiest way of adding solid-state storage to an existing array.” – Storage Magazine July 2008 Compellent Confidential, 7 FLASH Pricing Continues to Decline ƒ NAND FLASH pricing expected to decline faster than HDD ƒ Expecting 50-70% FLASH component price decline year-over-year ƒ Rapid adoption of SSD technology expected Compellent Confidential, 8 All FLASH is Not the Same Enterprise Drive Consumer Drive Compellent Confidential, 9 Drive Level Comparison FC SSD FC HDD SATA HDD Tier 0 Tier 1 or 2 Tier 3 146 GB 450 GB 1 TB Access Times / Latency 20-120 µs 2 ms 4 ms MTBF (hours) 1.6 million 1.6 million 1.2 million 220 MB/s – read 115 MB – write 170 MB/s – read 110 MB/s – write 100 MB/s – read 100 MB/s – write Best Better Good 8 Watts 16 watts 11 watts Applications Capacities Sustained Data Rates Vibration Tolerance Power Consumption Compellent Confidential, 10 Solid State Storage Implementation Options FLASH CACHE RAM HDD (3.5”/2.5”) HBA Controller <$30K < $5K >$100K DB acceleration OLTP financial analysis Web 2.0 DB acceleration OLTP financial analysis Web 2.0 DB acceleration OLTP financial analysis Web 2.0 Management Storage Array Server RAM Controller IOPS Performance 30,000-50,000 80,000+ 600,000+ Form Factor Unit Price Targeted Applications Compellent Confidential, 11 Enterprise vs. Consumer Flash SSD Enterprise Flash SSD ƒ Single-level cell (SLC) Consumer Flash SSD ƒ Multi-level cell (MLC) Stores one bit per cell Stores multiple bits per cell ƒ Higher cell endurance ƒ Lower cell endurance 100,000+ writes 10,000+ writes ƒ Dual-ported interface ƒ Commercial interface FC, SAS USB, FireWire, SATA ƒ Wear-leveling algorithms ƒ Only remaps bad blocks ƒ Multi-channel parallel IO ƒ Optimized for reads ƒ Designed for 24x7x365 ƒ Designed for 9x5 Compellent Confidential, 12 SSD RAID Comparison RAID Minimum Configuration Automated Tiered Storage Compellent Others 10 5 3 Drives 6 Drives (2 + 1 hot spare) (5 + 1 hot spare) Yes No Compellent Confidential, 13 Data Progression ƒ Reduced cost of storage (CAPEX) –Buy less storage –Leverage lower cost storage when required ƒ Reduced operational costs (OPEX) –Fewer FTE resources for administration ƒ Reduced downtime through additional recovery points –Integration with Data Instant Replay ƒ Business Partner differentiation –Unique value proposition is highly differentiated Compellent Confidential, 14 Cost = 1/10 Differences in Tiered Storage Traditional Compellent Tier 1 Tier 2 Problem: Storage Tiers Solution: Data Progression • Some vendors support ability to move volumes between tiers • Different drive types supported • Automated data classification and movement is bi-directional • Replays are automatically placed on Tier 3, typically at least 20% the cost • Allows creation of 5 times more recovery points • Do not provide automated data movement • Requires third party software for classification and movement • Snapshots must be stored on same disk type as volume Compellent Confidential, 15 Data Progression Mechanics ƒ Metadata accurately determines ideal data placement ƒ Intelligent movement between tiers based on frequency of access ƒ Volumes and files are stored across technology and RAID levels based on performance and redundancy attributes ƒ Enable migration for a complete volume for specific periods of time Compellent Confidential, 16 Compellent Differentiators ƒ Leverage Data Progression to minimize customer CAPEX and utilize SSD for most active data ƒ Through Dynamic Block Architecture (DBA) have the ability to put a portion of a volume on SSD ƒ Thin Provisioning supported for all drive types – SSD, Fibre Channel and SATA ƒ Investment protection – use existing SBOD enclosure Compellent Confidential, 17 Competitive Analysis Feature Competitor Compellent Compellent Difference Drive Type STEC ZeusIOPS™ STEC Zeus IOPS™ None Disk Enclosure Unique enclosure required for SSDs; existing customers must upgrade Uses existing fibre channel 4Gb enclosure Ability to use existing enclosures – $3K-$5K savings Min # of SSDs 6 (5 for RAID 5 + hot spare) 3 (2 for RAID10 + hot spare) 50% savings Data Progression Volumes only support one drive type (e.g. SSD) Automatic Data Progression 80% savings Volumes do not support “Thin Provisioning” Dynamic Capacity is supported regardless of drive type 50% savings Data Growth Compellent Confidential, 18 SSD Performance ƒ Exchange DB example – 30 hard drives replaced by 1 SSD – Read and Write latency went down by over 50% – Power Savings = 98% – Drive Savings = 33% Compellent Confidential, 19 SSD Candidates ƒ All vertical markets ƒ Applications –Defense –E-commerce –Entertainment –Financial Services –Telecommunications –Database Storage –Online Transaction Processing –Data warehousing –Web File Sharing –Identifying Hot Files Data Patterns Tend to be… High Writes, Random Small Block High Reads, Random Small Block High Writes, Sequential, Single Threaded Small Block High Reads quickly follow writes Small Block High Writes, Sequential Large Block High Reads, Sequential Large Block Compellent Confidential, 20 HDD Flash Audience Response Requested Q: Compellent’s SSD solution leverages which of the following features? A. Data Progression 25% B. DBA 25% C. Dynamic Capacity 25% D. All of the above 25% Compellent Confidential, 21 Where To Get More Information ► SC 4.5 Sourcebook ► SSD Selling Guide ► Applications Best Practices ► Business Partner Portal – Flash Demo ► Storage Center Technical Data Sheet ► Chad Thibodeau – [email protected] 952-567-6533 Compellent Confidential, 22 Questions to Ask Question Response Do you have applications that could benefit from improved performance? Solid State Disks provide the lowest latency, dramatically improving performance for applications requiring next-to-zero latency. Are you looking to improve the overall reliability of your storage environment? Because Solid State Disks do not contain any moving parts, their reliability exceeds that of spinning media. Has your datacenter ran out of power and/or rack space for storage equipment? Solid State Disks require ½ of the power that an equivalent rotating media hard drive (e.g. 8 watts for SSD vs. 16 watts for 15K fibre channel drive). Compellent Confidential, 23 Session Evaluation ƒ Please rate this session by responding to the following questions. ƒ Your feedback helps us to improve the quality of future sessions. ƒ Unlike the previous polling questions, your responses will not be visible on the screen but will be captured and recorded for the presenter to view offline. ƒ Should you have additional feedback, please utilize one of the hard copy evaluation forms at the back of the room to provide us with your written comments. Compellent Confidential, 24 Session Evaluation: Audience Response Requested Q: This subject is ____ to performing my job? 50% Not Applicable Slightly Useful Important Very Important Critical 20% 13% ot Compellent Confidential, 25 Cr iti ca l 7% Ap pl ic ab Sl le ig ht ly U se fu l Im po rt Ve an ry t Im po rt an t 10% N 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Session Evaluation: Audience Response Requested Q: I would like ____ in the material presented. 27% 20% 17% A Lo t M or e D et ai l D et ai l e .. M or Am e Sa m Th e Compellent Confidential, 26 ou nt . D Le ss D Le ss t Lo et ai l 7% et ai l A Lot Less Detail Less Detail The Same Amount of Detail More Detail A Lot More Detail A 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 30% Session Evaluation: Audience Response Requested Q: I would rate the presenter as ____. Poor Below Average Average Good Exceptional 27% 23% 23% al pt io n oo d ce e ra g ve A G Ex el ow A ve r Po Compellent Confidential, 27 13% ag e or 13% B 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Compellent Confidential, 28 Tiered Storage Strategy Business Need st Co Storage Type Compellent Confidential, 29 SSD Customer Opportunities Large Enterprise Customers ƒ Price insensitive Mid-size Customers ƒ Price sensitive Large SSD capacity 146GB SSD target Smallest SSD capacity 73GB SSD target ƒ Large systems ƒ Medium-sized systems 2 or 3 tiers ≥ 8 SSD drives per system Will use Data Progression 2 tiers typical ≤ 8 SSD drives per system May not use Data Progression ƒ Enterprise apps ƒ Specific apps on SSD Oracle/SQL logs >10,000 Exchange users On-line Transaction Processing ƒ 5% of CML customers Oracle/SQL logs (smaller size) <5000 Exchange users Home-grown applications ƒ 95% of CML customers Compellent Confidential, 30