Transcript
The clock is ticking, upgrade now! Support for Microsoft* Windows Server* 2003/R22 is ending in July 20153. Make businesses future-proof with latest technology.
300 days
12 mio
>
Servers still running Microsoft Windows Server 2003.2
Act now!
2
2
Typical migration time of servers and aplications.2
Security and compliance problems are impending.
&
options and opportunities for small and mediumsized business
Power consumption of Servers, older than 4 years.1
Update OS only
implications response
65%
4%
Performance of Servers, older than 4 years.1
Move everything to the cloud
32%
of installed Servers, are older than 4 years.1
Modernize on-premise Server and OS
Benefit from technological progress by updating infrastructure and OS.
Move some apps to cloud, Modernize on-premise Server and OS
Fixes only half the problem: Misses out on new hardware-features, consolidation, performance and responsiveness.
May offer lower CapEx Is it right for your business, data location, security, cloud availability?
Help your business succeed: Enable new manageability & security features, software porting
Best of both May need to keep some Apps/Data on premise. Use cloud where it makes sense
May not work because of drivers. Low productivity, high power consumption, poor responisveness Why not instead... future-proof
Public cloud or Private cloud? Help available to guide you.
Help available for migration planning, Windows Server 2012 & Intel® benefits. Consolidate servers.
Likely to be best option for most businesses. Cost effective, efficient and allows IT to keep control
Gain performance by refreshing infrastructure. By upgrading to a Intel® Xeon® Processor E5v3 based server, you could get these improvements in performance.
Based on their current system, businesses can benefit from up to 9 times greater performance and 9.4 times better energy-efficiency. The overview below, gives an impression of the potential improvements, based on the age of the current infrastructure. Energy efficiency improvement (factor)4 Consolidation ratio5
9.4
Performance improvement (factor)6
10:1 9
8:1
3.2 1.5
1.2
Age of Server (years)
1.9 2:1 2
3:1
3
3.5
5:1 4.5
5.3
5.2
2
3
4
5
6
7
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v2
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5
Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600
Intel® Xeon® Processor 5600
Intel® Xeon® Processor 5500
Intel® Xeon® Processor 5400
© 2015 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, and Xeon are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. 1 Source: Intel Fortune 100 Company server installed base survey, 2012 2 mio = million, source: Microsoft estimates 2013 3 http://www.microsoft.com/de-de/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/ 4 Source: Intel® estimated SPECpower* results. Process for Energy Efficience Ratings: Filter by published year; select highest result by following criteria: 2-socket configurations only, 2-socket Xeon® processor families only (E5, E5v2, E5v3, 5XXX) Factors are calculated in reference to Intel® Xeon® E5-2699v3, OS: Win Server 2012 - SPECpower result: 10661. 2 year old system: Intel® Xeon® E5-2660v2, OS: Win Server 2012 - SPECpower result: 8533. 3 year old system: Intel® Xeon® E5-2470, OS: Win Server 2008 R2 - SPECpower result: 5717. 4 year old system: Intel® Xeon® X5675, OS: Win Server 2008 R2 - SPECpower result: 3329. 5 year old system: Intel® Xeon® L5640, OS: Win Server 2008 - SPECpower result: 3052. 6 year old system: Intel® Xeon® L5530, OS: Win Server 2008 - SPECpower result: 2053. 7 year old system: Intel® Xeon® L5430, OS: Win Server 2003 - SPECpower result: 1135. 8 years old: Intel® Xeon® E5450, OS: Win Server 2003 - SPECpower result: 698. 5 Source: Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Server Refresh Savings Estimator http://estimator.intel.com/serverroi/ Perform server refresh modelling with following criteria: Target platform for refresh: 2S Xeon® E5-2600v3. Scenario: Physical to Virtual 6 Source: Intel® estimated SPECint*_rate_base2006 results. Process for Performance Ratings: Filter by published year; select highest result by following criteria: 2-socket Xeon® processor families only (E5, E5v2, E5v3, 5XXX, legacy 2S families), Workstation designated CPUs included, as tested with server OS, x86 based configurations only. Factors are calculated in reference to Intel® Xeon® E5-2699v3, OS: Red Hat Enterprise* Linux 6.5* - spec_int_rate2006 result: 1460. 2 year old system: Intel® Xeon® E5-2697v2, OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.5 - spec_int_rate2006 result: 972. 3 year old system: Intel® Xeon® E5-2687W, OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.5 - spec_int_rate2006 result: 711. 4 year old system: Intel® Xeon® X5680, OS: SUSE* Enterprise Linux 11* - spec_int_rate2006 result: 478. 5 year old system: Intel® Xeon® X5680, OS: SUSE* Linux Enterprise Desktop 11*- spec_int_rate2006 result: 418. 6 year old system: Intel® Xeon® E5590, OS: SUSE* Enterprise Linux 10* - spec_int_rate2006 result: 274. 7 year old system: Intel® Xeon® X5492, OS: SUSE Enterprise Linux 10 - spec_int_rate2006 result: 162. 8 year old system: Intel® Xeon® X5482, OS: SUSE Enterprise Linux 10 - spec_int_rate2006 result: 99,1. Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel® microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark* and MobileMark*, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
