Preview only show first 10 pages with watermark. For full document please download

Volte*: A Lightweight Voice Solution To 4g Lte

   EMBED


Share

Transcript

VoLTE*: A Lightweight Voice Solution to 4G LTE Networks Guan-Hua Tu1, Chi-Yu Li1, Chunyi Peng2, Zengwen Yuan1, Yuanjie Li1, Xiaohu Zhao2, Songwu Lu1 1University of California, Los Angeles 2The Ohio State University HotMobile’16 Voice: Essential Cellular Service § 30+ years (from 1G to 4G) § Full coverage: ¨ ¨ Chunyi Peng All carriers Almost all users HotMobile'16 2 Voice Evolution in 4G LTE § 4G LTE: packet-switched (PS) only ¨ Traditional voice: circuit-switched (CS) for carriergrade quality Internet PS Domain 4G Gateway circuit circuit CS Gateways 3G/2G CS Domain Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 Telephony circuit Network 3 Voice Evolution in 4G LTE § 4G LTE: packet-switched (PS) only ¨ Traditional voice: circuit-switched (CS) for carriergrade quality PS Domain ? Internet 4G Gateway Telephony Network Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 4 VoLTE: Voice over LTE § Standard solution (cellular carrier industry) § Carry voice in packets (aka. VoIP) VoLTE Signaling Flow Data Packet Flow VoLTE Voice Flow PS Domain Internet 4G Gateway IMS Core Chunyi Peng Signaling Server HotMobile'16 Telephony Media Gateway Network 5 The Good § Successor of cellular voice for LTE users ¨ Comparable carrier-grade quality § Enable rich communication ¨ Voice/video calls, video conferencing, HD voice … Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 6 But, The Ugly § Deployment pain ¨ ¨ 20 out of 480 LTE carriers support VoLTE (Oct 2015) Delayed rollout until late 2014 in US carriers (AT&T, Verizon, TMobile) - No nationwide deployment yet § IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS): complex and costly Proposed in 2002 ¨ Little progress until VoLTE ¨ Chunyi Peng IMS Core HotMobile'16 Signaling Server Media Gateway 7 Alternative to VoLTE § VoIP: on-the-top (OTT) mobile data app ¨ Hangouts, Skype, Line, Viber, Whatsapp, … PS Domain 4G Gateway VoIP Service § Pros: low cost (Carriers), OTT benefits § Cons (concerns): quality? Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 8 Q1: VoLTE or no VoLTE? Q2: Alternative lightweight and costeffective solution? Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 9 VoLTE or No VoLTE? Comparison VoLTE and VoIP over 4G LTE § § § Chunyi Peng Deployment cost Operation complexity Voice quality HotMobile'16 10 Deployment and Operation VoLTE - Deploy IMS - Upgrade 4G infrastructure ¨ ¨ BS, PS gateways, and OAM (Operation, Administration, management) subsystem Upgrade firmware/OS of mobile devices to support carrier-specific VoLTE VoIP over 4G LTE + No new deployment/upgrade ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ - Concerns - Chunyi Peng Reuse 4G PS infrastructure Reuse VoIP service provider’s infrastructure Existing Cellular – VoIP translation No upgrade on mobile devices HotMobile'16 Quality? Compatibility with legacy voice 11 Voice Call Quality § Small-scale assessment ¨ ¨ 10 static locations, 20 routes, 50 participants VoIP: Google Hangouts § Call setup time § Voice call quality (subjective) § Call drop rate Note: VoLTE at early deployment (12/2014 – 02/2015) Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 12 Call Setup time § Comparable performance except VoIP-CS case ¨ ¨ Caller-to-Callee: V-to-V, V-to-C, H-to-H, H-to-C V: VoLTE; C: CS; H: Hangout § Takeaway: enhance VoIP-CS call support Signal strength is week (<-115dbm) Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 Signal strength is strong (>-90dbm) 13 Voice Call Quality § Record calls and offline listening ¨ ITU standard metrics: ACR (Absolute Category Rating) and CCR (Category Rating Comparison) § Comparable voice quality (VoLTE win: congestion & CS) ACR: Absolute Category Rating Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 CCR: Category Rating Comparison 14 Call Drop Rate Scenarios VoLTE Hangout Static (strong/weak coverage) 0% 0% Mobility (4G only, strongà weak) 0% 0.5% Mobility (4G à2G/3G) 8% 4% § Comparable in static and most mobility § VoLTE (4G-2G/3G): even worse (implementation issues on SRVCC) [mobicom’15] [mobicom’15] Yunhan Jia, et.al, Performance Characterization and Call Reliability Problem Diagnosis for Voice over LTE Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 15 VoLTE’s Advantage: High QoS Bearer Internet PS Domain 4G Gateway VoLTE VoIP IMS Core Signaling Server Media Gateway PS Domain 4G Gateway Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 VoIP Service 16 VoLTE’s Advantage: High QoS Bearer 4G Gateway VoLTE Voice Bearer VoLTE Signaling Bearer Delivery Guaranteed-Bit-Rate Best Effort Data Service Bearer Chunyi Peng Best Effort HotMobile'16 Priority 2 1 (highest) 6-9 17 VoLTE*: Alternative Solution? Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 18 VoLTE*: A Lightweight Voice Solution § Both good of VoIP and VoLTE ¨ ¨ VoIP-centric: low cost on deployment and operation High QoS bearer: call quality PS Domain 4G Gateway VoIP Service High-QoS bearer Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 19 VoLTE*: Voice Service Classes § Apply different QoS profiles to VoIP packets in 4G LTE Service Class Description First Use highest QoS; quality is similar to VoLTE Business Always better than the best-effort QoS profile Deluxe Economy Better than best-effort when needed (e.g., congestion occurs) Economy best-effort Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 20 Modest Support § Device: specify QoS profiles (service classes) for VoIP packets § VoIP service providers: connect to the existing IPX used by carriers to ensure QoS § While congestion occurs, ¨ Upgrade QoS of VoIP packets if subscribing the plan (e.g., “Deluxe Economy” ) Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 21 VoLTE*: Benefit all Parties § Carriers: gain more revenue from priority voice service without deploying and operating IMS core § VoIP service providers: more daily active users – e.g., have more mobile ad. revenue § Users: better service with cheaper fare Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 22 VoLTE* Evaluation in Crowded Areas § Hacking: VoLTE signaling bearer reused to carry VoIP traffic [ccs’15] § VoLTE*: congestion-resistant + lightweight Uplink Downlink [ccs’15] Chiyu Li, et.al Insecurity of Voice Solution VoLTE in LTE Mobile Networks Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 23 Possible Downsides § Technical drawbacks (LTE Radio) ¨ ¨ No VoLTE-like energy-saving mechanism No VoLTE-like coverage enhance mechanism § Non-Technical drawbacks (business concerns) ¨ ¨ Carriers may not want to share customers with VoIP service providers Carriers may not easily deploy new multimedia services Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 24 Summary § VoLTE*: Both good of VoIP and VoLTE ¨ ¨ VoIP: Easy deployment/upgrade and low cost VoLTE: call quality § VoLTE (vs. VoIP) ¨ ¨ Comparable or slightly better quality But, may not worth the efforts § Promises of VoLTE* deployment ¨ ¨ Room for VoLTE (not replacement) Roles of VoIP provider and cellular carriers Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 25 Thank you! Questions? Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 26 Open Issues in VoLTE* § Interplay of VoIP (external) and cellular CS domain ¨ API, translation § Migration from 4G to 2G ¨ Poor support for data (VoIP) in 2G § Voice billing (different QoS) Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 27 Internet PS Domain 4G Gateway IMS Core Data Packet Flow Chunyi Peng Signaling Server Media Gateway VoLTE Signaling Flow HotMobile'16 VoLTE Voice Flow 28 VoLTE*: Four Service Classes § Apply different QoS profiles to VoIP packets in 4G LTE Service Class Description First Use highest QoS; quality is similar to VoLTE Business Always better than the best-effort QoS profile Deluxe Economy Better than best-effort when needed (e.g., congestion occurs) Economy best-effort Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 29 VoLTE*: Only Requires Essential Support from Infrastructure § Allow devices to specify QoS profile for VoIP packets ¨ It is a operational policy issue not a technical problem - QoS negotiation is a mandatory procedure by standards § Allow VoIP service providers to connect to the existing IPX used by carriers in practice ¨ To ensure QoS § While congestion occurs, ¨ 4G infrastructure will upgrade QoS of VoIP packets if users subscribe the service class “Deluxe Economy” Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 30 VoLTE*: Benefit all Parties § Users have better service with cheaper fare Charge (cent/min) Cellular Call Hangouts T-Mobile AT&T Verizon Sprint 450 mins 6.7 8.9 7.8 6.7 900 mins 3.3 4.4 3.9 3.3 450/900 mins 1.2 1.2 0.6 0.9 (Surveyed on Sep. 2015) § Carriers get more revenue from priority service without deploying and operating IMS core § VoIP service providers have more daily active users – e.g., have more mobile ad revenue Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 31 Evaluation of VoLTE* in Crowded Areas ¨ Comparison of Jitter of normal VoIP and VoLTE* (VoIP+ 4G Infrastructure-assisted) Uplink Downlink • VoLTE* is a congestion-resistant voice service, similar to VoLTE; but VoLTE* is lightweight and benefit all parities Chunyi Peng HotMobile'16 32